Resistance Training with Instability Does Not Hamper Total Training Volume and Muscle Strength Gains in Older Adults: a Secondary Analysis from REI Study.

IF 1.6 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Canadian Geriatrics Journal Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.5770/cgj.27.730
Yslaíny Araújo Silva, Bruno Remígio Cavalcante, Letícia Bojikian Calixtre, Milena Lucilla Lacio Tomaz, Mariana Ferreira de Souza, Ana Carolina Rodarti Pitangui, Rodrigo Cappato de Araújo
{"title":"Resistance Training with Instability Does Not Hamper Total Training Volume and Muscle Strength Gains in Older Adults: a Secondary Analysis from REI Study.","authors":"Yslaíny Araújo Silva, Bruno Remígio Cavalcante, Letícia Bojikian Calixtre, Milena Lucilla Lacio Tomaz, Mariana Ferreira de Souza, Ana Carolina Rodarti Pitangui, Rodrigo Cappato de Araújo","doi":"10.5770/cgj.27.730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resistance training with instability (REI) emerged as a promising training modality for older adults aiming to counteract age-related changes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We compared the effects of 12 weeks of REI and traditional resistance exercise (RE) on muscle strength in older adults with cognitive impairment. We further explored if total training volume (TTV) significantly differs among training groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of the REI study. Participants were randomly assigned to REI (n=22) or RE (n=23). RE protocol involved moderate-intensity, free-weight, and machines-based resistance exercises (3 sets, 10-15 repetitions). REI received a similar training protocol, in which exercises were simultaneously performed with instability/unstable devices (e.g., squat exercise under a foam pad or Bosu<sup>®</sup> ball). Maximal isometric strength and isokinetic parameters were assessed at baseline and after completion of a 12-week intervention through a hydraulic handgrip and isokinetic dynamometer, respectively. TTV (sets × repetitions × load) was computed based on external training load over the 12 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed between groups (<i>p</i>=.35) after the intervention. Over 12 weeks, REI and RE improved isometric handgrip strength (<i>p</i><.001) and isokinetic performance (<i>p</i>=.04). We also did not find differences in the TTV between training groups (<i>p</i>=.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrated that both REI and RE training induced similar gains in muscle strength. Combining unstable surfaces/instability devices did not hamper TTV, which may have clinical applications in the context of exercise for older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":56182,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","volume":"27 2","pages":"133-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11100977/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geriatrics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.27.730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resistance training with instability (REI) emerged as a promising training modality for older adults aiming to counteract age-related changes.

Objectives: We compared the effects of 12 weeks of REI and traditional resistance exercise (RE) on muscle strength in older adults with cognitive impairment. We further explored if total training volume (TTV) significantly differs among training groups.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the REI study. Participants were randomly assigned to REI (n=22) or RE (n=23). RE protocol involved moderate-intensity, free-weight, and machines-based resistance exercises (3 sets, 10-15 repetitions). REI received a similar training protocol, in which exercises were simultaneously performed with instability/unstable devices (e.g., squat exercise under a foam pad or Bosu® ball). Maximal isometric strength and isokinetic parameters were assessed at baseline and after completion of a 12-week intervention through a hydraulic handgrip and isokinetic dynamometer, respectively. TTV (sets × repetitions × load) was computed based on external training load over the 12 weeks.

Results: No differences were observed between groups (p=.35) after the intervention. Over 12 weeks, REI and RE improved isometric handgrip strength (p<.001) and isokinetic performance (p=.04). We also did not find differences in the TTV between training groups (p=.28).

Conclusion: We demonstrated that both REI and RE training induced similar gains in muscle strength. Combining unstable surfaces/instability devices did not hamper TTV, which may have clinical applications in the context of exercise for older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带有不稳定性的阻力训练不会妨碍老年人的总训练量和肌肉力量增长:REI 研究的二次分析。
背景:具有不稳定性的阻力训练(REI)是一种很有前途的训练方式,适用于老年人,旨在对抗与年龄有关的变化:我们比较了为期 12 周的 REI 和传统阻力训练(RE)对认知障碍老年人肌肉力量的影响。我们进一步探讨了不同训练组的总训练量(TTV)是否存在显著差异:这是 REI 研究的二次分析。参与者被随机分配到 REI(22 人)或 RE(23 人)组。RE 方案包括中等强度、自由重量和器械阻力练习(3 组,重复 10-15 次)。REI 采用类似的训练方案,但同时使用不稳定/不稳定装置(如在泡沫垫或 Bosu® 球下进行深蹲练习)进行练习。最大等长力量和等动参数分别在基线和完成为期 12 周的干预后通过液压手握式测力计和等动式测力计进行评估。根据 12 周的外部训练负荷计算 TTV(组数 × 重复次数 × 负荷):结果:干预后,组间无差异(P=.35)。在 12 周内,REI 和 RE 改善了等长手握力量(pp=.04)。我们也没有发现训练组之间的 TTV 存在差异(P=.28):我们的研究表明,REI 和 RE 训练对肌肉力量的提高效果相似。结合使用不稳定表面/不稳定装置不会妨碍TTV,这可能在老年人锻炼中具有临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Geriatrics Journal
Canadian Geriatrics Journal Nursing-Gerontology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Canadian Geriatrics Journal (CGJ) is a peer-reviewed publication that is a home for innovative aging research of a high quality aimed at improving the health and the care provided to older persons residing in Canada and outside our borders. While we gratefully accept submissions from researchers outside our country, we are committed to encouraging aging research by Canadians. The CGJ is targeted to family physicians with training or an interest in the care of older persons, specialists in geriatric medicine, geriatric psychiatrists, and members of other health disciplines with a focus on gerontology.
期刊最新文献
"How Can We Help You?" Older Adults' and Care Partners' Perspectives on Improving Care in Hospital: A Mixed Methods Study. Alternate Level of Care Patients in Canada: a Scoping Review. Balancing Patients' Eating Habits with Planetary Health-Pilot Study to Decrease Food Waste with Vegetarian Lunches using a Quality Improvement Approach. Canadian Clinical Guidelines on Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults. Determinants of First Practice Location among Canadian Geriatric Medicine Trainees and Recent Graduates: Findings of a Cross-sectional Survey in 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1