Network structure indicators predict ecological robustness in food webs

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecological Research Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1111/1440-1703.12489
Yi Tang, Fengzhen Wang, Wenhao Zhou
{"title":"Network structure indicators predict ecological robustness in food webs","authors":"Yi Tang,&nbsp;Fengzhen Wang,&nbsp;Wenhao Zhou","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.12489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Food web robustness is a critical aspect of ecosystem stability and has been extensively studied in ecology. However, the potential of machine learning techniques in predicting food web robustness and the identification of key network structure indicators have not been fully explored. We compared the suitability of different machine learning methods and assessed the relative importance of network structure indicators for predicting the robustness of food webs. We utilized a variety of food web datasets spanning different ecosystems to calculate network structure indicators, which include average distance (AD), betweenness centrality (BC), directional connectivity (C), closeness centrality (CC), diameter (D), degree centrality (DC), edge betweenness centrality (EBC), number of links (L), linkage density (LD), and number of nodes (N). We then compared the performance of machine learning methods, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and decision tree (DT), and evaluated the relative importance of network structure indicators on robustness predictions. The results demonstrate that the RF model has the best performance (MAE = 0.0178, RMSE = 0.0263, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.9063). Meanwhile, the CC indicator has a significant impact in predicting robustness of food webs. It is suggested that both the RF model and the CC indicator should be considered seriously in predicting food web robustness. This research elucidates the differential outcomes when various machine learning methodologies and indicators are employed to predict the robustness of food webs. It significantly enhances our understanding by demonstrating the precise capability of machine learning models in forecasting the robustness of food webs.</p>","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"39 5","pages":"766-774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1440-1703.12489","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food web robustness is a critical aspect of ecosystem stability and has been extensively studied in ecology. However, the potential of machine learning techniques in predicting food web robustness and the identification of key network structure indicators have not been fully explored. We compared the suitability of different machine learning methods and assessed the relative importance of network structure indicators for predicting the robustness of food webs. We utilized a variety of food web datasets spanning different ecosystems to calculate network structure indicators, which include average distance (AD), betweenness centrality (BC), directional connectivity (C), closeness centrality (CC), diameter (D), degree centrality (DC), edge betweenness centrality (EBC), number of links (L), linkage density (LD), and number of nodes (N). We then compared the performance of machine learning methods, including artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), and decision tree (DT), and evaluated the relative importance of network structure indicators on robustness predictions. The results demonstrate that the RF model has the best performance (MAE = 0.0178, RMSE = 0.0263, R2 = 0.9063). Meanwhile, the CC indicator has a significant impact in predicting robustness of food webs. It is suggested that both the RF model and the CC indicator should be considered seriously in predicting food web robustness. This research elucidates the differential outcomes when various machine learning methodologies and indicators are employed to predict the robustness of food webs. It significantly enhances our understanding by demonstrating the precise capability of machine learning models in forecasting the robustness of food webs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络结构指标可预测食物网的生态稳健性
食物网的稳健性是生态系统稳定性的一个重要方面,生态学对此进行了广泛的研究。然而,机器学习技术在预测食物网稳健性和识别关键网络结构指标方面的潜力尚未得到充分探索。我们比较了不同机器学习方法的适用性,并评估了网络结构指标在预测食物网稳健性方面的相对重要性。我们利用跨越不同生态系统的各种食物网数据集来计算网络结构指标,其中包括平均距离(AD)、介度中心性(BC)、方向连通性(C)、亲近中心性(CC)、直径(D)、度中心性(DC)、边缘介度中心性(EBC)、链接数(L)、链接密度(LD)和节点数(N)。然后,我们比较了人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)、最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)以及决策树(DT)等机器学习方法的性能,并评估了网络结构指标对鲁棒性预测的相对重要性。结果表明,RF 模型性能最佳(MAE = 0.0178,RMSE = 0.0263,R2 = 0.9063)。同时,CC 指标对预测食物网的稳健性有显著影响。建议在预测食物网稳健性时,应认真考虑 RF 模型和 CC 指标。这项研究阐明了采用各种机器学习方法和指标预测食物网稳健性时的不同结果。它通过展示机器学习模型在预测食物网稳健性方面的精确能力,极大地加深了我们的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Spatiotemporal interactions between jaguars (Panthera onca) and their potential prey in Amazonian islands Seed dispersal of Zoysia japonica by sika deer: An example of the “foliage is the fruit” hypothesis From anthropogenic toward natural acidification: Effects of future deposition and climate on recovery in a humic catchment in Norway Phenotyping of the nickel metal crop Bornmuellera emarginata for establishing breeding selection criteria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1