Finite undecidability in PAC and PRC fields

IF 0.6 2区 数学 Q2 LOGIC Annals of Pure and Applied Logic Pub Date : 2024-05-20 DOI:10.1016/j.apal.2024.103465
Brian Tyrrell
{"title":"Finite undecidability in PAC and PRC fields","authors":"Brian Tyrrell","doi":"10.1016/j.apal.2024.103465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A field <em>K</em> in a ring language <span><math><mi>L</mi></math></span> is <em>finitely undecidable</em> if <span><math><mtext>Cons</mtext><mo>(</mo><mi>Σ</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span> is undecidable for every nonempty finite <span><math><mi>Σ</mi><mo>⊆</mo><mtext>Th</mtext><mo>(</mo><mi>K</mi><mo>;</mo><mi>L</mi><mo>)</mo></math></span>. We adapt arguments originating with Cherlin-van den Dries-Macintyre/Ershov (for PAC fields) and Haran (for PRC fields) to prove all PAC and PRC fields are finitely undecidable. We describe the difficulties that arise in adapting the proof to P<em>p</em>C fields, and show no bounded P<em>p</em>C field is finitely axiomatisable. This work is drawn from the author's PhD thesis <span>[44, Chapter 4]</span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50762,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007224000630/pdfft?md5=4a33b42fff6d541d26261561103e7ddd&pid=1-s2.0-S0168007224000630-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pure and Applied Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168007224000630","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field K in a ring language L is finitely undecidable if Cons(Σ) is undecidable for every nonempty finite ΣTh(K;L). We adapt arguments originating with Cherlin-van den Dries-Macintyre/Ershov (for PAC fields) and Haran (for PRC fields) to prove all PAC and PRC fields are finitely undecidable. We describe the difficulties that arise in adapting the proof to PpC fields, and show no bounded PpC field is finitely axiomatisable. This work is drawn from the author's PhD thesis [44, Chapter 4].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PAC 和 PRC 领域中的有限不可判定性
如果对于每个非空有限 Σ⊆Th(K;L),环语言 L 中的场 K 是有限不可判定的,那么 Cons(Σ) 就是不可判定的。我们改编了起源于谢林-范登德里斯-麦金泰尔/埃尔绍夫(针对 PAC 场)和哈兰(针对 PRC 场)的论证,证明所有 PAC 场和 PRC 场都是有限不可判定的。我们描述了将这一证明应用于 PpC 场时遇到的困难,并证明了没有一个有界 PpC 场是有限公理可证的。这项工作来自作者的博士论文[44,第 4 章]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
78
审稿时长
200 days
期刊介绍: The journal Annals of Pure and Applied Logic publishes high quality papers in all areas of mathematical logic as well as applications of logic in mathematics, in theoretical computer science and in other related disciplines. All submissions to the journal should be mathematically correct, well written (preferably in English)and contain relevant new results that are of significant interest to a substantial number of logicians. The journal also considers submissions that are somewhat too long to be published by other journals while being too short to form a separate memoir provided that they are of particular outstanding quality and broad interest. In addition, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic occasionally publishes special issues of selected papers from well-chosen conferences in pure and applied logic.
期刊最新文献
Dividing and forking in random hypergraphs Editorial Board Saturation properties for compositional truth with propositional correctness Foundations of iterated star maps and their use in combinatorics Theories of Frege structure equivalent to Feferman's system T0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1