Exploring the Influence of Initial Estimates on Iterative Maximum Likelihood Expectation-maximization in Tomographic Reconstruction.

IF 0.7 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-30 DOI:10.4103/jmp.jmp_110_23
Mohsen Qutbi
{"title":"Exploring the Influence of Initial Estimates on Iterative Maximum Likelihood Expectation-maximization in Tomographic Reconstruction.","authors":"Mohsen Qutbi","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_110_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the influence of initial guess or estimate (uniform as \"ones\" and \"zeros\" vs. filtered back projection [FBP] image) as an input image for maximum likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) tomographic reconstruction algorithm and provide the curves of error or convergence for each of these three initial estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two phantoms, created as digital images, were utilized: one was a simple noiseless object and the other was a more complicated, noise-degraded object of the section of lower thorax in a matrix of 256 × 256 pixels. Both underwent radon transform or forward projection process and the corresponding sinograms were generated. For filtering during tomographic image reconstruction, ramp and Butterworth filters, as high-pass and low-pass ones, were applied to images. The second phantom (lower thorax) was radon-transformed and the resulting sinogram was degraded by noise. As initial guess or estimate images, in addition to FBP tomographic image, two uniform images, one with all pixels having a value of 1 (\"ones\") and the other with all having zero (\"zeros\"), were created. The three initial estimates (FBP, ones, and zeros) were reconstructed with iterative MLEM tomographic reconstruction (with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 iterations). The difference between the object and the updated slice was calculated at the end of each iteration (as error matrix), and the mean squared error (MSE) was computed and plotted separately or in conjunction with the MSE curves of other initial estimates. All computations were implemented in MATLAB software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of ones and zeros seemed strikingly similar. The curves of uniform ones and uniform zeros were so close to each other that overlap near-perfectly. However, in the FBP slice as an initial estimate, the resulting tomographic slice was similar with a much higher extent to the object even after 1 or 2 iterations. The pattern of convergence for all three curves was roughly similar. The normalized MSE decreased sharply up to 5 iterations and then, after 10 iterations, the curves reached a plateau until 32 iterations. For the phantom of the lower thorax section with its noise-degraded sinogram, similar to the pattern observed for simple disk-shaped phantom, the curves (normalized MSE) fell sharply up to 10 iterations and then rapidly converged thereafter until 64 iterations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Similar results are observed when choosing different initial guesses or estimates (uniform vs. FBP) as the starting point, based on the error calculation using MSE. The algorithm converges almost similarly for all initial estimates. Therefore, selecting a uniform initial guess image can be an appropriate choice and may be preferred over an FBP image. Reducing the processing time can be a valid reason for this choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"49 1","pages":"120-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11141747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_110_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the influence of initial guess or estimate (uniform as "ones" and "zeros" vs. filtered back projection [FBP] image) as an input image for maximum likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) tomographic reconstruction algorithm and provide the curves of error or convergence for each of these three initial estimates.

Methods: Two phantoms, created as digital images, were utilized: one was a simple noiseless object and the other was a more complicated, noise-degraded object of the section of lower thorax in a matrix of 256 × 256 pixels. Both underwent radon transform or forward projection process and the corresponding sinograms were generated. For filtering during tomographic image reconstruction, ramp and Butterworth filters, as high-pass and low-pass ones, were applied to images. The second phantom (lower thorax) was radon-transformed and the resulting sinogram was degraded by noise. As initial guess or estimate images, in addition to FBP tomographic image, two uniform images, one with all pixels having a value of 1 ("ones") and the other with all having zero ("zeros"), were created. The three initial estimates (FBP, ones, and zeros) were reconstructed with iterative MLEM tomographic reconstruction (with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 iterations). The difference between the object and the updated slice was calculated at the end of each iteration (as error matrix), and the mean squared error (MSE) was computed and plotted separately or in conjunction with the MSE curves of other initial estimates. All computations were implemented in MATLAB software.

Results: The results of ones and zeros seemed strikingly similar. The curves of uniform ones and uniform zeros were so close to each other that overlap near-perfectly. However, in the FBP slice as an initial estimate, the resulting tomographic slice was similar with a much higher extent to the object even after 1 or 2 iterations. The pattern of convergence for all three curves was roughly similar. The normalized MSE decreased sharply up to 5 iterations and then, after 10 iterations, the curves reached a plateau until 32 iterations. For the phantom of the lower thorax section with its noise-degraded sinogram, similar to the pattern observed for simple disk-shaped phantom, the curves (normalized MSE) fell sharply up to 10 iterations and then rapidly converged thereafter until 64 iterations.

Conclusion: Similar results are observed when choosing different initial guesses or estimates (uniform vs. FBP) as the starting point, based on the error calculation using MSE. The algorithm converges almost similarly for all initial estimates. Therefore, selecting a uniform initial guess image can be an appropriate choice and may be preferred over an FBP image. Reducing the processing time can be a valid reason for this choice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索初始估计值对断层扫描重建中迭代最大似然期望最大化的影响
目的:探讨初始猜测或估计(统一为 "1 "和 "0 "与滤波后投影[FBP]图像)作为最大似然期望最大化(MLEM)断层重建算法输入图像的影响,并提供这三种初始估计的误差或收敛曲线:方法: 使用两个以数字图像创建的模型:一个是简单的无噪声物体,另一个是更复杂的、噪声衰减的物体,即矩阵为 256 × 256 像素的胸部下部切面。两者都经过了氡变换或正向投影处理,并生成了相应的正弦曲线图。为了在断层图像重建过程中进行滤波,对图像应用了斜坡滤波器和巴特沃斯滤波器(高通和低通滤波器)。第二个模型(下胸腔)经过氡变换,生成的正弦曲线因噪声而退化。作为初始猜测或估计图像,除了 FBP 层析成像图像外,还创建了两幅均匀图像,一幅图像的所有像素值均为 1("1"),另一幅图像的所有像素值均为 0("0")。三个初始估计值(FBP、1 和零)通过迭代 MLEM 层析成像重建(迭代次数分别为 1、2、4、8、16、32 和 64 次)。在每次迭代结束时计算对象与更新切片之间的差异(作为误差矩阵),计算均方误差(MSE),并单独或与其他初始估计的 MSE 曲线一起绘制。所有计算均在 MATLAB 软件中实现:1和0的结果似乎惊人地相似。均匀一和均匀零的曲线非常接近,几乎完全重合。然而,以 FBP 切片作为初始估计,即使经过 1 或 2 次迭代,所得到的断层切片与物体的范围也相差无几。三条曲线的收敛模式大致相似。归一化 MSE 在迭代 5 次之前急剧下降,然后在迭代 10 次之后曲线趋于平稳,直到迭代 32 次。对于下胸部剖面幻影及其噪声衰减正弦曲线,与简单圆盘形幻影观察到的模式类似,曲线(归一化 MSE)在迭代 10 次之前急剧下降,之后迅速收敛,直到迭代 64 次:根据使用 MSE 计算误差的结果,在选择不同的初始猜测或估计(均匀与 FBP)作为起点时,也能观察到类似的结果。所有初始估计值的算法收敛情况几乎相似。因此,选择统一的初始猜测图像可能是一个合适的选择,比 FBP 图像更可取。缩短处理时间也是这一选择的合理理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Physics
Journal of Medical Physics RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
A Segmentation-based Automated Calculation of Patient Size and Size-specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric Computed Tomography Scans. A Study on Radiation Level at the Treatment Plane Due to Induced Activity in Linear Accelerator Head. Advancements and Applications of Three-dimensional Printing Technology in Surgery. Agar-based Phantom for Evaluating Targeting of High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Systems for Breast Ablation. An Analysis of Radiotherapy Machine Requirements in India: Impact of the Pandemic and Regional Disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1