Machine Learning for Prediction of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Inflammatory and Nutritional Indicators in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.2147/cmar.s454638
Qiaoli Wang, Tao Liang, Yuexi Li, Xiaoqin Liu
{"title":"Machine Learning for Prediction of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Inflammatory and Nutritional Indicators in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Qiaoli Wang, Tao Liang, Yuexi Li, Xiaoqin Liu","doi":"10.2147/cmar.s454638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of blood inflammation in the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and propose a machine-learning-based method to predict NSCLC in asymptomatic adults.<br/><strong>Patients and Methods:</strong> A cross-sectional study was evaluated using medical records of 139 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and physical examination data from May 2022 to May 2023 of 198 healthy controls. The NSCLC cohort comprised 128 cases of adenocarcinoma, 3 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, and 8 cases of other NSCLC subtypes. The correlation between inflammatory and nutritional markers, such as monocytes, neutrophils, LMR, NLR, PLR, PHR and non-small cell lung cancer was examined. Features were selected using Python’s feature selection library and analyzed by five algorithms. The predictive ability of the model for non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis was assessed by precision, accuracy, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC).<br/><strong>Results:</strong> The results showed that the top 14 important factors were PDW, age, TP, RBC, HGB, LYM, LYM%, RDW, PLR, LMR, PHR, MONO, MONO%, gender. Additionally, the naive Bayes (NB) algorithm demonstrated the highest overall performance in predicting adult NSCLC among the five machine learning algorithms, achieving an accuracy of 0.87, a macro average F1 score of 0.85, a weighted average F1 score of 0.87, and an AUC of 0.84.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> In feature ranking, platelet distribution width was the most important feature, and the NB algorithm performed best in predicting adult NSCLC diagnosis.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> machine learning, non-small cell lung cancer, inflammatory indicators, nutritional indicators, ratio, diagnosis<br/>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/cmar.s454638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of blood inflammation in the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and propose a machine-learning-based method to predict NSCLC in asymptomatic adults.
Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was evaluated using medical records of 139 patients with non-small cell lung cancer and physical examination data from May 2022 to May 2023 of 198 healthy controls. The NSCLC cohort comprised 128 cases of adenocarcinoma, 3 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, and 8 cases of other NSCLC subtypes. The correlation between inflammatory and nutritional markers, such as monocytes, neutrophils, LMR, NLR, PLR, PHR and non-small cell lung cancer was examined. Features were selected using Python’s feature selection library and analyzed by five algorithms. The predictive ability of the model for non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis was assessed by precision, accuracy, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve (AUC).
Results: The results showed that the top 14 important factors were PDW, age, TP, RBC, HGB, LYM, LYM%, RDW, PLR, LMR, PHR, MONO, MONO%, gender. Additionally, the naive Bayes (NB) algorithm demonstrated the highest overall performance in predicting adult NSCLC among the five machine learning algorithms, achieving an accuracy of 0.87, a macro average F1 score of 0.85, a weighted average F1 score of 0.87, and an AUC of 0.84.
Conclusion: In feature ranking, platelet distribution width was the most important feature, and the NB algorithm performed best in predicting adult NSCLC diagnosis.

Keywords: machine learning, non-small cell lung cancer, inflammatory indicators, nutritional indicators, ratio, diagnosis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于炎症和营养指标的成人非小细胞肺癌预测机器学习:一项横断面研究
目的:本研究旨在评估血液炎症对诊断非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的潜在益处,并提出一种基于机器学习的方法来预测无症状成年人的NSCLC:利用139名非小细胞肺癌患者的医疗记录和198名健康对照者2022年5月至2023年5月的体检数据,对一项横断面研究进行了评估。非小细胞肺癌队列包括128例腺癌、3例鳞状细胞癌和8例其他非小细胞肺癌亚型。研究人员检测了单核细胞、中性粒细胞、LMR、NLR、PLR、PHR 等炎症和营养标记物与非小细胞肺癌之间的相关性。使用 Python 的特征选择库选择特征,并通过五种算法进行分析。模型对非小细胞肺癌诊断的预测能力通过精确度、准确度、召回率、F1得分和曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估:结果显示,排在前14位的重要因素分别是PDW、年龄、TP、RBC、HGB、LYM、LYM%、RDW、PLR、LMR、PHR、MONO、MONO%、性别。此外,在五种机器学习算法中,天真贝叶斯(NB)算法在预测成人 NSCLC 方面的总体性能最高,准确率达到 0.87,宏观平均 F1 得分为 0.85,加权平均 F1 得分为 0.87,AUC 为 0.84:关键词:机器学习;非小细胞肺癌;炎症指标;营养指标;比值;诊断
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1