Deep Learning Methods for Detecting Chilli Pests: A Novel Performance Analysis

Kantha Raju Kanaparthi, S. S. Ilango
{"title":"Deep Learning Methods for Detecting Chilli Pests: A Novel Performance Analysis","authors":"Kantha Raju Kanaparthi, S. S. Ilango","doi":"10.12912/27197050/187071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ensuring food security is a top goal for all nations, yet infected plants can negatively impact agricultural production and the country’s economic resources. In the past, farmers have depended on conventional techniques to enhance crop yield. In recent times, there has been a significant decline in crop production due to pest infestations on Chilli crops. The progress of deep learning techniques facilitates the categorization of diverse sorts of images in practical applications. Especially, detecting multi-class Chilli crop pests with good accuracy using deep learning algorithms is consistently a significant challenge. The proposed study concentrated in identifying pests on Chilli leaves using deep learning methods such as YOLOv5 and YOLOv7. To improve classification accuracy, a new and unique dataset called the standard balanced custom ‘Chilli pest dataset’ is created with 13,414 pest images. This dataset includes three specific pest classes: Black Thrips, Redmites, and White Fly. We analysed the custom Chilli dataset using YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 to evaluate their effectiveness in detecting pests in Chilli crops and obtained novel detection performance metrics. The resultant parameters mean Average Precision (mAP) for all three pest classes is 98.6% for YOLOv5 and 86.1% for YOLOv7. The YOLOv5s detector demonstrates superior performance compared to the YOLOv7 pest classification, with a 12.5% improvement. The YOLOv7 algorithm achieves its best classification accuracy (86.1%) at a lower epoch (110), while the YOLOv5 algorithm achieves its highest classification accuracy (98.6%) at a higher epoch (350). Nevertheless, despite this distinction, the YOLOv5 algo - rithm is recommended as the superior detector for accurately identifying pests in well-balanced multi-class pest type datasets, in comparison to YOLOv7, VGG-16 (~92.7%), and VGG-19 (~84.24%) deep learning architectures.","PeriodicalId":448145,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology","volume":"35 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/187071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring food security is a top goal for all nations, yet infected plants can negatively impact agricultural production and the country’s economic resources. In the past, farmers have depended on conventional techniques to enhance crop yield. In recent times, there has been a significant decline in crop production due to pest infestations on Chilli crops. The progress of deep learning techniques facilitates the categorization of diverse sorts of images in practical applications. Especially, detecting multi-class Chilli crop pests with good accuracy using deep learning algorithms is consistently a significant challenge. The proposed study concentrated in identifying pests on Chilli leaves using deep learning methods such as YOLOv5 and YOLOv7. To improve classification accuracy, a new and unique dataset called the standard balanced custom ‘Chilli pest dataset’ is created with 13,414 pest images. This dataset includes three specific pest classes: Black Thrips, Redmites, and White Fly. We analysed the custom Chilli dataset using YOLOv5 and YOLOv7 to evaluate their effectiveness in detecting pests in Chilli crops and obtained novel detection performance metrics. The resultant parameters mean Average Precision (mAP) for all three pest classes is 98.6% for YOLOv5 and 86.1% for YOLOv7. The YOLOv5s detector demonstrates superior performance compared to the YOLOv7 pest classification, with a 12.5% improvement. The YOLOv7 algorithm achieves its best classification accuracy (86.1%) at a lower epoch (110), while the YOLOv5 algorithm achieves its highest classification accuracy (98.6%) at a higher epoch (350). Nevertheless, despite this distinction, the YOLOv5 algo - rithm is recommended as the superior detector for accurately identifying pests in well-balanced multi-class pest type datasets, in comparison to YOLOv7, VGG-16 (~92.7%), and VGG-19 (~84.24%) deep learning architectures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测辣椒害虫的深度学习方法:新颖的性能分析
确保粮食安全是所有国家的首要目标,但受感染的植物会对农业生产和国家经济资源造成负面影响。过去,农民依靠传统技术来提高作物产量。近来,由于辣椒作物遭受虫害,作物产量大幅下降。深度学习技术的进步有助于在实际应用中对各种图像进行分类。特别是,利用深度学习算法准确检测多类辣椒作物害虫一直是一项重大挑战。本研究的重点是利用 YOLOv5 和 YOLOv7 等深度学习方法识别辣椒叶片上的害虫。为了提高分类准确性,我们创建了一个新的独特数据集,称为标准平衡定制 "辣椒害虫数据集",其中包含 13 414 张害虫图像。该数据集包括三种特定害虫类别:黑蓟马、红蜘蛛和白粉虱。我们使用 YOLOv5 和 YOLOv7 对定制辣椒数据集进行了分析,以评估它们在检测辣椒作物害虫方面的有效性,并获得了新的检测性能指标。结果显示,YOLOv5 和 YOLOv7 对所有三种害虫类别的平均精确度 (mAP) 分别为 98.6% 和 86.1%。与 YOLOv7 害虫分类相比,YOLOv5s 探测器的性能更优越,提高了 12.5%。YOLOv7 算法在较低历时(110)时达到了最佳分类准确率(86.1%),而 YOLOv5 算法在较高历时(350)时达到了最高分类准确率(98.6%)。不过,尽管存在这种差异,但与 YOLOv7、VGG-16(约 92.7%)和 VGG-19(约 84.24%)深度学习架构相比,YOLOv5 算法被推荐为在均衡的多类害虫类型数据集中准确识别害虫的更优检测器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Trace Element Correlations in Mussels and Sediments on the Moroccan Mediterranean Coast Analysis of Trends and Impacts of Anthropogenic Factors on Groundwater Quality Investigation into the Feasibility of Using Solar-Powered Household Air Conditioner in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq Assessment of Methane Production Features and Kinetics from Poultry Dropping Waste under Mesophilic Conditions Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of a Renewable Hybrid System in Southern Morocco
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1