Clinical predictors of therapeutic failure of occipital nerve stimulation in refractory chronic cluster headache.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI:10.1177/03331024241254078
Javier A Membrilla, María-Luz Cuadrado, Nuria González-García, Jesús Porta-Etessam, Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero, Alberto Lozano Ros, Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez, Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga, Sonia Quintas, Jaime S Rodríguez Vico, Alex Jaimes, Lucía Llorente Ayuso, Javier Roa, Carlos Estebas, Javier Díaz-de-Terán
{"title":"Clinical predictors of therapeutic failure of occipital nerve stimulation in refractory chronic cluster headache.","authors":"Javier A Membrilla, María-Luz Cuadrado, Nuria González-García, Jesús Porta-Etessam, Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero, Alberto Lozano Ros, Alicia Gonzalez-Martinez, Ana Beatriz Gago-Veiga, Sonia Quintas, Jaime S Rodríguez Vico, Alex Jaimes, Lucía Llorente Ayuso, Javier Roa, Carlos Estebas, Javier Díaz-de-Terán","doi":"10.1177/03331024241254078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is a treatment with evidence in refractory chronic cluster headache (CCH). However, the variable response rate and cost make it necessary to investigate predictors of response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study conducted through the review of medical records of CCH patients from six hospitals in Madrid. Epidemiological and clinical variables were compared between patients with ONS failure and the rest. ONS failure was defined as the need for device withdrawal or switch off because of lack of response or adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a series of 88 CCH, 26 (29.6%) underwent ONS surgery, of whom 13/26 (50.0%) failed because lack of response. ONS failure group had an earlier headache onset (mean ± SD) of 27.7 ± 6.9 vs. 36.7 ± 11.8 years, <i>p</i> = 0.026) and a higher smoking rate (100% vs. 42.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.006). Stational fluctuations (58.3% vs. 7.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.007) and nocturnal exacerbations (91.7% vs. 53.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.035) were more frequent in the ONS failure group as well. There was no difference between groups in diagnostic delay, years of evolution prior to surgery, mental illness, comorbidity with other headache disorders or chronic pain conditions or prior response to occipital nerves anesthetic blocks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some clinical features such as an early debut, smoking and seasonal or circadian fluctuations could be related to failure of ONS in refractory CCH.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"44 5","pages":"3331024241254078"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024241254078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) is a treatment with evidence in refractory chronic cluster headache (CCH). However, the variable response rate and cost make it necessary to investigate predictors of response.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted through the review of medical records of CCH patients from six hospitals in Madrid. Epidemiological and clinical variables were compared between patients with ONS failure and the rest. ONS failure was defined as the need for device withdrawal or switch off because of lack of response or adverse events.

Results: From a series of 88 CCH, 26 (29.6%) underwent ONS surgery, of whom 13/26 (50.0%) failed because lack of response. ONS failure group had an earlier headache onset (mean ± SD) of 27.7 ± 6.9 vs. 36.7 ± 11.8 years, p = 0.026) and a higher smoking rate (100% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.006). Stational fluctuations (58.3% vs. 7.7%, p = 0.007) and nocturnal exacerbations (91.7% vs. 53.9%, p = 0.035) were more frequent in the ONS failure group as well. There was no difference between groups in diagnostic delay, years of evolution prior to surgery, mental illness, comorbidity with other headache disorders or chronic pain conditions or prior response to occipital nerves anesthetic blocks.

Conclusions: Some clinical features such as an early debut, smoking and seasonal or circadian fluctuations could be related to failure of ONS in refractory CCH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
难治性慢性丛集性头痛患者枕神经刺激治疗失败的临床预测因素。
背景:枕神经刺激(ONS)是一种治疗难治性慢性丛集性头痛(CCH)的有效方法。然而,由于反应率和费用不一,有必要对反应的预测因素进行调查:这是一项横断面研究,通过审查马德里六家医院的慢性丛集性头痛患者的病历进行。对 ONS 失败患者和其他患者的流行病学和临床变量进行了比较。ONS失败的定义是由于缺乏反应或不良事件而需要撤除或关闭设备:在88例慢性头痛患者中,26例(29.6%)接受了ONS手术,其中13/26(50.0%)因无反应而失败。ONS手术失败组的头痛发病时间较早(平均±标准差)为27.7±6.9岁对36.7±11.8岁,P = 0.026),吸烟率较高(100%对42.9%,P = 0.006)。ONS 失败组的病情波动(58.3% 对 7.7%,p = 0.007)和夜间病情加重(91.7% 对 53.9%,p = 0.035)也更频繁。两组患者在诊断延迟、术前病程年限、精神疾病、合并其他头痛疾病或慢性疼痛病症或之前对枕神经麻醉阻滞的反应等方面没有差异:结论:一些临床特征,如初诊时间早、吸烟、季节或昼夜节律波动,可能与难治性 CCH 的 ONS 治疗失败有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
期刊最新文献
The incremental burden and healthcare resource utilization among people with migraine in Europe: Insights from the 2020 European National Health and Wellness Survey. Weight loss with atogepant during the preventive treatment of migraine: A pooled analysis. Effect of preventive treatment with atogepant on quality of life, daily functioning, and headache impact across the spectrum of migraine: Findings from three double-blind, randomized, phase 3 trials. An evolving machine-learning-based algorithm to early predict response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine. Communicate your findings with graphical abstract in Cephalalgia : Why and how?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1