Return to work in persons with persistent postconcussion symptoms: a survey study examining the perspectives of employees and managers.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2024-09-18 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2361620
Irene Conradsen, Victoria Eva Bang-Hansen, Alexander N Sørensen, Hana Malá Rytter
{"title":"Return to work in persons with persistent postconcussion symptoms: a survey study examining the perspectives of employees and managers.","authors":"Irene Conradsen, Victoria Eva Bang-Hansen, Alexander N Sørensen, Hana Malá Rytter","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2361620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine challenges in return to work (RTW) for persons with persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) experienced by the affected employees and their managers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey of employees (S-E) and two surveys of managers (S-M1, S-M2) executed 4 months apart to capture the time perspective. Inclusion: Adults aged 18-66 with PPCS > 4 weeks, employed at the time of mTBI who returned to work within the previous year. Managers involved in their RTW process.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Work status, working hours, work functioning (Work Role Functioning Questionnaire, WRFQ), work productivity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two employees and 66 managers were recruited. Three-fourths of the employees had returned to work but only one-third worked under similar conditions. Weekly working hours decreased from 36,3 hours (SD = 10,5) before mTBI to 17,6 hours (SD = 9,7). Employees had difficulties with tasks 43% of time (WRFQ). They needed more breaks, struggled with multitasking and work speed. About 65.9% experienced affected work productivity. Managers reported lack of knowledge and difficulties assessing the number of working hours and suitable tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most employees returned to work but only a minority worked under similar conditions as before mTBI. Employees and managers struggled to estimate workload. The affected employees and their workplaces need a long-term RTW support.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"908-917"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2361620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine challenges in return to work (RTW) for persons with persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) experienced by the affected employees and their managers.

Methods: A survey of employees (S-E) and two surveys of managers (S-M1, S-M2) executed 4 months apart to capture the time perspective. Inclusion: Adults aged 18-66 with PPCS > 4 weeks, employed at the time of mTBI who returned to work within the previous year. Managers involved in their RTW process.

Outcome measures: Work status, working hours, work functioning (Work Role Functioning Questionnaire, WRFQ), work productivity.

Results: Ninety-two employees and 66 managers were recruited. Three-fourths of the employees had returned to work but only one-third worked under similar conditions. Weekly working hours decreased from 36,3 hours (SD = 10,5) before mTBI to 17,6 hours (SD = 9,7). Employees had difficulties with tasks 43% of time (WRFQ). They needed more breaks, struggled with multitasking and work speed. About 65.9% experienced affected work productivity. Managers reported lack of knowledge and difficulties assessing the number of working hours and suitable tasks.

Conclusions: Most employees returned to work but only a minority worked under similar conditions as before mTBI. Employees and managers struggled to estimate workload. The affected employees and their workplaces need a long-term RTW support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脑震荡后症状持续存在者重返工作岗位:一项调查研究,探讨员工和管理人员的观点。
目的研究受影响员工及其管理者在为持续性脑震荡后症状(PPCS)患者重返工作岗位(RTW)过程中遇到的挑战:方法:对员工(S-E)和管理人员(S-M1、S-M2)进行两次调查,时间间隔为 4 个月,以捕捉时间视角。调查对象:年龄在 18-66 岁、PPCS > 4 周、在发生创伤后应激障碍时受雇并在过去一年内重返工作岗位的成年人。结果测量:结果测量:工作状态、工作时间、工作功能(工作角色功能问卷,WRFQ)、工作效率:结果:共招募了 92 名员工和 66 名管理人员。四分之三的员工重返工作岗位,但只有三分之一的员工在类似条件下工作。每周工作时间从创伤后应激障碍前的 36.3 小时(标准差 = 10.5)减少到 17.6 小时(标准差 = 9.7)。43%的员工在执行任务时遇到困难(WRFQ)。他们需要更多的休息时间,在多任务处理和工作速度方面感到吃力。约 65.9% 的员工工作效率受到影响。管理人员表示缺乏相关知识,难以评估工作时数和合适的任务:大多数员工重返工作岗位,但只有少数人的工作条件与创伤后应激障碍发生前相似。员工和管理人员都难以估计工作量。受影响的员工及其工作场所需要长期的复工支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Functional network disruptions in youth with concussion using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Treatment of intractable paradoxical herniation by invasive mechanical ventilation with increased positive end-expiratory pressure: a case report. Assessment of arousal recovery after cardiac arrest using diffusion kurtosis MRI with higher b-values: a pilot study. Redefining adjustment after acquired brain injury. Antiseizure medication possibly potentiates ictal bradycardia: a word of caution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1