Two-year prognosis and cardiovascular disease prevention after acute coronary syndrome: the role of cardiac rehabilitation-a French nationwide study.

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European journal of preventive cardiology Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae194
Jacques Blacher, Valérie Olié, Amélie Gabet, Alexandre Cinaud, Philippe Tuppin, Marie-Christine Iliou, Clémence Grave
{"title":"Two-year prognosis and cardiovascular disease prevention after acute coronary syndrome: the role of cardiac rehabilitation-a French nationwide study.","authors":"Jacques Blacher, Valérie Olié, Amélie Gabet, Alexandre Cinaud, Philippe Tuppin, Marie-Christine Iliou, Clémence Grave","doi":"10.1093/eurjpc/zwae194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the impact of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on optimization of secondary prevention treatments for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), medication persistence, medical follow-up, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The National Health Insurance database was used to identify all patients hospitalized for ACS in France in 2019 and those among them who received CR. Patients' characteristics and outcomes were described and compared between CR and non-CR patients. Poisson regression models were used to identify the impact of CR after adjusting for confounders. A Cox model was fitted to identify the variables related to mortality after adjustment for medication persistence and cardiologic follow-up. In 2019, 22% of 134 846 patients hospitalized for ACS in France received CR within 6 months of their discharge. After 1 year, only 60% of patients who did not receive CR were still taking BASI (combination of beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors) drugs. This rate and the medical follow-up rate were higher in patients who received CR. Two years after the ACS event, patients who received CR had better medical follow-up and lower mortality risk, after adjusting for cofounding variables [adjusted hazard ratio all-cause mortality = 0.65 (0.61-0.69)]. After adjustment for the dispensing of cardiovascular drugs and cardiologic follow-up, the independent effect of CR was not as strong but remained significant [hazard ratio = 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.95)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who received CR after hospitalization for ACS had a better prognosis. Optimization of efficient secondary prevention strategies, improved medication persistence, and enhanced cardiologic follow-up seemed to play a major role.</p>","PeriodicalId":12051,"journal":{"name":"European journal of preventive cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"1939-1947"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae194","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the impact of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on optimization of secondary prevention treatments for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), medication persistence, medical follow-up, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality.

Methods and results: The National Health Insurance database was used to identify all patients hospitalized for ACS in France in 2019 and those among them who received CR. Patients' characteristics and outcomes were described and compared between CR and non-CR patients. Poisson regression models were used to identify the impact of CR after adjusting for confounders. A Cox model was fitted to identify the variables related to mortality after adjustment for medication persistence and cardiologic follow-up. In 2019, 22% of 134 846 patients hospitalized for ACS in France received CR within 6 months of their discharge. After 1 year, only 60% of patients who did not receive CR were still taking BASI (combination of beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors) drugs. This rate and the medical follow-up rate were higher in patients who received CR. Two years after the ACS event, patients who received CR had better medical follow-up and lower mortality risk, after adjusting for cofounding variables [adjusted hazard ratio all-cause mortality = 0.65 (0.61-0.69)]. After adjustment for the dispensing of cardiovascular drugs and cardiologic follow-up, the independent effect of CR was not as strong but remained significant [hazard ratio = 0.90 (95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.95)].

Conclusion: Patients who received CR after hospitalization for ACS had a better prognosis. Optimization of efficient secondary prevention strategies, improved medication persistence, and enhanced cardiologic follow-up seemed to play a major role.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性冠状动脉综合征后两年的预后和心血管疾病预防;心脏康复的作用:一项法国全国性研究。
目的:评估心脏康复(CR)对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)二级预防治疗的优化、药物治疗的持续性、医疗随访、再住院和全因死亡率的影响:方法:利用国家医疗保险数据库确定2019年法国所有因急性冠状动脉综合征住院的患者,以及其中接受CR治疗的患者。对患者的特征和预后进行了描述,并对CR和非CR患者进行了比较。在调整混杂因素后,使用泊松回归模型来确定CR的影响。在调整药物持续性和心脏病学随访后,采用 Cox 模型确定与死亡率相关的变量:2019年,法国134,846名因急性心肌梗死住院的患者中有22%在出院后六个月内接受了CR治疗。一年后,只有60%未接受CR治疗的患者仍在服用BASI药物(β受体阻滞剂、抗血小板药物、他汀类药物和RAAS抑制剂的组合)。在接受 CR 治疗的患者中,这一比例和医疗随访率均较高。发生 ACS 事件两年后,在调整了共因变量后,接受 CR 治疗的患者的医疗随访情况更好,死亡风险更低(调整后全因死亡率 HR = 0.65 [0.61-0.69])。在对心血管药物配发和心脏病学随访进行调整后,CR的独立效应没有那么强,但仍然显著(HR = 0.90 [95%CI:0.84-0.95]):结论:因 ACS 住院后接受 CR 治疗的患者预后较好。结论:因 ACS 住院后接受 CR 治疗的患者预后较好。优化有效的二级预防策略、改善药物治疗的持续性以及加强心脏病学随访似乎发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European journal of preventive cardiology
European journal of preventive cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology (EJPC) is an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC). The journal covers a wide range of scientific, clinical, and public health disciplines related to cardiovascular disease prevention, risk factor management, cardiovascular rehabilitation, population science and public health, and exercise physiology. The categories covered by the journal include classical risk factors and treatment, lifestyle risk factors, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular conditions, concomitant pathological conditions, sport cardiology, diagnostic tests, care settings, epidemiology, pharmacology and pharmacotherapy, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.
期刊最新文献
Traditional Risk Factors, Optimal Cardiovascular Health, and Elevated Lipoprotein(a). Sex differences in myocardial infarction care and outcomes: a longitudinal Scottish National Data-Linkage Study. Albiglutide and atrial fibrillation in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease - insights from the Harmony Outcomes trial. Type D Personality As a Risk Factor for 3-Year Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Their Spouse: A Prospective Cohort Study. Association of Modifiable Lifestyle Risk Factors with High-Sensitivity Troponin T and I Concentrations and Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1