Anterolateral Dual Plate Fixation for Distal Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Junction Fractures of the Humerus: Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis with Clinical Results.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.4055/cios23376
Cheungsoo Ha, Inrak Choi, Jun-Ku Lee, Jongbeom Oh, Wooyeol Ahn, Soo-Hong Han
{"title":"Anterolateral Dual Plate Fixation for Distal Metaphyseal-Diaphyseal Junction Fractures of the Humerus: Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis with Clinical Results.","authors":"Cheungsoo Ha, Inrak Choi, Jun-Ku Lee, Jongbeom Oh, Wooyeol Ahn, Soo-Hong Han","doi":"10.4055/cios23376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the humerus are a subset of injuries between humeral shaft fractures and distal intra-articular humerus fractures. A lack of space for distal fixation and the unique anatomy of concave curvature create difficulties during operative treatment. The closely lying radial nerve is another major concern. The aim of this study was to determine whether anterolateral dual plate fixation could be effective for a distal junctional fracture of the humerus both biomechanically and clinically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A right humerus 3-dimensional (3D) model was obtained based on plain radiographs and computed tomography data of patients. Two fractures, a spiral type and a spiral wedge type, were constructed. Three-dimensional models of locking compression plates and screws were constructed using materials provided by the manufacturer. The experiment was conducted by using COMSOL Multiphysics, a finite element analysis, solver, and simulation software package. For the clinical study, from July 2008 to March 2021, a total of 72 patients were included. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed to obtain patient demographics, elbow range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS), and hand grip strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No fracture fixation construct completely restored stiffness comparable to the intact model in torsion or compression. Combinations of the 7-hole and 5-hole plates and the 8-hole and 6-hole plates showed superior structural stiffness and stress than those with single lateral plates. At least 3 screws (6 cortices) should be inserted into the lateral plate to reduce the load effectively. For the anterior plate, it was sufficient to purchase only the near cortex. Regarding clinical results of the surgery, the range of motion showed satisfactory results in elbow flexion, elbow extension, and forearm rotation. The average DASH score was 4.3 and the average MEPS was 88.2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterolateral dual plate fixation was biomechanically superior to the single-plate method in the finite element analysis of a distal junctional fracture of the humerus model. Anterolateral dual plate fixation was also clinically effective in a large cohort of patients with distal junctional fractures of the humerus.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11130622/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23376","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fractures of the humerus are a subset of injuries between humeral shaft fractures and distal intra-articular humerus fractures. A lack of space for distal fixation and the unique anatomy of concave curvature create difficulties during operative treatment. The closely lying radial nerve is another major concern. The aim of this study was to determine whether anterolateral dual plate fixation could be effective for a distal junctional fracture of the humerus both biomechanically and clinically.

Methods: A right humerus 3-dimensional (3D) model was obtained based on plain radiographs and computed tomography data of patients. Two fractures, a spiral type and a spiral wedge type, were constructed. Three-dimensional models of locking compression plates and screws were constructed using materials provided by the manufacturer. The experiment was conducted by using COMSOL Multiphysics, a finite element analysis, solver, and simulation software package. For the clinical study, from July 2008 to March 2021, a total of 72 patients were included. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed to obtain patient demographics, elbow range of motion, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, Mayo Elbow Performance Scores (MEPS), and hand grip strength.

Results: No fracture fixation construct completely restored stiffness comparable to the intact model in torsion or compression. Combinations of the 7-hole and 5-hole plates and the 8-hole and 6-hole plates showed superior structural stiffness and stress than those with single lateral plates. At least 3 screws (6 cortices) should be inserted into the lateral plate to reduce the load effectively. For the anterior plate, it was sufficient to purchase only the near cortex. Regarding clinical results of the surgery, the range of motion showed satisfactory results in elbow flexion, elbow extension, and forearm rotation. The average DASH score was 4.3 and the average MEPS was 88.2.

Conclusions: Anterolateral dual plate fixation was biomechanically superior to the single-plate method in the finite element analysis of a distal junctional fracture of the humerus model. Anterolateral dual plate fixation was also clinically effective in a large cohort of patients with distal junctional fractures of the humerus.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肱骨远端骺端-骺端交界处骨折的前外侧双钢板固定:生物力学有限元分析与临床结果。
背景:肱骨远端干骺端-二骺端交界处骨折是介于肱骨轴骨折和肱骨远端关节内骨折之间的一种损伤。由于缺乏远端固定的空间以及凹陷弧度的独特解剖结构,给手术治疗带来了困难。紧邻的桡神经是另一个主要问题。本研究的目的是确定前外侧双钢板固定是否能在生物力学和临床上有效治疗肱骨远端交界处骨折:方法:根据患者的普通X光片和计算机断层扫描数据,建立了右肱骨三维(3D)模型。构建了螺旋型和螺旋楔型两种骨折。使用制造商提供的材料构建了锁定加压钢板和螺钉的三维模型。实验使用 COMSOL Multiphysics(一种有限元分析、求解和模拟软件包)进行。在 2008 年 7 月至 2021 年 3 月的临床研究中,共纳入了 72 名患者。研究人员回顾性地查看了他们的病历,以了解患者的人口统计学特征、肘关节活动范围、手臂、肩部和手部残疾(DASH)评分、梅奥肘关节表现评分(MEPS)以及手部握力:结果:没有一种骨折固定结构能完全恢复与完整模型相当的扭转或压缩刚度。与单侧钢板相比,7孔和5孔钢板以及8孔和6孔钢板的组合显示出更好的结构刚度和应力。侧板中至少应插入 3 个螺钉(6 个皮质),才能有效减轻负荷。对于前方钢板,只需购买近端皮质即可。关于手术的临床效果,肘关节屈曲、肘关节伸展和前臂旋转的活动范围均显示出令人满意的结果。DASH评分平均为4.3分,MEPS平均为88.2分:结论:在肱骨远端交界处骨折模型的有限元分析中,前外侧双钢板固定在生物力学上优于单钢板固定。在大量肱骨远端连接部骨折患者中,前外侧双钢板固定在临床上也很有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Atraumatic Sport-Related Medial Sesamoid Pain: Conservative Treatment Outcome and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features. Cemented Versus Uncemented Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures: National Shoulder Arthroplasty Data from Türkiye. Comparison of Midterm Outcomes between All-Inside Arthroscopic and Open Modified Broström Procedures as Treatment for Chronic Ankle Instability. Does the Nonunion Rate of Atypical Femoral Fractures Differ According to Fracture Site?: A Meta-Analysis. Isolated Polyethylene Insert Exchange for Instability after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparable Survival Rates and Range of Motion and Improved Clinical Scores Regardless of Hyperextension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1