Master's Thesis: Economics or Identity? A Meta-Study of the Principal Determinants of Brexit

Piero Lorenzini
{"title":"Master's Thesis: Economics or Identity? A Meta-Study of the Principal Determinants of Brexit","authors":"Piero Lorenzini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3739397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the Brexit referendum of June 2016 scholars have tried to determine the roots of the vote for leave. Some observers argue that economic factors were key determinants of Brexit, whereas other researchers consider cultural/identity variables as the main causes of the leave vote. This debate forms part of a broader dispute on the factors associated with the growing importance of Eurosceptic populist politics in WesternEurope. In fact, Brexit is widely considered by scholars as an example of the rise of populism (Inglehart and Norris, 2016). This argument takes two basic forms: the Economic Insecurity Thesis (Rodrick, 2018; Boeri, 2018) and the Cultural Insecurity Thesis (Inglehart and Norris, 2016).<br><br>Firstly, this thesis concludes that both set of variables influenced the vote for leave, through a Meta-Study of different research on the principal determinants of Brexit. Secondly, it assesses which studies are the most robust. Finally, it stresses the importance of the interaction between economic and cultural variables in influencing the vote for leave.","PeriodicalId":170522,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions (Topic)","volume":"32 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other European Economics: Labor & Social Conditions (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the Brexit referendum of June 2016 scholars have tried to determine the roots of the vote for leave. Some observers argue that economic factors were key determinants of Brexit, whereas other researchers consider cultural/identity variables as the main causes of the leave vote. This debate forms part of a broader dispute on the factors associated with the growing importance of Eurosceptic populist politics in WesternEurope. In fact, Brexit is widely considered by scholars as an example of the rise of populism (Inglehart and Norris, 2016). This argument takes two basic forms: the Economic Insecurity Thesis (Rodrick, 2018; Boeri, 2018) and the Cultural Insecurity Thesis (Inglehart and Norris, 2016).

Firstly, this thesis concludes that both set of variables influenced the vote for leave, through a Meta-Study of different research on the principal determinants of Brexit. Secondly, it assesses which studies are the most robust. Finally, it stresses the importance of the interaction between economic and cultural variables in influencing the vote for leave.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硕士论文:经济还是身份?英国脱欧主要决定因素的元研究
2016 年 6 月英国脱欧公投后,学者们试图确定脱欧投票的根源。一些观察家认为经济因素是英国脱欧的关键决定因素,而另一些研究者则认为文化/身份变量是脱欧投票的主要原因。这一争论是关于欧洲怀疑论民粹主义政治在西欧日益重要的相关因素的更广泛争论的一部分。事实上,学者们普遍认为英国脱欧是民粹主义兴起的一个例子(Inglehart and Norris, 2016)。这一论点有两种基本形式:经济不安全感论(Rodrick,2018;Boeri,2018)和文化不安全感论(Inglehart and Norris,2016)。首先,本论文通过对英国脱欧主要决定因素的不同研究进行元研究,得出结论认为这两组变量都影响了脱欧投票。其次,论文评估了哪些研究最为可靠。最后,论文强调了经济变量和文化变量之间的相互作用在影响脱欧投票中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Un indice OEE per la stampa delle banconote in Banca d’Italia (An OEE index for the Bank of Italy’s Banknote Production Plant) The Retirement Age and the Pension System, the Labor Market and the Economy (Wiek emerytalny a system emerytalny, rynek pracy i gospodarka) Outsourcing, Inequality and Aggregate Output Swiss National League Goalie Analysis Gender Discrimination? Evidence from the Belgian Public Accounting Profession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1