Factors related to social inferencing performance in moderate-severe, chronic TBI.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Brain injury Pub Date : 2024-10-14 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2361634
Eleanor S Birch, Brielle C Stark, Dawn Neumann
{"title":"Factors related to social inferencing performance in moderate-severe, chronic TBI.","authors":"Eleanor S Birch, Brielle C Stark, Dawn Neumann","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2361634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Following traumatic brain injury (TBI), deficits in social cognition are common. Social inferencing is a crucial component of social cognition that enables an individual to understand the thoughts, feelings, and intentions of a communication partner when this information is not explicitly stated. Existing literature suggests a variety of factors contribute to social inferencing success (e.g. biological sex, executive functioning), yet findings are not conclusive, largely because these factors have been examined in isolation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, stepwise regression with cross validation was used to examine the extent that several theoretically motivated factors were associated with social inferencing (measured by performance on The Awareness of Social Inference Test [TASIT]) in adult participants with TBI (<i>n</i> = 105). Demographic information, executive functioning, aggression, emotional functioning measures, and participation in society were all examined in relation to social inferencing performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings confirm the importance of higher-level cognitive skills (i.e. executive functioning) in social inferencing, and advance the literature by underlining the potential importance of productive participation in social inferencing performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study innovatively highlights factors linked with social inferencing skills and, in doing so, how deficits in social inferencing might manifest in the lives of individuals with TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"992-1003"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2361634","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Following traumatic brain injury (TBI), deficits in social cognition are common. Social inferencing is a crucial component of social cognition that enables an individual to understand the thoughts, feelings, and intentions of a communication partner when this information is not explicitly stated. Existing literature suggests a variety of factors contribute to social inferencing success (e.g. biological sex, executive functioning), yet findings are not conclusive, largely because these factors have been examined in isolation.

Method: In this cross-sectional study, stepwise regression with cross validation was used to examine the extent that several theoretically motivated factors were associated with social inferencing (measured by performance on The Awareness of Social Inference Test [TASIT]) in adult participants with TBI (n = 105). Demographic information, executive functioning, aggression, emotional functioning measures, and participation in society were all examined in relation to social inferencing performance.

Results: The findings confirm the importance of higher-level cognitive skills (i.e. executive functioning) in social inferencing, and advance the literature by underlining the potential importance of productive participation in social inferencing performance.

Conclusion: This study innovatively highlights factors linked with social inferencing skills and, in doing so, how deficits in social inferencing might manifest in the lives of individuals with TBI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中重度慢性创伤性脑损伤患者社会推理能力的相关因素。
目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后,社交认知障碍很常见。社交推断是社交认知的一个重要组成部分,它能让人在没有明确表达的情况下理解交流伙伴的想法、情感和意图。现有文献表明,有多种因素(如生理性别、执行功能)会影响社交推断的成功与否,但研究结果尚未得出结论,这主要是因为这些因素都是单独研究的:在这项横断面研究中,我们使用交叉验证逐步回归法来检验几个理论上的因素与患有创伤性脑损伤的成年参与者(n = 105)的社会推理能力(通过社会推理意识测验 [TASIT] 的成绩来衡量)之间的关联程度。人口统计学信息、执行功能、攻击性、情绪功能测量和社会参与都与社会推理能力有关:结果:研究结果证实了高层次认知技能(即执行功能)在社会推理中的重要性,并强调了生产性参与在社会推理表现中的潜在重要性,从而推动了相关文献的研究:本研究创新性地强调了与社交推断技能相关的因素,并由此揭示了社交推断方面的缺陷如何在创伤性脑损伤患者的生活中表现出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
期刊最新文献
Functional network disruptions in youth with concussion using the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Treatment of intractable paradoxical herniation by invasive mechanical ventilation with increased positive end-expiratory pressure: a case report. Assessment of arousal recovery after cardiac arrest using diffusion kurtosis MRI with higher b-values: a pilot study. Redefining adjustment after acquired brain injury. Antiseizure medication possibly potentiates ictal bradycardia: a word of caution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1