Investigating the effect of refining parameters on acetic acid removal and the quality of crude epoxidized soybean oil

Tosin Oyewole, Niloy Chandra Sarker, Gurjot Dhaliwal, Emily Biggane, Ewumbua Monono
{"title":"Investigating the effect of refining parameters on acetic acid removal and the quality of crude epoxidized soybean oil","authors":"Tosin Oyewole, Niloy Chandra Sarker, Gurjot Dhaliwal, Emily Biggane, Ewumbua Monono","doi":"10.1002/aocs.12866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Washing crude epoxidized oil is an indispensable step for the removal of residual acetic acid and unreacted hydrogen peroxide after epoxidation. There are many studies on the epoxidation of vegetable oils but there are many discrepancies in the washing process which likely leads to water wastage, excess use of neutralizing agent, and additional processing time. Hence, this study aims to optimize the washing step by analyzing the quality of each washing step and developing a model that can predict the amount of acid removed. Soybean oil (1.5 kg) was epoxidized at 60°C for 5.5 h using Amberlite IR 120H as a heterogeneous catalyst. To determine the optimum water washing level, process parameters such as number of washing cycles (1–5), proportion of epoxidized oil to water volume (1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5), and water temperature (20, 40, and 60°C) were examined. The main responses were the residual acid value and pH of the washed epoxidized oil. Results revealed that 64% of the acid was removed after 5 washing cycles irrespective of the washing water temperature and proportion. In contrast, approximately 57% of the acid was removed in the first two washing cycles. Increasing the temperature of the water affected acid removal; with approximately 54% of acid removed at 20°C compared to 60% at 60°C. Doubling or tripling the amount of water needed above a 1:0.5 ratio did not significantly affect the amount of acid removed. The model developed was significant with a predicted <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> of 96% and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.1 when the model was validated at different washing scenarios. Therefore, this study shows that it is possible to significantly reduce the amount of water used and processing time while maintaining resin qualities.","PeriodicalId":501405,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/aocs.12866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Washing crude epoxidized oil is an indispensable step for the removal of residual acetic acid and unreacted hydrogen peroxide after epoxidation. There are many studies on the epoxidation of vegetable oils but there are many discrepancies in the washing process which likely leads to water wastage, excess use of neutralizing agent, and additional processing time. Hence, this study aims to optimize the washing step by analyzing the quality of each washing step and developing a model that can predict the amount of acid removed. Soybean oil (1.5 kg) was epoxidized at 60°C for 5.5 h using Amberlite IR 120H as a heterogeneous catalyst. To determine the optimum water washing level, process parameters such as number of washing cycles (1–5), proportion of epoxidized oil to water volume (1:0.5, 1:1, 1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5), and water temperature (20, 40, and 60°C) were examined. The main responses were the residual acid value and pH of the washed epoxidized oil. Results revealed that 64% of the acid was removed after 5 washing cycles irrespective of the washing water temperature and proportion. In contrast, approximately 57% of the acid was removed in the first two washing cycles. Increasing the temperature of the water affected acid removal; with approximately 54% of acid removed at 20°C compared to 60% at 60°C. Doubling or tripling the amount of water needed above a 1:0.5 ratio did not significantly affect the amount of acid removed. The model developed was significant with a predicted R2 of 96% and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.1 when the model was validated at different washing scenarios. Therefore, this study shows that it is possible to significantly reduce the amount of water used and processing time while maintaining resin qualities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究精炼参数对醋酸去除和粗环氧大豆油质量的影响
清洗环氧化粗油是去除环氧化后残留醋酸和未反应过氧化氢不可或缺的步骤。关于植物油环氧化的研究很多,但在清洗过程中存在很多差异,这很可能导致水的浪费、中和剂的过量使用以及额外的加工时间。因此,本研究旨在通过分析每个清洗步骤的质量和开发一个可预测酸去除量的模型来优化清洗步骤。使用 Amberlite IR 120H 作为异相催化剂,在 60°C 下对大豆油(1.5 千克)进行 5.5 小时的环氧化处理。为确定最佳水洗水平,研究了水洗循环次数(1-5)、环氧化油与水体积的比例(1:0.5、1:1、1:2、1:3、1:4、1:5)和水温(20、40 和 60°C)等工艺参数。主要反应是洗涤后的环氧化油的残余酸值和 pH 值。结果显示,无论洗涤水的温度和比例如何,经过 5 次洗涤后,64% 的酸被去除。相比之下,大约 57% 的酸在前两个洗涤周期中被去除。提高水温会影响酸的去除率;20°C 时去除约 54% 的酸,而 60°C 时去除 60%。将所需水量增加一倍或两倍,使其超过 1:0.5 的比例,并不会对酸的去除量产生显著影响。所开发的模型在不同的洗涤情况下进行验证时,预测 R2 为 96%,均方根误差为 1.1,效果显著。因此,这项研究表明,在保持树脂质量的前提下大幅减少用水量和加工时间是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medium engineering of lipase‐catalyzed reaction using CO2 Direct application of tungstosilicic acid hydrate for the treatment of high free fatty acid in acidic crude palm oil and for biodiesel production A thorough evaluation of flavor characteristics among various retail peanut oil products using multivariate statistical methods Molecular insights into the oleic acid accumulation in safflower Antioxidant and prooxidant activity of acid‐hydrolyzed phenolic extracts of sugar beet leaves in oil‐in‐water emulsions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1