Asymmetric effects between economic development and fertility: What do 140 years of data tell us?

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Economic Asymmetries Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jeca.2024.e00368
Georgios Bampinas , Georgios Mavropoulos
{"title":"Asymmetric effects between economic development and fertility: What do 140 years of data tell us?","authors":"Georgios Bampinas ,&nbsp;Georgios Mavropoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2024.e00368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigates the historical nexus between economic development and fertility in eight highly advanced European economies between 1870 and 2014. We employ the method of moments quantile regression (MMQR), which enables us to examine the impact of the different levels of economic development on fertility. We also consider the role of mortality and marriage to gain a more comprehensive view of the relationship. Our results from the linear and panel quantile models suggest an inverse J-shaped pattern between economic development and fertility. However, the inverse J-shape vanishes when time effects are considered in the quantile regression model, while the impact of mortality and marriage on fertility is reinforced. To further elaborate our findings, we also employ a nonparametric panel estimation method with time-varying coefficients. Our results also suggest that periods characterized by a positive economic development effect on fertility rarely coincide with an upward movement in the observed fertility trajectory. We infer that economic development <em>per se</em> did not drive either the historical baby-boom period or the recent fertility rebound.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article e00368"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494924000173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the historical nexus between economic development and fertility in eight highly advanced European economies between 1870 and 2014. We employ the method of moments quantile regression (MMQR), which enables us to examine the impact of the different levels of economic development on fertility. We also consider the role of mortality and marriage to gain a more comprehensive view of the relationship. Our results from the linear and panel quantile models suggest an inverse J-shaped pattern between economic development and fertility. However, the inverse J-shape vanishes when time effects are considered in the quantile regression model, while the impact of mortality and marriage on fertility is reinforced. To further elaborate our findings, we also employ a nonparametric panel estimation method with time-varying coefficients. Our results also suggest that periods characterized by a positive economic development effect on fertility rarely coincide with an upward movement in the observed fertility trajectory. We infer that economic development per se did not drive either the historical baby-boom period or the recent fertility rebound.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经济发展与生育率之间的不对称效应:140 年的数据告诉我们什么?
本研究调查了 1870 年至 2014 年间八个高度发达的欧洲经济体的经济发展与生育率之间的历史联系。我们采用矩量回归(MMQR)方法,研究不同经济发展水平对生育率的影响。我们还考虑了死亡率和婚姻的作用,以便更全面地了解两者之间的关系。线性模型和面板量值模型的结果表明,经济发展与生育率之间存在反 J 型模式。然而,当考虑到量化回归模型中的时间效应时,反 J 型就消失了,而死亡率和婚姻对生育率的影响得到了加强。为了进一步阐述我们的研究结果,我们还采用了一种非参数面板估计方法,其系数随时间变化。我们的研究结果还表明,经济发展对生育率产生积极影响的时期很少与观察到的生育率轨迹的上升同时出现。我们推断,经济发展本身既没有推动历史上的婴儿潮时期,也没有推动最近的生育率反弹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
From debt arithmetic to fiscal sustainability and fiscal rules: Taking stock and policy lessons Editorial Board Asymmetric distance and business cycles (ΑDBC): A new understanding of distance in international trade models through the example of Iran's trade corridors The asymmetric impact of leisure externalities on economic growth Investigating the asymmetric effects of financial development on trade performance in Africa: Can digitalization, transport services, and regulatory quality drive the vision 2063?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1