Dangerous Variation or Patient-Centered Care? Palliative Care and Pain Providers' Comfort, Experiences, and Approaches when Treating Cancer Pain With Coexisting Aberrant Behaviors.

IF 1.4 The American journal of hospice & palliative care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1177/10499091241259034
Rachel A Hadler, Rachel Klinedinst, Christopher A Jones, Yuhua Bao, Ravi Pathak, Ali J Zarrabi, William E Rosa
{"title":"Dangerous Variation or Patient-Centered Care? Palliative Care and Pain Providers' Comfort, Experiences, and Approaches when Treating Cancer Pain With Coexisting Aberrant Behaviors.","authors":"Rachel A Hadler, Rachel Klinedinst, Christopher A Jones, Yuhua Bao, Ravi Pathak, Ali J Zarrabi, William E Rosa","doi":"10.1177/10499091241259034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPatients with cancer-related pain are at high risk for aberrant drug use behaviors (ADB), including self-escalation, diversion and concurrent illicit substance or opioid misuse; however, limited evidence is available to guide opioid prescribing for patients with life-limiting illness and concurrent or suspected ADB. We sought to characterize how specialists evaluate for and manage these high-risk behaviors in patients with cancer-related pain.MethodsWe conducted telephonic semi-structured interviews with palliative care and pain medicine providers. Participants discussed their own comfort and experience level with identifying and managing ADB in patients with life-limiting illness. They were subsequently presented with a series of standardized scenarios and asked to describe their concerns and management strategies.Results95 interdisciplinary pain and palliative care specialists were contacted; 37 agreed to participate (38.9%). Analysis of interview contents revealed several central themes: (1) widespread discomfort and anxiety regarding safe and compassionate opioid prescribing for high-risk patients, (2) belief that widely used risk-mitigation tools such as opioid contracts and urine drug screens provided inadequate support for decision-making, and (3) lack of institutional and organizational support and guidance for safe prescribing strategies. Most clinicians reported self-education regarding addiction and alternative prescribing/pain management strategies. Providers varied widely in their willingness to discontinue opioid prescribing in a patient with aberrant behavior and pain associated with life-limiting illness.ConclusionProviders caring for patients demonstrating ADB and cancer-related pain struggle to balance safe prescribing with symptom management. Increased guidance is needed regarding opioid prescribing, monitoring, and discontinuation in high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"489-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241259034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPatients with cancer-related pain are at high risk for aberrant drug use behaviors (ADB), including self-escalation, diversion and concurrent illicit substance or opioid misuse; however, limited evidence is available to guide opioid prescribing for patients with life-limiting illness and concurrent or suspected ADB. We sought to characterize how specialists evaluate for and manage these high-risk behaviors in patients with cancer-related pain.MethodsWe conducted telephonic semi-structured interviews with palliative care and pain medicine providers. Participants discussed their own comfort and experience level with identifying and managing ADB in patients with life-limiting illness. They were subsequently presented with a series of standardized scenarios and asked to describe their concerns and management strategies.Results95 interdisciplinary pain and palliative care specialists were contacted; 37 agreed to participate (38.9%). Analysis of interview contents revealed several central themes: (1) widespread discomfort and anxiety regarding safe and compassionate opioid prescribing for high-risk patients, (2) belief that widely used risk-mitigation tools such as opioid contracts and urine drug screens provided inadequate support for decision-making, and (3) lack of institutional and organizational support and guidance for safe prescribing strategies. Most clinicians reported self-education regarding addiction and alternative prescribing/pain management strategies. Providers varied widely in their willingness to discontinue opioid prescribing in a patient with aberrant behavior and pain associated with life-limiting illness.ConclusionProviders caring for patients demonstrating ADB and cancer-related pain struggle to balance safe prescribing with symptom management. Increased guidance is needed regarding opioid prescribing, monitoring, and discontinuation in high-risk patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危险的变异还是以患者为中心的护理?姑息治疗和疼痛治疗提供者在治疗伴有异常行为的癌症疼痛时的舒适度、经验和方法。
背景:癌症相关疼痛患者是反常药物使用行为(ADB)的高风险人群,包括自我升级、转移和同时滥用非法药物或阿片类药物;然而,用于指导患有生命限制性疾病、同时或疑似有反常药物使用行为的患者阿片类药物处方的证据非常有限。我们试图了解专科医生如何评估和管理癌症相关疼痛患者的这些高危行为:我们对姑息治疗和疼痛医疗提供者进行了半结构化电话访谈。受访者讨论了他们自己在识别和管理局限生命疾病患者的 ADB 方面的舒适度和经验水平。随后,向他们展示了一系列标准化情景,并要求他们描述自己的担忧和管理策略:结果:共联系了 95 名跨学科疼痛与姑息治疗专家,其中 37 人同意参与(38.9%)。对访谈内容的分析揭示了几个核心主题:(1)对高风险患者安全、体恤地开具阿片类药物处方普遍感到不适和焦虑;(2)认为阿片类药物合同和尿液药物筛查等广泛使用的风险缓解工具不足以为决策提供支持;(3)缺乏机构和组织对安全处方策略的支持和指导。大多数临床医生报告说,他们对成瘾和替代处方/疼痛管理策略进行了自我教育。对于行为反常且疼痛与生命垂危疾病相关的患者,医护人员停止阿片类药物处方的意愿存在很大差异:结论:医护人员在护理有反常行为和癌症相关疼痛的患者时,很难在安全处方和症状管理之间取得平衡。需要加强对高危患者阿片类药物处方、监测和停药的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Medical Professionals' Perceptions of and Experiences With Terminally Ill Orthodox Jewish Patients. Associations Between Anticipatory Grief and Post-Bereavement Depression and Post-Loss Grief of Family Members of Dying Patients With Cancer in Palliative Care Units: A Cohort Study. Living Will and Advance Care Planning in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Admitted to Specialistic Home Palliative Care. Towards a Theory of Compassion Fatigue in Palliative Care and Oncology: A Systematic Scoping Review. Actual Roles of Occupational Therapists in Palliative and Hospice Care: A Scoping Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1