Location optimization of emergency medical services: Considering joint service coverage of ambulances and emergency centers

IF 2.6 3区 经济学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1177/23998083241253108
Weicong Luo, Jing Yao, Richard Mitchell, Xiaoxiang Zhang, Wenqiang Li
{"title":"Location optimization of emergency medical services: Considering joint service coverage of ambulances and emergency centers","authors":"Weicong Luo, Jing Yao, Richard Mitchell, Xiaoxiang Zhang, Wenqiang Li","doi":"10.1177/23998083241253108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergency Medical Services (EMS) play an essential role in saving lives and improving health outcomes by offering immediate medical care to individuals who experience sudden illnesses or injuries. A complete EMS journey consists of two related trips: one from an EMS station to a scene (Trip 1), and the other from a scene to a definitive care location (Trip 2), where the service is coordinately provided by two types of facilities: EMS stations/ambulances and emergency centers (e.g., trauma centers or stroke centers) that are often affiliated with general hospitals. Current work on EMS location optimization considers only one trip (Trip 1 or Trip 2) which ignores the coordination between EMS stations and emergency centers, or the overall trip alone that overlooks the response time requirement. This paper proposed a spatial optimization model, the maximal coverage location problem based on joint coverage (MCLP-JC), for siting EMS stations and emergency centers simultaneously with a consideration of the two related trips. An empirical study of stroke center planning in Wuhan, China, is implemented to compare the proposed approach with the maximal coverage location problem based on overall coverage (MCLP-OC). The results demonstrate that the MCLP-JC can ensure more people being able to receive the first care from an ambulance within the response time requirement, which is critical to subsequent treatment at emergency centers and the odds of survival. The findings from the two scenarios regarding service relocation and expansion offer insights for future health facility planning.","PeriodicalId":11863,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083241253108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) play an essential role in saving lives and improving health outcomes by offering immediate medical care to individuals who experience sudden illnesses or injuries. A complete EMS journey consists of two related trips: one from an EMS station to a scene (Trip 1), and the other from a scene to a definitive care location (Trip 2), where the service is coordinately provided by two types of facilities: EMS stations/ambulances and emergency centers (e.g., trauma centers or stroke centers) that are often affiliated with general hospitals. Current work on EMS location optimization considers only one trip (Trip 1 or Trip 2) which ignores the coordination between EMS stations and emergency centers, or the overall trip alone that overlooks the response time requirement. This paper proposed a spatial optimization model, the maximal coverage location problem based on joint coverage (MCLP-JC), for siting EMS stations and emergency centers simultaneously with a consideration of the two related trips. An empirical study of stroke center planning in Wuhan, China, is implemented to compare the proposed approach with the maximal coverage location problem based on overall coverage (MCLP-OC). The results demonstrate that the MCLP-JC can ensure more people being able to receive the first care from an ambulance within the response time requirement, which is critical to subsequent treatment at emergency centers and the odds of survival. The findings from the two scenarios regarding service relocation and expansion offer insights for future health facility planning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
优化紧急医疗服务的位置:考虑救护车和急救中心的联合服务覆盖范围
紧急医疗服务(EMS)通过为突发疾病或受伤者提供即时医疗服务,在挽救生命和改善健康状况方面发挥着重要作用。一次完整的紧急医疗服务旅程包括两次相关的行程:一次是从紧急医疗服务站到现场(行程 1),另一次是从现场到最终护理地点(行程 2),其中由两类设施协调提供服务:急救站/救护车和急救中心(如创伤中心或中风中心)通常隶属于综合医院。目前有关急救中心位置优化的研究只考虑了一个行程(行程 1 或行程 2),忽略了急救站和急救中心之间的协调,或者只考虑了整个行程,忽略了响应时间要求。本文提出了一个空间优化模型,即基于联合覆盖的最大覆盖选址问题(MCLP-JC),用于同时考虑两个相关行程的急救站和急救中心的选址。通过对中国武汉市脑卒中中心规划的实证研究,将所提出的方法与基于整体覆盖的最大覆盖选址问题(MCLP-OC)进行了比较。结果表明,MCLP-JC 能确保更多的人在响应时间要求内得到救护车的第一时间救治,这对急救中心的后续治疗和生存几率至关重要。有关服务迁移和扩展的两种方案的研究结果为未来的医疗设施规划提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
159
期刊最新文献
Investigating urban morphological drivers of household water use in developing economies: A structural equation model approach Towards a more realistic estimation of urban land take by combining cadastral parcels and building footprints A sidewalk-level urban heat risk assessment framework using pedestrian mobility and urban microclimate modeling Mapping sense of place as a measurable urban identity: Using street view images and machine learning to identify building façade materials Visualizing the global deployment of Filipina workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1