This study examines the use of Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds (LETFs) within a constant proportional portfolio insurance (CPPI) strategy. The advantage of using LETFs in such a strategy is that it allows a greater percentage of the portfolio to be invested in the risk-free rate relative to a traditional CPPI. Where a standard CPPI strategy may require 50% of the portfolio to be invested in equities, using a 2x LETF only requires 25%, and a 3x LETF only requires 16.7% to attain the same effective exposure to equities. Results show when the risk-free asset is yielding at least 3% or the 1 year minus 90-day Treasury exceeds 1%, the use of LETFs within a CPPI framework results in annual returns approximately 1–2% higher with better Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, and Cumulative Prospect Values while reducing Value at Risk (VaR) and Excess Shortfall (ES) below VaR.
{"title":"Portfolio insurance using leveraged ETFs","authors":"Jeffrey George","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3373","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3373","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the use of Leveraged Exchange Traded Funds (LETFs) within a constant proportional portfolio insurance (CPPI) strategy. The advantage of using LETFs in such a strategy is that it allows a greater percentage of the portfolio to be invested in the risk-free rate relative to a traditional CPPI. Where a standard CPPI strategy may require 50% of the portfolio to be invested in equities, using a 2x LETF only requires 25%, and a 3x LETF only requires 16.7% to attain the same effective exposure to equities. Results show when the risk-free asset is yielding at least 3% or the 1 year minus 90-day Treasury exceeds 1%, the use of LETFs within a CPPI framework results in annual returns approximately 1–2% higher with better Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, and Cumulative Prospect Values while reducing Value at Risk (VaR) and Excess Shortfall (ES) below VaR.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"12 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134993179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This study examines whether people use different mental accounts for different types of hypothetical revenue windfalls rather than viewing them as fungible in their use consistent with neoclassical economics. This study finds that the income source sometimes influenced the amount spent/saved and a respondent’s general default as a spender or saver was highly significant in all regressions. This article adds to the literature by responding to Epley and Gneezy’s (2007) call for “a broader sample of participants, varying amounts of payment, and alternative frames” to identify moderators of windfall framing effects with implications for behavioral economic theory and financial planning.
{"title":"Does the source of a cash flow affect spending versus saving?","authors":"Valrie Chambers, Eugene Bland, Marilyn Spencer","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3324","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3324","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines whether people use different mental accounts for different types of hypothetical revenue windfalls rather than viewing them as fungible in their use consistent with neoclassical economics. This study finds that the income source sometimes influenced the amount spent/saved and a respondent’s general default as a spender or saver was highly significant in all regressions. This article adds to the literature by responding to Epley and Gneezy’s (2007) call for “a broader sample of participants, varying amounts of payment, and alternative frames” to identify moderators of windfall framing effects with implications for behavioral economic theory and financial planning.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"67 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136348258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We assess the ability of different risk profiling measures to predict risk taking along a multistage process that reflects individuals’ discovery of their willingness to take risks. We find that the individual willingness to take risks varies along the process, but its level is always related to a composite measure of the individual risk tolerance. Assessment of the risk tolerance cannot be substituted by a simulated experience, although the latter can improve the perception of the risk and reward potential of the investment and motivate higher risk taking. The risk tolerance measure addresses different notions of risk, but we found that the individual loss aversion is the most powerful predictor of risk taking at all stages of the discovery process. By contrast, we found that neither the self-assessed risk tolerance measures nor the investment experience are suitable for consistently predicting risk taking at different stages of the process.
{"title":"Which measures predict risk taking in a multi-stage controlled investment decision process?","authors":"Kremena Bachmann, Thorsten Hens, Remo Stössel","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3371","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3371","url":null,"abstract":"We assess the ability of different risk profiling measures to predict risk taking along a multistage process that reflects individuals’ discovery of their willingness to take risks. We find that the individual willingness to take risks varies along the process, but its level is always related to a composite measure of the individual risk tolerance. Assessment of the risk tolerance cannot be substituted by a simulated experience, although the latter can improve the perception of the risk and reward potential of the investment and motivate higher risk taking. The risk tolerance measure addresses different notions of risk, but we found that the individual loss aversion is the most powerful predictor of risk taking at all stages of the discovery process. By contrast, we found that neither the self-assessed risk tolerance measures nor the investment experience are suitable for consistently predicting risk taking at different stages of the process.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"11 7","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134993186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Financial planners work in an environment that requires the documentation of a client’s financial attitudes and preferences. Financial risk tolerance is one such attitudinal construct that is generally required by regulators to be evaluated. While there are numerous commercial and academic products used to assess client risk attitudes, questions have been raised over the past several decades regarding the stability of scores from risk-tolerance tools. Specifically, financial planners, as well as regulators, require evidence documenting to what extent risk tolerance changes over time, and if changes do occur, the variables associated with variability. The purpose of this study was to address these needs. Based on a model that included macroeconomic indicators, biopsychosocial and environmental factors, and measures of social support, it was determined that risk-tolerance attitudes remain generally stable over time. However, there are groups of test takers that exhibit significant shifts in risk tolerance. This article describes some of the variables associated with these score changes, as well as providing financial planning professionals with guidance on how to identify clients who may be prone to shifting their tolerance for financial risk.
{"title":"Does financial risk tolerance change over time?","authors":"Stephen Kuzniak, John Grable","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3370","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3370","url":null,"abstract":"Financial planners work in an environment that requires the documentation of a client’s financial attitudes and preferences. Financial risk tolerance is one such attitudinal construct that is generally required by regulators to be evaluated. While there are numerous commercial and academic products used to assess client risk attitudes, questions have been raised over the past several decades regarding the stability of scores from risk-tolerance tools. Specifically, financial planners, as well as regulators, require evidence documenting to what extent risk tolerance changes over time, and if changes do occur, the variables associated with variability. The purpose of this study was to address these needs. Based on a model that included macroeconomic indicators, biopsychosocial and environmental factors, and measures of social support, it was determined that risk-tolerance attitudes remain generally stable over time. However, there are groups of test takers that exhibit significant shifts in risk tolerance. This article describes some of the variables associated with these score changes, as well as providing financial planning professionals with guidance on how to identify clients who may be prone to shifting their tolerance for financial risk.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"67 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136348256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Given its tax-preferential treatment, careful study is warranted to determine whether life insurance can play an important role in an overall retirement portfolio. This study develops hypothetical scenarios for different types of individuals with varying ages and distribution periods, while using a historical outlook to determine the proper structure of a variable universal life insurance policy. We compare a variable universal life policy to different investment vehicles (both in qualified and non-qualified accounts) on an after-tax basis to better understand the potential tradeoff for tax-deferral and insurance fees within life insurance.
{"title":"Life insurance as a retirement income tool","authors":"Russell DeLibero, Wade D. Pfau","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3311","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3311","url":null,"abstract":"Given its tax-preferential treatment, careful study is warranted to determine whether life insurance can play an important role in an overall retirement portfolio. This study develops hypothetical scenarios for different types of individuals with varying ages and distribution periods, while using a historical outlook to determine the proper structure of a variable universal life insurance policy. We compare a variable universal life policy to different investment vehicles (both in qualified and non-qualified accounts) on an after-tax basis to better understand the potential tradeoff for tax-deferral and insurance fees within life insurance.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"9 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134993196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Using a unique dataset of actual investment choices of Oregon State University employees, we investigate how investment choices differ among (1) the optional retirement plan (ORP) funded by the employer and (2) the investments in 403(b) accounts funded by employees themselves using voluntary salary reduction. We find that the level of risk associated with voluntary, salary reduction investments in 403(b) accounts is lower than the risk these same employees are currently taking in their employer funded 401(a) accounts. We also investigate whether the choice of the provider has a significant impact on the asset allocation chosen by the employees and find that participant investment choices in Fidelity are riskier than the choices made by those in TIAA-CREF.
{"title":"Does the source of money determine retirement investment choices?","authors":"Andrea Anthony, Kristine Beck, Inga Chira","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i3.3321","url":null,"abstract":"Using a unique dataset of actual investment choices of Oregon State University employees, we investigate how investment choices differ among (1) the optional retirement plan (ORP) funded by the employer and (2) the investments in 403(b) accounts funded by employees themselves using voluntary salary reduction. We find that the level of risk associated with voluntary, salary reduction investments in 403(b) accounts is lower than the risk these same employees are currently taking in their employer funded 401(a) accounts. We also investigate whether the choice of the provider has a significant impact on the asset allocation chosen by the employees and find that participant investment choices in Fidelity are riskier than the choices made by those in TIAA-CREF.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"67 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136348255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The determinants of seeking five types of financial advice are examined and are found to be consistent across the different types of advice. In addition, no significant differences are found among subsamples defined by gender, age, and financial literacy. Income and risk tolerance are related positively to the demand for financial advice and more greatly affect the probability of seeking advice than do other variables. A low perception of financial knowledge, which can be a proxy for self-confidence, and financial fragility decrease the probability of seeking financial advice.
{"title":"Who seeks financial advice?","authors":"Maher H. Alyousif, Charlene M. Kalenkoski","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i4.3374","url":null,"abstract":"The determinants of seeking five types of financial advice are examined and are found to be consistent across the different types of advice. In addition, no significant differences are found among subsamples defined by gender, age, and financial literacy. Income and risk tolerance are related positively to the demand for financial advice and more greatly affect the probability of seeking advice than do other variables. A low perception of financial knowledge, which can be a proxy for self-confidence, and financial fragility decrease the probability of seeking financial advice.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"62 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136348873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This research extends previous literature on the relationship between financial literacy and financial advice seeking in three ways: (1) we examine financial planner use specifically within the context of retirement planning, (2) we incorporate Huston’s (2010) framework of financial literacy, and (3) we use longitudinal data to investigate the initiation, maintenance, and termination of financial planner use. Results from the 2010 and 2012 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) show a positive association between the components of financial literacy and financial planner use for retirement planning.
{"title":"Exploring the demand for retirement planning advice:","authors":"Martin Seay, Kyoung Tae Kim, Stuart Heckman","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v25i4.3226","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v25i4.3226","url":null,"abstract":"This research extends previous literature on the relationship between financial literacy and financial advice seeking in three ways: (1) we examine financial planner use specifically within the context of retirement planning, (2) we incorporate Huston’s (2010) framework of financial literacy, and (3) we use longitudinal data to investigate the initiation, maintenance, and termination of financial planner use. Results from the 2010 and 2012 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 (NLSY79) show a positive association between the components of financial literacy and financial planner use for retirement planning.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136183469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article examines the financial literacy of the Generation Y age cohort and explores how personality traits influence individual’s financial knowledge. Using a detailed financial literacy survey, multiple areas of financial literacy are measured (investments, budgeting, economics, risk management, and retirement planning) along with the well-known Big Five personality traits. The findings of this article suggest that the Generation Y cohort is more knowledgeable in budgeting and risk management segments of financial literacy but lack knowledge in retirement planning. Secondly, extraversion and conscientiousness are both important personality traits when regressed on individuals overall financial literacy levels. These finding help develop the insights into how behavioral and personality traits influence the cognitive and financial decision-making ability of individuals.
{"title":"financial literacy of Generation Y and the influence that personality traits have on financial knowledge","authors":"Robert Killins","doi":"10.61190/fsr.v26i2.3305","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.61190/fsr.v26i2.3305","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the financial literacy of the Generation Y age cohort and explores how personality traits influence individual’s financial knowledge. Using a detailed financial literacy survey, multiple areas of financial literacy are measured (investments, budgeting, economics, risk management, and retirement planning) along with the well-known Big Five personality traits. The findings of this article suggest that the Generation Y cohort is more knowledgeable in budgeting and risk management segments of financial literacy but lack knowledge in retirement planning. Secondly, extraversion and conscientiousness are both important personality traits when regressed on individuals overall financial literacy levels. These finding help develop the insights into how behavioral and personality traits influence the cognitive and financial decision-making ability of individuals.","PeriodicalId":100530,"journal":{"name":"Financial Services Review","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"136184798","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：