Philip C. Garnsworthy, Neil Saunders, Jennifer R. Goodman
{"title":"Evaluation of a novel palm-free fat supplement to reduce the carbon footprint of diets for dairy cows","authors":"Philip C. Garnsworthy, Neil Saunders, Jennifer R. Goodman","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Most fat supplements added to dairy diets are derived from palm acid oil or palm fatty acid distillate. There are environmental concerns about palm oil production due to deforestation and high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The objective of this study was to evaluate a palm-free fat supplement, Envirolac. Envirolac contains vegetable oils, marine oils and glycerine encapsulated within a cellulosic fibre-clay mineral carrier matrix. The carrier matrix has small particle size to facilitate rapid rumen passage and minimal interference with rumen digestion. Fifty cows were divided into two balanced groups of 25 cows. Each group received Control (calcium soap of palm fatty acid distilate, 0.5 kg/d) and Envirolac (0.5 kg/d) diets in a crossover design with two feeding periods of four weeks duration, so that each cow received both diets. Envirolac has a lower total fat concentration than the calcium soap, so the feeding rate delivered less total fat. When fed on Envirolac, cows yielded more milk 40.7 v 40.1 kg/d), energy-corrected milk (ECM; 42.9 v 41.3 kg/d) and milk components (1605 v 1514 g fat, 1239 v 1199 g protein, 1871 v 1839 g lactose, per day), and produced milk with higher concentrations of fat (40.1 v 38.6 g/kg) and protein (30.7 v 30.1 g/kg), than when fed on Control. When fed on Envirolac, cows produced milk with higher concentrations of fatty acids (FA) synthesised de novo in the mammary gland (25.5 v 23.6 g/100 g total FA), lower concentration of palmitic acid (35.5 v 37.2 g/100 g total FA), and higher concentrations of some long-chain fatty acids (C20:0, C20:1, C20:3n3, C21:0, C22:0, C22:6n3 and C23:0), than when fed on Control. There was no effect of treatment on dry matter intake (DMI; mean 23.4 kg/d), so feed efficiency was higher (1.83 v 1.76 kg ECM/kg DMI) for Envirolac than Control. There was no effect of treatment on dry matter digestibility (0.73), methane production (433 g/d), methane yield (19.3 g/kg DMI) or methane intensity (10.9 g/kg ECM). Feed carbon footprint of Envirolac was calculated to be 1028 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg DM, which is 0.46 of the value for a calcium soap (2830 g CO<sub>2</sub>eq/kg DM), and reduced feed carbon footprint per kg ECM milk production by 11 %. This study demonstrates that Envirolac can replace palm-based fat supplements in dairy diets to improve feed efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint of milk production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"314 ","pages":"Article 116012"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001408/pdfft?md5=32f4402c88447e22a8bdc324c9c94fb1&pid=1-s2.0-S0377840124001408-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124001408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most fat supplements added to dairy diets are derived from palm acid oil or palm fatty acid distillate. There are environmental concerns about palm oil production due to deforestation and high greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The objective of this study was to evaluate a palm-free fat supplement, Envirolac. Envirolac contains vegetable oils, marine oils and glycerine encapsulated within a cellulosic fibre-clay mineral carrier matrix. The carrier matrix has small particle size to facilitate rapid rumen passage and minimal interference with rumen digestion. Fifty cows were divided into two balanced groups of 25 cows. Each group received Control (calcium soap of palm fatty acid distilate, 0.5 kg/d) and Envirolac (0.5 kg/d) diets in a crossover design with two feeding periods of four weeks duration, so that each cow received both diets. Envirolac has a lower total fat concentration than the calcium soap, so the feeding rate delivered less total fat. When fed on Envirolac, cows yielded more milk 40.7 v 40.1 kg/d), energy-corrected milk (ECM; 42.9 v 41.3 kg/d) and milk components (1605 v 1514 g fat, 1239 v 1199 g protein, 1871 v 1839 g lactose, per day), and produced milk with higher concentrations of fat (40.1 v 38.6 g/kg) and protein (30.7 v 30.1 g/kg), than when fed on Control. When fed on Envirolac, cows produced milk with higher concentrations of fatty acids (FA) synthesised de novo in the mammary gland (25.5 v 23.6 g/100 g total FA), lower concentration of palmitic acid (35.5 v 37.2 g/100 g total FA), and higher concentrations of some long-chain fatty acids (C20:0, C20:1, C20:3n3, C21:0, C22:0, C22:6n3 and C23:0), than when fed on Control. There was no effect of treatment on dry matter intake (DMI; mean 23.4 kg/d), so feed efficiency was higher (1.83 v 1.76 kg ECM/kg DMI) for Envirolac than Control. There was no effect of treatment on dry matter digestibility (0.73), methane production (433 g/d), methane yield (19.3 g/kg DMI) or methane intensity (10.9 g/kg ECM). Feed carbon footprint of Envirolac was calculated to be 1028 g CO2eq/kg DM, which is 0.46 of the value for a calcium soap (2830 g CO2eq/kg DM), and reduced feed carbon footprint per kg ECM milk production by 11 %. This study demonstrates that Envirolac can replace palm-based fat supplements in dairy diets to improve feed efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint of milk production.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.