Public wages, public employment, and business cycle volatility: Evidence from U.S. metro areas

IF 2.3 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Review of Economic Dynamics Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1016/j.red.2024.05.001
Claire A. Boeing-Reicher, Vincenzo Caponi
{"title":"Public wages, public employment, and business cycle volatility: Evidence from U.S. metro areas","authors":"Claire A. Boeing-Reicher,&nbsp;Vincenzo Caponi","doi":"10.1016/j.red.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We revisit the question about whether a larger public sector stabilizes or destabilizes the economy. Based on results from two causal identification approaches, we show that a higher rate of public-sector employment reduces volatility in, i.e. stabilizes, private-sector employment growth, with at most a slight crowding-out of private employment. Public wages, meanwhile, increase private wages but appear not to be destabilizing. The stabilizing effect of public employment with limited crowding out is at odds with standard search and matching models that contain a public sector, which predict 1:1 crowding out and strong destabilization. To improve the performance of such models, we follow <span>Gomes (2015)</span> and add a product market that can replicate what Gomes calls the Business Cycle Wealth Effect. We also point out that the government procures output directly from the private sector. When the model has these two features, then it can generate stabilizing effects of public employment on private employment, with reduced crowding out.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47890,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economic Dynamics","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094202524000152/pdfft?md5=663061ba25eaa8eb1e35fc5b7b7b7c17&pid=1-s2.0-S1094202524000152-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economic Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094202524000152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We revisit the question about whether a larger public sector stabilizes or destabilizes the economy. Based on results from two causal identification approaches, we show that a higher rate of public-sector employment reduces volatility in, i.e. stabilizes, private-sector employment growth, with at most a slight crowding-out of private employment. Public wages, meanwhile, increase private wages but appear not to be destabilizing. The stabilizing effect of public employment with limited crowding out is at odds with standard search and matching models that contain a public sector, which predict 1:1 crowding out and strong destabilization. To improve the performance of such models, we follow Gomes (2015) and add a product market that can replicate what Gomes calls the Business Cycle Wealth Effect. We also point out that the government procures output directly from the private sector. When the model has these two features, then it can generate stabilizing effects of public employment on private employment, with reduced crowding out.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共工资、公共就业和商业周期波动:来自美国大都市地区的证据
我们重新探讨了公共部门规模扩大是会稳定经济还是会破坏经济稳定的问题。根据两种因果识别方法得出的结果,我们发现公共部门就业率的提高会降低私营部门就业增长的波动性,即稳定私营部门的就业增长,最多会对私营部门的就业产生轻微的挤出效应。与此同时,公共工资会增加私人工资,但似乎不会破坏稳定。公共部门就业的稳定效应和有限的挤出效应与包含公共部门的标准搜索和匹配模型不符,后者预测 1:1 的挤出效应和强烈的不稳定。为了改善这类模型的性能,我们遵循并增加了一个产品市场,它可以复制戈麦斯所说的商业周期财富效应。我们还指出,政府直接从私营部门采购产出。当模型具备这两个特征时,就能产生公共就业对私人就业的稳定效应,同时减少挤出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Review of Economic Dynamics publishes meritorious original contributions to dynamic economics. The scope of the journal is intended to be broad and to reflect the view of the Society for Economic Dynamics that the field of economics is unified by the scientific approach to economics. We will publish contributions in any area of economics provided they meet the highest standards of scientific research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Unconventional monetary and fiscal policy Means-tested programs and interstate migration in the United States Home construction financing and search frictions in the housing market A job ladder model of executive compensation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1