Online communication skill training of patients with cancer: A test of the behavioral intention predictive framework for communication skills

Debra L. Roter , Marielle Bugayong , Chenery Lowe , Robert L. Joyner , Anna-Maria Howard , Jennifer Wenzel , Adrian S. Dobs
{"title":"Online communication skill training of patients with cancer: A test of the behavioral intention predictive framework for communication skills","authors":"Debra L. Roter ,&nbsp;Marielle Bugayong ,&nbsp;Chenery Lowe ,&nbsp;Robert L. Joyner ,&nbsp;Anna-Maria Howard ,&nbsp;Jennifer Wenzel ,&nbsp;Adrian S. Dobs","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the Behavioral Intention Predictive Framework's utility in explaining variation in cancer patients' strong behavioral intention (SBI) to use LEAPS (Listen, Educate, Assess, Partner, Support) communication skills after viewing training videos.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ninety-eight patients were enrolled through anonymized online platforms to view LEAPS training videos, complete background and communication questionnaires and report their SBI to use LEAPS skills.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>On average, patients indicated SBI to use 6 of 13 skills and 46% of patients expressed SBI across individual skills. The framework explained 27.7% of the adjusted variance in SBI with significant predictors of frequent past use of LEAPS-related shared decision-making behaviors, poor emotional health, being rarely accompanied to visits and positive ratings of narrative videos. Finally, 21.7% of the adjusted variance in problem communication was explained by infrequent use of LEAPS-related information behaviors, patient accompaniment of another adult and positive narrative scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Patients SBI to use multiple LEAPS skills and past problem communication were explained by framework predictors.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>Despite theoretical and empirical evidence that behavioral intention significantly predicts behavior, it has not been studied in patient communication research. Application of the novel framework to LEAPS training videos contributes an innovative address of this research gap.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100291"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000396/pdfft?md5=02d25eb95a98aba7badd20c43bc67971&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000396-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the Behavioral Intention Predictive Framework's utility in explaining variation in cancer patients' strong behavioral intention (SBI) to use LEAPS (Listen, Educate, Assess, Partner, Support) communication skills after viewing training videos.

Methods

Ninety-eight patients were enrolled through anonymized online platforms to view LEAPS training videos, complete background and communication questionnaires and report their SBI to use LEAPS skills.

Results

On average, patients indicated SBI to use 6 of 13 skills and 46% of patients expressed SBI across individual skills. The framework explained 27.7% of the adjusted variance in SBI with significant predictors of frequent past use of LEAPS-related shared decision-making behaviors, poor emotional health, being rarely accompanied to visits and positive ratings of narrative videos. Finally, 21.7% of the adjusted variance in problem communication was explained by infrequent use of LEAPS-related information behaviors, patient accompaniment of another adult and positive narrative scores.

Conclusion

Patients SBI to use multiple LEAPS skills and past problem communication were explained by framework predictors.

Innovation

Despite theoretical and empirical evidence that behavioral intention significantly predicts behavior, it has not been studied in patient communication research. Application of the novel framework to LEAPS training videos contributes an innovative address of this research gap.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症患者的在线沟通技巧培训:沟通技巧行为意向预测框架测试
目的 评估行为意向预测框架在解释癌症患者观看培训视频后使用LEAPS(倾听、教育、评估、合作、支持)沟通技能的强烈行为意向(SBI)差异方面的实用性.方法 98名患者通过匿名在线平台观看了LEAPS培训视频,完成了背景和沟通调查问卷,并报告了他们使用LEAPS技能的SBI.结果 患者平均表示SBI使用了13种技能中的6种,46%的患者表示SBI使用了各种技能。该框架解释了 27.7% 的调整后 SBI 变异,其中重要的预测因素包括过去经常使用 LEAPS 相关的共同决策行为、情绪不佳、很少有人陪同就诊以及对叙述性视频的积极评价。最后,不经常使用 LEAPS 相关信息行为、患者由其他成年人陪同就诊以及对叙述性视频的积极评分解释了问题交流中 21.7% 的调整后差异。创新尽管理论和经验证据表明行为意向可显著预测行为,但在患者交流研究中尚未对其进行研究。将新框架应用于 LEAPS 培训视频有助于创新性地解决这一研究空白。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring professionals' attitudes toward persistent somatic symptoms: Development, validation, and reliability of the professionals' Attitude to Persistent Somatic Symptoms Questionnaire (PAPSS) Tech + touch: A pilot study to facilitate access to health information technology for Spanish-speaking parents Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum How often are patients recording their healthcare consultations in Australia and why? An online survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1