The effect of bioelectric and manual impressions on quality of complete dentures and quality of life: A cross over pilot study

Aditi Nanda , Modhupa Ghosh , Smiti Bhardwaj , Mahesh Verma , Harsimran Kaur
{"title":"The effect of bioelectric and manual impressions on quality of complete dentures and quality of life: A cross over pilot study","authors":"Aditi Nanda ,&nbsp;Modhupa Ghosh ,&nbsp;Smiti Bhardwaj ,&nbsp;Mahesh Verma ,&nbsp;Harsimran Kaur","doi":"10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.05.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To compare the quality of complete dentures and quality of life of participants rehabilitated by using TENS (Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation) facilitated impression making with manual impressions.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Ten completely edentulous participants were enrolled in the crossover, pilot study. Participants were randomized in 2 groups. Five participants in each group were rehabilitated by dentures fabricated with TENS facilitated definitive impression technique (group T) and conventional impression technique (group C). In group T, Bioelectric border molding was done for the participants, that uses electric stimulation of the nerves supplying the muscles. In group C, incremental border molding using modeling plastic impression compound was carried out. Participants in each group used the dentures for 3 months. After 3 months, OHIP-EDENT questionnaire responses were obtained from the participants to observe the oral health related quality of life. A dental specialist recorded denture quality by Kapur scoring criteria. After one month wash period, the treatment was swapped between the groups. OHIP-EDENT scores and Kapur score were recorded for the alternate dentures after 3 months of use. Descriptive analysis was followed by Mann Whitney test to compare the overall scores between group T and group C for OHIP-EDENT, the scores for individual domains of OHIP-EDENT, and Kapur score for denture evaluation (α = 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The overall OHIP-EDENT scores within each domain were less in group T when compared with the scores in group C and Kapur score for group T was more than group C. The difference was statistically significant i.e. <em>P</em> = 0.002 &amp; 0.003 respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Less OHIP-EDENT scores in group T imply better perception of quality of life of individuals due to better performance of stomatognathic system. The higher Kapur scores in group T signifies better quality of dentures when TENS was used for definitive impression making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16609,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 441-445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824000940/pdfft?md5=91b5a21931856a961588c4131bfb023b&pid=1-s2.0-S2212426824000940-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212426824000940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the quality of complete dentures and quality of life of participants rehabilitated by using TENS (Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation) facilitated impression making with manual impressions.

Material and methods

Ten completely edentulous participants were enrolled in the crossover, pilot study. Participants were randomized in 2 groups. Five participants in each group were rehabilitated by dentures fabricated with TENS facilitated definitive impression technique (group T) and conventional impression technique (group C). In group T, Bioelectric border molding was done for the participants, that uses electric stimulation of the nerves supplying the muscles. In group C, incremental border molding using modeling plastic impression compound was carried out. Participants in each group used the dentures for 3 months. After 3 months, OHIP-EDENT questionnaire responses were obtained from the participants to observe the oral health related quality of life. A dental specialist recorded denture quality by Kapur scoring criteria. After one month wash period, the treatment was swapped between the groups. OHIP-EDENT scores and Kapur score were recorded for the alternate dentures after 3 months of use. Descriptive analysis was followed by Mann Whitney test to compare the overall scores between group T and group C for OHIP-EDENT, the scores for individual domains of OHIP-EDENT, and Kapur score for denture evaluation (α = 0.05).

Results

The overall OHIP-EDENT scores within each domain were less in group T when compared with the scores in group C and Kapur score for group T was more than group C. The difference was statistically significant i.e. P = 0.002 & 0.003 respectively.

Conclusions

Less OHIP-EDENT scores in group T imply better perception of quality of life of individuals due to better performance of stomatognathic system. The higher Kapur scores in group T signifies better quality of dentures when TENS was used for definitive impression making.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物电印模和手工印模对全口义齿质量和生活质量的影响:交叉试验研究
目的比较使用经皮神经电刺激(TENS)辅助印模与手工印模进行全口义齿修复的参与者的全口义齿质量和生活质量。参与者被随机分为两组。每组 5 人,分别使用 TENS 促进确定印模技术(T 组)和传统印模技术(C 组)制作假牙。T 组采用生物电边界印模技术,通过电刺激供应肌肉的神经。在 C 组中,使用模型塑料印模材料进行增量边界成型。每组参与者使用假牙 3 个月。3 个月后,对参与者进行 OHIP-EDENT 问卷调查,以观察与口腔健康相关的生活质量。牙科专家根据卡普尔评分标准记录假牙质量。一个月的清洗期后,两组患者的治疗方法互换。使用 3 个月后,记录交替假牙的 OHIP-EDENT 评分和 Kapur 评分。对 T 组和 C 组的 OHIP-EDENT 总分、OHIP-EDENT 单个领域的分数以及义齿评估的 Kapur 分数(α = 0.05)进行描述性分析,然后进行曼-惠特尼检验。结论 T 组的 OHIP-EDENT 分数较低,这意味着由于口颌系统的性能更好,因此个人的生活质量感知也更好。T 组的 Kapur 评分较高,表明在使用 TENS 进行最终印模制作时,假牙的质量较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
167 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research (JOBCR)is the official journal of the Craniofacial Research Foundation (CRF). The journal aims to provide a common platform for both clinical and translational research and to promote interdisciplinary sciences in craniofacial region. JOBCR publishes content that includes diseases, injuries and defects in the head, neck, face, jaws and the hard and soft tissues of the mouth and jaws and face region; diagnosis and medical management of diseases specific to the orofacial tissues and of oral manifestations of systemic diseases; studies on identifying populations at risk of oral disease or in need of specific care, and comparing regional, environmental, social, and access similarities and differences in dental care between populations; diseases of the mouth and related structures like salivary glands, temporomandibular joints, facial muscles and perioral skin; biomedical engineering, tissue engineering and stem cells. The journal publishes reviews, commentaries, peer-reviewed original research articles, short communication, and case reports.
期刊最新文献
Long-term effects of orthognathic surgery on masticatory function in individuals with cleft lip and palate: A prospective study. Bibliometric analysis of 100 most cited papers on oral proliferative verrucous leukoplakia. Differential gene expression profile in Porphyromonas gingivalis treated human gingival keratinocytes and their role in the development of HNSCC. Evaluation of osteoblast response to polyacrylonitrile infused nano-curcumin coated on titanium discs: Invitro study cell culture experimental study. Dental implant placement accuracy with robotic surgery compared to free-hand, static and dynamic computer assisted techniques: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1