Quality indicators to monitor the quality and safety of care for older people: a scoping review protocol.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JBI evidence synthesis Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.11124/JBIES-23-00212
Timothy J H Lathlean, Maria C Inacio, Johanna Westbrook, Len Gray, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Peter Hibbert, Tracy Comans, Maria Crotty, Steve Wesselingh, Janet K Sluggett, Stephanie Ward, Nasir Wabe, Gillian E Caughey
{"title":"Quality indicators to monitor the quality and safety of care for older people: a scoping review protocol.","authors":"Timothy J H Lathlean, Maria C Inacio, Johanna Westbrook, Len Gray, Jeffrey Braithwaite, Peter Hibbert, Tracy Comans, Maria Crotty, Steve Wesselingh, Janet K Sluggett, Stephanie Ward, Nasir Wabe, Gillian E Caughey","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-23-00212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to identify quality indicators used to monitor the quality and safety of care provided to older people (≥ 65 years old) in 8 care settings: primary care; hospital/acute care; aged care (including residential aged care and home or community care); palliative care; rehabilitation care; care transitions; dementia care; and care in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a need for high-quality, holistic, person-centered care for older people. Older people receive care across multiple care settings, and population-level monitoring of quality and safety of care across settings represents a significant challenge.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>National and international quality indicators used to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of care at the population level for older individuals in the 8 key care settings will be considered for inclusion. English-language quantitative and mixed method studies published from 2012 will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Academic (MEDLINE, Embase) and gray (government websites, clinical guidelines, Google) literature searches will be conducted. A standardized data extraction tool will be used to describe the identified quality indicators and associated tools. Quality indicators will be categorized by key domains (ie, pain, function, consumer experience, service delivery); quality indicator type (structure, process, outcome); and the Institute of Medicine's 6 dimensions of care quality (eg, efficiency, effectiveness, appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability/person-centered, safety). The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/8czun.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":"1857-1865"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-23-00212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to identify quality indicators used to monitor the quality and safety of care provided to older people (≥ 65 years old) in 8 care settings: primary care; hospital/acute care; aged care (including residential aged care and home or community care); palliative care; rehabilitation care; care transitions; dementia care; and care in rural areas.

Introduction: There is a need for high-quality, holistic, person-centered care for older people. Older people receive care across multiple care settings, and population-level monitoring of quality and safety of care across settings represents a significant challenge.

Inclusion criteria: National and international quality indicators used to monitor and evaluate the quality and safety of care at the population level for older individuals in the 8 key care settings will be considered for inclusion. English-language quantitative and mixed method studies published from 2012 will be considered.

Methods: Academic (MEDLINE, Embase) and gray (government websites, clinical guidelines, Google) literature searches will be conducted. A standardized data extraction tool will be used to describe the identified quality indicators and associated tools. Quality indicators will be categorized by key domains (ie, pain, function, consumer experience, service delivery); quality indicator type (structure, process, outcome); and the Institute of Medicine's 6 dimensions of care quality (eg, efficiency, effectiveness, appropriateness, accessibility, acceptability/person-centered, safety). The scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).

Review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/8czun.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
监测老年人护理质量和安全的质量指标:范围界定审查协议。
目标:本综述旨在确定用于监测以下 8 种护理环境中为老年人(≥ 65 岁)提供的护理质量和安全的质量指标:初级护理;医院/急症护理;老年护理(包括老年寄宿护理和家庭或社区护理);姑息护理;康复护理;护理过渡;痴呆症护理;以及农村地区的护理:需要为老年人提供高质量的、全面的、以人为本的老年和健康护理。老年人在多种护理环境中接受护理,而对不同护理环境的护理质量和安全进行人口层面的监测是一项重大挑战:纳入标准:用于监测和评估 8 种主要护理环境中老年人护理质量和安全的国家和国际质量指标将被考虑纳入。将考虑 2012 年以来发表的英文定量研究和混合方法研究:将进行学术(MEDLINE、Embase)和灰色(政府网站、临床指南、Google)文献检索。将使用标准化数据提取工具来描述已确定的质量指标和相关工具。质量指标将按关键领域(即疼痛、功能、消费者体验、服务提供)、质量指标类型(结构、过程、结果)和医学研究所的 6 个护理质量维度(即效率、有效性、适当性、可及性、可接受性/以人为本、安全性)进行分类。范围界定综述将按照 JBI 范围界定综述方法和范围界定综述系统综述和 Meta 分析扩展首选报告项目 (PRISMA-ScR)进行:综述注册:开放科学框架 osf.io/8czun。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
期刊最新文献
Value-based outcome evaluation methods used by occupational therapists in primary care: a scoping review. Parents' and guardians' experiences of barriers and facilitators in accessing autism spectrum disorder diagnostic services for their children: a qualitative systematic review. Evidence on the accreditation of health professionals' education in the WHO Africa region: a scoping review protocol. Barriers and facilitators to designing, maintaining, and utilizing rare disease patient registries: a scoping review protocol. Supporting professional practice transition in undergraduate nursing education: a scoping review protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1