An Examination of the Practicability of Antony Duff and John Gardner’s Legal Moralism as a Basis of Criminalisation in Contemporary English Criminal Law

LSE Law Review Pub Date : 2020-03-18 DOI:10.61315/lselr.82
Thomas Yeon
{"title":"An Examination of the Practicability of Antony Duff and John Gardner’s Legal Moralism as a Basis of Criminalisation in Contemporary English Criminal Law","authors":"Thomas Yeon","doi":"10.61315/lselr.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article criticallyexamines the role played by moral values in the scope and structure of criminal offences. In analysing the nature and practicality of legal moralism as a basis of criminalisation, comparisons will be made to notions of responsibility and judgement, and public accounts of criminal law. For focusing on the use of notions of morality per se, this article will not discuss in detail the differences between accounts of legal moralism and public morality. Based on the account of legal moralism advanced by Antony Duff and John Gardner, this article seeks to offer a revised and more nuanced account of the role played by legal moralism in offering a comprehensive account of the scope and structure of criminalisation based on moral wrongs and the State’s jurisdiction in punishing others.","PeriodicalId":514338,"journal":{"name":"LSE Law Review","volume":" 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61315/lselr.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article criticallyexamines the role played by moral values in the scope and structure of criminal offences. In analysing the nature and practicality of legal moralism as a basis of criminalisation, comparisons will be made to notions of responsibility and judgement, and public accounts of criminal law. For focusing on the use of notions of morality per se, this article will not discuss in detail the differences between accounts of legal moralism and public morality. Based on the account of legal moralism advanced by Antony Duff and John Gardner, this article seeks to offer a revised and more nuanced account of the role played by legal moralism in offering a comprehensive account of the scope and structure of criminalisation based on moral wrongs and the State’s jurisdiction in punishing others.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安东尼-达夫和约翰-加德纳的法律道德主义作为当代英国刑法中定罪依据的实用性研究
本文批判性地探讨了道德价值观在刑事犯罪的范围和结构中所扮演的角色。在分析作为刑事定罪基础的法律道德主义的性质和实用性时,将与责任和判断的概念以及刑法的公共论述进行比较。由于侧重于道德概念本身的使用,本文将不详细讨论法律道德主义与公共道德之间的差异。本文以安东尼-达夫(Antony Duff)和约翰-加德纳(John Gardner)对法律道德主义的论述为基础,试图对法律道德主义在全面论述基于道德错误的刑事定罪的范围和结构以及国家在惩罚他人方面的管辖权时所发挥的作用进行修正,并提出更细致的论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Licensee Called - He Wants His Peace Back! Fighting for IP Equity: A Zoom on the Forthcoming Who Pandemic Agreement Complicating the Comparative Taxonomy: the Impact on Corporate Governance of the Dynamic Interaction of Creditors and Shareholders Couzens and Carrick – Whole Life Orders for Police Officers after R v Couzens [2022] EWCA Crim 1063 How Can the Law Address the Effects of Algorithmic Bias in the Healthcare Context?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1