Being excluded in the metaverse: Impact of social ostracism on users’ psychological responses and behaviors

IF 20.1 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE International Journal of Information Management Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102808
Taeyeon Kim , Hyungrok Jin , Jaehee Hwang , Nayeon Kim , Jungjae Im , Yonghoon Jeon , Yongjun Sung
{"title":"Being excluded in the metaverse: Impact of social ostracism on users’ psychological responses and behaviors","authors":"Taeyeon Kim ,&nbsp;Hyungrok Jin ,&nbsp;Jaehee Hwang ,&nbsp;Nayeon Kim ,&nbsp;Jungjae Im ,&nbsp;Yonghoon Jeon ,&nbsp;Yongjun Sung","doi":"10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2024.102808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we examine how individuals react to an ostracism experience in the metaverse. Based on the temporal need-threat model and virtual identity discrepancy model, two experimental studies and a critical incident study were conducted to investigate how metaverse ostracism affects individuals’ need for belonging, mood, avatar–self discrepancy, and behavioral intentions, as well as how avatar customization moderates this relationship. The results of Study 1 revealed that ostracized participants perceived a higher threat to the need for belonging, a less positive mood, and a higher avatar–self discrepancy than non-ostracized participants. The results of Study 2 revealed that experiencing ostracism led to a greater perception of avatar–self discrepancy only when participants interacted with others using assigned avatars. The results of a moderated mediation analysis showed that the ostracism experience with assigned avatars increased avatar–self discrepancy, thereby reducing intention to continue using the avatars and revisit the metaverse. The mediation effect was not significant when participants customized their avatars. Study 3 replicated the results of Studies 1 and 2 with a larger sample and provided further insight through a qualitative analysis. The theoretical and practical implications are highlighted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48422,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401224000562","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we examine how individuals react to an ostracism experience in the metaverse. Based on the temporal need-threat model and virtual identity discrepancy model, two experimental studies and a critical incident study were conducted to investigate how metaverse ostracism affects individuals’ need for belonging, mood, avatar–self discrepancy, and behavioral intentions, as well as how avatar customization moderates this relationship. The results of Study 1 revealed that ostracized participants perceived a higher threat to the need for belonging, a less positive mood, and a higher avatar–self discrepancy than non-ostracized participants. The results of Study 2 revealed that experiencing ostracism led to a greater perception of avatar–self discrepancy only when participants interacted with others using assigned avatars. The results of a moderated mediation analysis showed that the ostracism experience with assigned avatars increased avatar–self discrepancy, thereby reducing intention to continue using the avatars and revisit the metaverse. The mediation effect was not significant when participants customized their avatars. Study 3 replicated the results of Studies 1 and 2 with a larger sample and provided further insight through a qualitative analysis. The theoretical and practical implications are highlighted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在元宇宙中被排斥:社会排斥对用户心理反应和行为的影响
在本研究中,我们探讨了个体在元宇宙中遭遇排斥时的反应。基于时间需求-威胁模型和虚拟身份差异模型,我们进行了两项实验研究和一项关键事件研究,以探讨元海外排斥如何影响个体的归属需求、情绪、虚拟化身-自我差异和行为意向,以及虚拟化身定制如何调节这种关系。研究 1 的结果显示,与未受排斥的参与者相比,受排斥的参与者对归属需求的威胁感更高、情绪更不积极、头像-自我差异更大。研究 2 的结果显示,只有当参与者使用指定的化身与他人互动时,被排斥的经历才会导致化身-自我差异感的增加。调节中介分析的结果表明,与指定化身的排斥经历会增加化身-自我差异,从而降低继续使用化身和重访元宇宙的意愿。当参与者定制自己的头像时,中介效应并不显著。研究 3 以更大的样本复制了研究 1 和研究 2 的结果,并通过定性分析提供了进一步的见解。本研究强调了其理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Information Management
International Journal of Information Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
53.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
111
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Information Management (IJIM) is a distinguished, international, and peer-reviewed journal dedicated to providing its readers with top-notch analysis and discussions within the evolving field of information management. Key features of the journal include: Comprehensive Coverage: IJIM keeps readers informed with major papers, reports, and reviews. Topical Relevance: The journal remains current and relevant through Viewpoint articles and regular features like Research Notes, Case Studies, and a Reviews section, ensuring readers are updated on contemporary issues. Focus on Quality: IJIM prioritizes high-quality papers that address contemporary issues in information management.
期刊最新文献
Using the influence of human-as-machine representation for self-improvement products The exploration of users’ perceived value from personalization and virtual conversational agents to enable a smart home assemblage– A mixed method approach Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology for sustainable technologies context Unrequited love? A mixed-methods study of parasocial engagement with social media influencers Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1