Weight training and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality among older adults.

IF 6.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.1093/ije/dyae074
Prathiyankara Shailendra, Katherine L Baldock, Lok Sze Katrina Li, Jessica Gorzelitz, Charles E Matthews, Britton Trabert, Jason A Bennie, Terry Boyle
{"title":"Weight training and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality among older adults.","authors":"Prathiyankara Shailendra, Katherine L Baldock, Lok Sze Katrina Li, Jessica Gorzelitz, Charles E Matthews, Britton Trabert, Jason A Bennie, Terry Boyle","doi":"10.1093/ije/dyae074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While previous studies indicate muscle-strengthening exercises may reduce mortality risk, further research is needed to increase certainty of the evidence. We investigated overall and dose-response associations between weight training and the risks of all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality in a large cohort of older adults with long follow-up time and a large number of deaths. We also investigated the joint associations of weight training and aerobic exercise with mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Weight training was assessed via self-report in 2004-05 in the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study (USA; n = 216 339), with follow-up to 2019. Cox regression estimated the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between weight training and mortality, after adjusting for confounders including aerobic exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Around 25% of participants [mean age = 69.9 years (standard deviation = 5.4), 58% men] reported engaging in weight training over the past year, and there were 79 107 (37%) deaths. Engaging in any weight training (vs none) was associated with lower risks of all-cause (HR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.93-0.96), CVD (HR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.90-0.95) and cancer mortality (HR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.92-0.98). More time spent in weight training was associated with only marginally greater risk reductions. Larger risk reductions were observed among women than men. Performing both aerobic exercise and weight training conferred the greatest mortality risk reduction; weight training was not associated with mortality risk among participants who did no aerobic exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Performing any amount of weight training lowered mortality risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":14147,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiology","volume":"53 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyae074","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While previous studies indicate muscle-strengthening exercises may reduce mortality risk, further research is needed to increase certainty of the evidence. We investigated overall and dose-response associations between weight training and the risks of all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer mortality in a large cohort of older adults with long follow-up time and a large number of deaths. We also investigated the joint associations of weight training and aerobic exercise with mortality risk.

Methods: Weight training was assessed via self-report in 2004-05 in the National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study (USA; n = 216 339), with follow-up to 2019. Cox regression estimated the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between weight training and mortality, after adjusting for confounders including aerobic exercise.

Results: Around 25% of participants [mean age = 69.9 years (standard deviation = 5.4), 58% men] reported engaging in weight training over the past year, and there were 79 107 (37%) deaths. Engaging in any weight training (vs none) was associated with lower risks of all-cause (HR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.93-0.96), CVD (HR = 0.92; 95% CI = 0.90-0.95) and cancer mortality (HR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.92-0.98). More time spent in weight training was associated with only marginally greater risk reductions. Larger risk reductions were observed among women than men. Performing both aerobic exercise and weight training conferred the greatest mortality risk reduction; weight training was not associated with mortality risk among participants who did no aerobic exercise.

Conclusion: Performing any amount of weight training lowered mortality risk.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体重训练与老年人全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡风险。
背景:尽管以往的研究表明肌肉强化训练可降低死亡风险,但仍需进一步研究以增加证据的确定性。我们研究了体重训练与全因、心血管疾病(CVD)和癌症死亡风险之间的总体关系和剂量反应关系。我们还调查了负重训练和有氧运动与死亡风险的共同关系:美国国立卫生研究院-美国退休人员协会(NIH-AARP)饮食与健康研究(美国;n = 216 339)于 2004-05 年通过自我报告对体重训练进行了评估,随访至 2019 年。在调整了包括有氧运动在内的混杂因素后,Cox回归估算了体重训练与死亡率之间的危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI):约25%的参与者[平均年龄=69.9岁(标准差=5.4),58%为男性]表示在过去一年中进行过负重训练,死亡人数为79 107人(37%)。参加任何重量训练(与不参加重量训练相比)与较低的全因(HR = 0.94;95% CI = 0.93-0.96)、心血管疾病(HR = 0.92;95% CI = 0.90-0.95)和癌症死亡(HR = 0.95;95% CI = 0.92-0.98)风险有关。重量训练时间越长,风险降低幅度越大。与男性相比,女性的风险降低幅度更大。同时进行有氧运动和负重训练可最大程度地降低死亡风险;负重训练与未进行有氧运动的参与者的死亡风险无关:结论:进行任何强度的重量训练都能降低死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of epidemiology
International journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Epidemiology is a vital resource for individuals seeking to stay updated on the latest advancements and emerging trends in the field of epidemiology worldwide. The journal fosters communication among researchers, educators, and practitioners involved in the study, teaching, and application of epidemiology pertaining to both communicable and non-communicable diseases. It also includes research on health services and medical care. Furthermore, the journal presents new methodologies in epidemiology and statistics, catering to professionals working in social and preventive medicine. Published six times a year, the International Journal of Epidemiology provides a comprehensive platform for the analysis of data. Overall, this journal is an indispensable tool for staying informed and connected within the dynamic realm of epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Development of a registration interval correction model for enhancing excess all-cause mortality surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic It's personal: navigating research questions that stem from our lived experiences. Probabilistic bias analysis for exposure misclassification of household income by neighbourhood in a cohort of individuals with colorectal cancer. Ambient temperature exposure and rapid infant weight gain. Staggered interventions with no control groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1