Protecting oil storage tanks against floods: Natech risk assessment with imprecise probabilities

IF 1.6 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-27 DOI:10.1002/cjce.25349
Alireza Dehghanisanij, Nima Khakzad, Ernesto Salzano, Paul Amyotte
{"title":"Protecting oil storage tanks against floods: Natech risk assessment with imprecise probabilities","authors":"Alireza Dehghanisanij,&nbsp;Nima Khakzad,&nbsp;Ernesto Salzano,&nbsp;Paul Amyotte","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Natechs are technological accidents that are triggered by natural disasters. The increase in the frequency and severity of climatic natural disasters along with the growth of industrialization has accelerated the demand for development of dedicated methodologies for risk assessment and management of Natechs. Due to a lack of accurate and sufficient data, risk assessment of Natechs has largely been based on subjective assumptions and imprecise probabilities, making the assessed risks and the subsequent risk management strategies deficient in terms of cost-effectiveness. In the present study, evidence theory, as an effective technique for dealing with imprecise probabilities, and Bayesian network, as an effective tool for reasoning under uncertainty, are combined to develop a methodology for risk analysis of Natechs based on imprecise probabilities with no attempt to increase the precision of the input data but the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the outcomes. Flotation of oil tanks during floods has been considered to exemplify the methodology. The methodology is demonstrated to outperform conventional approaches where average probabilities or generic probability distributions are used instead of interval probabilities for risk assessment and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"102 10","pages":"3333-3344"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cjce.25349","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Natechs are technological accidents that are triggered by natural disasters. The increase in the frequency and severity of climatic natural disasters along with the growth of industrialization has accelerated the demand for development of dedicated methodologies for risk assessment and management of Natechs. Due to a lack of accurate and sufficient data, risk assessment of Natechs has largely been based on subjective assumptions and imprecise probabilities, making the assessed risks and the subsequent risk management strategies deficient in terms of cost-effectiveness. In the present study, evidence theory, as an effective technique for dealing with imprecise probabilities, and Bayesian network, as an effective tool for reasoning under uncertainty, are combined to develop a methodology for risk analysis of Natechs based on imprecise probabilities with no attempt to increase the precision of the input data but the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the outcomes. Flotation of oil tanks during floods has been considered to exemplify the methodology. The methodology is demonstrated to outperform conventional approaches where average probabilities or generic probability distributions are used instead of interval probabilities for risk assessment and management.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护储油罐免受洪水侵袭:不精确概率下的 Natech 风险评估
Natechs 是由自然灾害引发的技术事故。随着工业化的发展,气候自然灾害的频率和严重程度都在增加,这加速了对开发专门的 Natechs 风险评估和管理方法的需求。由于缺乏准确和充分的数据,对 Natechs 的风险评估主要基于主观假设和不精确的概率,使得评估的风险和随后的风险管理战略在成本效益方面存在缺陷。在本研究中,证据理论作为处理不精确概率的有效技术,贝叶斯网络作为在不确定性条件下进行推理的有效工具,两者相结合,开发出一种基于不精确概率的 Natechs 风险分析方法,该方法并不试图提高输入数据的精确度,而是试图提高结果的准确性和成本效益。洪水期间油罐的浮选被视为该方法的范例。在风险评估和管理中,该方法优于使用平均概率或通用概率分布而不是区间概率的传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
448
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Highlights Issue Information Issue Highlights Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1