A comprehensive approach to assess the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites: the Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1007/s10518-024-01942-9
Laura Gambilongo, Nicola Chieffo, Paulo B. Lourenço
{"title":"A comprehensive approach to assess the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites: the Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona","authors":"Laura Gambilongo,&nbsp;Nicola Chieffo,&nbsp;Paulo B. Lourenço","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01942-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The proposed research work presents a comprehensive approach to assessing the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites. This approach aims to be a quick and easy-to-use investigation procedure that enables accurate and large-scale evaluations. While the methods employed are well-established in the literature and have been widely applied to buildings, this study contributes by proposing a structured framework that integrates different assessment procedures at different levels of analysis, specifically tailored to archaeological sites. The analysis is divided into three stages within the conceptual framework: (i) the application of the Masonry Quality Index; (ii) seismic vulnerability assessment and prediction of expected damage; and (iii) analysis of individual walls’ structural response through strength domain, capacity and fragility curves. Specifically, the study explores and adapts four Vulnerability Index methods, i.e. GNDT, Formisano, Vicente and Ferreira methods, to suit the specific characteristics of archaeological sites. To this end, a simplified procedure is proposed to estimate the conventional strength in the methods’ forms. The comparison of the index-based methods is then crucial for critically evaluating the reliability of vulnerability estimations. The paper illustrates the application of this framework through a detailed case study, i.e. the archaeological site of Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona (US), demonstrating its effectiveness in evaluating the seismic risk and defining the vulnerability distribution of the site. Consequently, this approach facilitates the identification of the most sensitive areas, which necessitate further investigation, providing useful outcomes for the decision-making process concerning the conservation and protection of archaeological sites.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 9","pages":"4413 - 4445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-024-01942-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01942-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The proposed research work presents a comprehensive approach to assessing the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites. This approach aims to be a quick and easy-to-use investigation procedure that enables accurate and large-scale evaluations. While the methods employed are well-established in the literature and have been widely applied to buildings, this study contributes by proposing a structured framework that integrates different assessment procedures at different levels of analysis, specifically tailored to archaeological sites. The analysis is divided into three stages within the conceptual framework: (i) the application of the Masonry Quality Index; (ii) seismic vulnerability assessment and prediction of expected damage; and (iii) analysis of individual walls’ structural response through strength domain, capacity and fragility curves. Specifically, the study explores and adapts four Vulnerability Index methods, i.e. GNDT, Formisano, Vicente and Ferreira methods, to suit the specific characteristics of archaeological sites. To this end, a simplified procedure is proposed to estimate the conventional strength in the methods’ forms. The comparison of the index-based methods is then crucial for critically evaluating the reliability of vulnerability estimations. The paper illustrates the application of this framework through a detailed case study, i.e. the archaeological site of Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona (US), demonstrating its effectiveness in evaluating the seismic risk and defining the vulnerability distribution of the site. Consequently, this approach facilitates the identification of the most sensitive areas, which necessitate further investigation, providing useful outcomes for the decision-making process concerning the conservation and protection of archaeological sites.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估考古遗址地震脆弱性的综合方法:亚利桑那州的 Wupatki Pueblo
拟议的研究工作提出了一种评估考古遗址地震脆弱性的综合方法。该方法旨在成为一种快速、易用的调查程序,能够进行准确、大规模的评估。虽然所采用的方法在文献中已得到证实,并已广泛应用于建筑物,但本研究提出了一个结构化框架,在不同的分析层面整合了不同的评估程序,专门针对考古遗址。概念框架内的分析分为三个阶段:(i) 砌体质量指数的应用;(ii) 地震脆弱性评估和预期破坏预测;(iii) 通过强度域、承载力和脆性曲线分析单个墙体的结构响应。具体而言,该研究探索并调整了四种脆弱性指数方法,即 GNDT、Formisano、Vicente 和 Ferreira 方法,以适应考古遗址的具体特点。为此,提出了一个简化程序来估算这些方法的常规强度。然后,对基于指数的方法进行比较对于严格评估脆弱性估算的可靠性至关重要。本文通过一个详细的案例研究(即美国亚利桑那州的 Wupatki Pueblo 考古遗址)说明了这一框架的应用,展示了其在评估地震风险和确定遗址脆弱性分布方面的有效性。因此,这种方法有助于确定需要进一步调查的最敏感地区,为保存和保护考古遗址的决策过程提供有用的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
19.60%
发文量
263
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings. Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more. This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.
期刊最新文献
Towards seismic risk reduction of critical facilities combining earthquake early warning and structural monitoring: a demonstration study Seismic evaluation and comparison of ground motion characteristics in Kahramanmaras and Hatay provinces following the 2023 Pazarcik-Elbistan Earthquake sequences Using image-based inspection data to improve response predictions of earthquake-damaged unreinforced masonry buildings Experimental cyclic testing of masonry pier-spandrel substructures reinforced with engineered cementitious composites overlay Influence of opening shape, size and position on the ultimate strength, stiffness and energy dissipation of confined brick masonry walls
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1