Comparative study on different coals from the Lorraine basin (France) by sorption isotherms, thermogravimetric analysis and breakthrough curves for CO2-ECBM recovery

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Coal Science & Technology Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1007/s40789-024-00696-8
Franck Amoih, Gisèle Finqueneisel, Thierry Zimny, Sandrine Bourrelly, Odile Barres, Dragan Grgic
{"title":"Comparative study on different coals from the Lorraine basin (France) by sorption isotherms, thermogravimetric analysis and breakthrough curves for CO2-ECBM recovery","authors":"Franck Amoih, Gisèle Finqueneisel, Thierry Zimny, Sandrine Bourrelly, Odile Barres, Dragan Grgic","doi":"10.1007/s40789-024-00696-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The enhanced coalbed methane recovery using CO<sub>2</sub> injection (CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM) is widely proposed as a way of achieving the energy transition and reducing atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in areas such as the Lorrain basin in France, where heavy industry is responsible for huge CO<sub>2</sub> emissions and coal mines have been closed for more than a decade. This paper deals with the feasibility of extracting methane from the Lorraine basin using CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM by comparing data from sorption isotherms, thermogravimetric analyses and breakthrough curves for two coal samples. One is bituminous (Box 18), from Folschviller (France) and is compared with another sub-bituminous (TH01) from La Houve (France), which is used as a reference because it was identified as a good candidate for CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM in a previous research program. The quantities of adsorbed gases (CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub>) obtained by sorption isotherms, thermogravimetry and CO<sub>2</sub> breakthrough curves showed that Box 18 adsorbs more CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> than TH01 due to its higher porosity and good affinity for gases (CO<sub>2</sub>/CH<sub>4</sub>). Tόth model fits the experimental CH<sub>4</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption isotherms better, reflecting the fact that the adsorption surface of the coals studied is heterogeneous. Adsorption enthalpies obtained by calorimetry indicated physisorption for gas-coal interactions, with higher values for CO<sub>2</sub> than for CH<sub>4</sub>. Thermogravimetric analyses and breakthrough curves carried out at up to 50% relative humidity showed that the adsorption capacity of CO<sub>2</sub> decreases with increasing temperature and the presence of water, respectively. The compilation of these experimental data explained the adsorption process of the studied coals and revealed their advantages for CO<sub>2</sub>-ECBM.</p>","PeriodicalId":53469,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Coal Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-024-00696-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The enhanced coalbed methane recovery using CO2 injection (CO2-ECBM) is widely proposed as a way of achieving the energy transition and reducing atmospheric CO2 in areas such as the Lorrain basin in France, where heavy industry is responsible for huge CO2 emissions and coal mines have been closed for more than a decade. This paper deals with the feasibility of extracting methane from the Lorraine basin using CO2-ECBM by comparing data from sorption isotherms, thermogravimetric analyses and breakthrough curves for two coal samples. One is bituminous (Box 18), from Folschviller (France) and is compared with another sub-bituminous (TH01) from La Houve (France), which is used as a reference because it was identified as a good candidate for CO2-ECBM in a previous research program. The quantities of adsorbed gases (CO2/CH4) obtained by sorption isotherms, thermogravimetry and CO2 breakthrough curves showed that Box 18 adsorbs more CO2 and CH4 than TH01 due to its higher porosity and good affinity for gases (CO2/CH4). Tόth model fits the experimental CH4 and CO2 adsorption isotherms better, reflecting the fact that the adsorption surface of the coals studied is heterogeneous. Adsorption enthalpies obtained by calorimetry indicated physisorption for gas-coal interactions, with higher values for CO2 than for CH4. Thermogravimetric analyses and breakthrough curves carried out at up to 50% relative humidity showed that the adsorption capacity of CO2 decreases with increasing temperature and the presence of water, respectively. The compilation of these experimental data explained the adsorption process of the studied coals and revealed their advantages for CO2-ECBM.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过吸附等温线、热重分析和突破曲线对洛林盆地(法国)的不同煤炭进行比较研究,以促进二氧化碳-碳-碳-木质素(CO2-EBM)回收
在法国洛林盆地等重工业排放大量二氧化碳且煤矿已关闭十多年的地区,利用二氧化碳注入强化煤层甲烷回收(CO2-ECBM)被广泛认为是实现能源转型和减少大气中二氧化碳的一种方法。本文通过比较两种煤炭样本的吸附等温线、热重分析和突破曲线数据,探讨了利用 CO2-ECBM 从洛林盆地提取甲烷的可行性。其中一个是来自法国 Folschviller 的烟煤(方框 18),与另一个来自法国 La Houve 的亚烟煤(TH01)进行了比较。通过吸附等温线、热重仪和二氧化碳突破曲线获得的气体(CO2/CH4)吸附量表明,Box 18 比 TH01 吸附更多的 CO2 和 CH4,因为它的孔隙率更高,对气体(CO2/CH4)的亲和力更好。Tόth模型更适合实验中的CH4和CO2吸附等温线,反映了所研究煤炭的吸附表面是异质的这一事实。通过量热法获得的吸附焓表明气体与煤之间存在物理吸附作用,二氧化碳的吸附焓值高于 CH4。在相对湿度高达 50%的条件下进行的热重分析和突破曲线显示,二氧化碳的吸附能力分别随着温度的升高和水的存在而降低。这些实验数据的汇编解释了所研究煤炭的吸附过程,并揭示了它们在 CO2-ECBM 方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
8.40%
发文量
678
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is a peer-reviewed open access journal that focuses on key topics of coal scientific research and mining development. It serves as a forum for scientists to present research findings and discuss challenging issues in the field. The journal covers a range of topics including coal geology, geochemistry, geophysics, mineralogy, and petrology. It also covers coal mining theory, technology, and engineering, as well as coal processing, utilization, and conversion. Additionally, the journal explores coal mining environment and reclamation, along with related aspects. The International Journal of Coal Science & Technology is published with China Coal Society, who also cover the publication costs. This means that authors do not need to pay an article-processing charge.
期刊最新文献
Coal ash resources and potential for rare earth element production in the United States Ecological environment quality assessment of coal mining cities based on GEE platform: A case study of Shuozhou, China Study on signal characteristics of burst tendency coal under different loading rates Image-based quantitative probing of 3D heterogeneous pore structure in CBM reservoir and permeability estimation with pore network modeling Spectral signatures of solvent-extracted macromolecules in Indian coals of different rank: Insights from fluorescence excitation-emission matrix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1