Are multiple share class funds poorly governed?

Jonathan Handy, Tom Smythe
{"title":"Are multiple share class funds poorly governed?","authors":"Jonathan Handy, Tom Smythe","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v28i1.3415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Utilizing independent Morningstar Stewardship Grades, this article finds that multiple share class mutual funds (MS funds) have lower quality governance. Ordered probit regressions indicate MS funds are more likely to have lower board quality ratings and managerial incentive ratings, additional evidence the MS structure has not provided the benefits initially put forth by supporters. The results continue to demonstrate that less sophisticated investors seeking financial advice (those typically utilizing MS funds) may potentially be directed to funds that underperform and have higher costs.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":" 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Services Review","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v28i1.3415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Utilizing independent Morningstar Stewardship Grades, this article finds that multiple share class mutual funds (MS funds) have lower quality governance. Ordered probit regressions indicate MS funds are more likely to have lower board quality ratings and managerial incentive ratings, additional evidence the MS structure has not provided the benefits initially put forth by supporters. The results continue to demonstrate that less sophisticated investors seeking financial advice (those typically utilizing MS funds) may potentially be directed to funds that underperform and have higher costs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多份额基金是否管理不善?
本文利用独立的晨星管理评级(Morningstar Stewardship Grades)发现,多份额共同基金(MS 基金)的治理质量较低。有序 probit 回归表明,MS 基金的董事会质量评级和管理者激励评级更有可能较低,这进一步证明了 MS 结构并未带来支持者最初提出的好处。研究结果继续表明,寻求财务咨询的不太成熟的投资者(通常使用 MS 基金的投资者)可能会被引导到业绩不佳、成本较高的基金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Portfolio insurance using leveraged ETFs Which measures predict risk taking in a multi-stage controlled investment decision process? Life insurance as a retirement income tool Does the source of money determine retirement investment choices? Does financial risk tolerance change over time?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1