Principles for co-producing climate services: Practical insights from FRACTAL

IF 4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Climate Services Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100492
Alice McClure , Joseph Daron , Sukaina Bharwani , Richard Jones , Lena C. Grobusch , Jessica Kavonic , Tamara Janes , Mary Zhang , Erin Hill , Murisa Mzime
{"title":"Principles for co-producing climate services: Practical insights from FRACTAL","authors":"Alice McClure ,&nbsp;Joseph Daron ,&nbsp;Sukaina Bharwani ,&nbsp;Richard Jones ,&nbsp;Lena C. Grobusch ,&nbsp;Jessica Kavonic ,&nbsp;Tamara Janes ,&nbsp;Mary Zhang ,&nbsp;Erin Hill ,&nbsp;Murisa Mzime","doi":"10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Co-production is increasingly acknowledged as the preferred mode for producing climate services, especially in complex and information-limited decision contexts. This paper contributes knowledge on practices and processes that can enable effective climate services in such contexts, through sharing experiences from the Future Resilience for African CiTies And Lands (FRACTAL) project.</p><p>FRACTAL focused on informing actions to tackle climate-related issues in nine cities in six southern African countries over a six-year period and, in parallel, developing research findings and insights. Principles for effectively co-producing climate services were collaboratively identified by the project team, after which practical insights were detailed by analysing the body of evidence produced during FRACTAL using qualitative methods. This analysis helped to understand how principles were engendered, as well as associated challenges.</p><p>While many principles identified resonate with the growing body of relevant knowledge, practical insights from this study contribute to understanding ‘how’ principles can be engendered. Experiences emphasise the importance of engaging participants’ emotions, avoiding centring on climate information, using a “third space” to facilitate equitable engagements, directing resources towards having fun and learning actively, process-driven iteration, focusing on contemporary issues with which stakeholders can connect, introducing a pathways framing, and embedding researchers in decision-making contexts. This constitutes a more comprehensive set of principles than was previously available in the literature. Application of these principles and the transdisciplinary framing, which was core to FRACTAL, supports a shift away from a focus on ‘products’ to knowledge co-production ‘processes’ where collaborative learning is the defining characteristic of climate services.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51332,"journal":{"name":"Climate Services","volume":"34 ","pages":"Article 100492"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880724000475/pdfft?md5=ef9b4366afd9d984f618ffb1db78446a&pid=1-s2.0-S2405880724000475-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405880724000475","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Co-production is increasingly acknowledged as the preferred mode for producing climate services, especially in complex and information-limited decision contexts. This paper contributes knowledge on practices and processes that can enable effective climate services in such contexts, through sharing experiences from the Future Resilience for African CiTies And Lands (FRACTAL) project.

FRACTAL focused on informing actions to tackle climate-related issues in nine cities in six southern African countries over a six-year period and, in parallel, developing research findings and insights. Principles for effectively co-producing climate services were collaboratively identified by the project team, after which practical insights were detailed by analysing the body of evidence produced during FRACTAL using qualitative methods. This analysis helped to understand how principles were engendered, as well as associated challenges.

While many principles identified resonate with the growing body of relevant knowledge, practical insights from this study contribute to understanding ‘how’ principles can be engendered. Experiences emphasise the importance of engaging participants’ emotions, avoiding centring on climate information, using a “third space” to facilitate equitable engagements, directing resources towards having fun and learning actively, process-driven iteration, focusing on contemporary issues with which stakeholders can connect, introducing a pathways framing, and embedding researchers in decision-making contexts. This constitutes a more comprehensive set of principles than was previously available in the literature. Application of these principles and the transdisciplinary framing, which was core to FRACTAL, supports a shift away from a focus on ‘products’ to knowledge co-production ‘processes’ where collaborative learning is the defining characteristic of climate services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
共同提供气候服务的原则:来自 FRACTAL 的实用见解
共同生产日益被视为生产气候服务的首选模式,尤其是在复杂和信息有限的决策环境中。本文通过分享 "非洲城市和土地未来复原力"(FRACTAL)项目的经验,介绍了在这种情况下能够提供有效气候服务的实践和流程。"非洲城市和土地未来复原力 "项目的重点是在六年时间里为解决南部非洲六个国家九个城市与气候有关的问题提供行动信息,同时开发研究成果和见解。项目团队共同确定了有效共同提供气候服务的原则,随后通过使用定性方法分析 FRACTAL 项目期间产生的大量证据,详细阐述了实际见解。这项分析有助于了解原则是如何形成的,以及相关的挑战。虽然确定的许多原则与不断增长的相关知识产生了共鸣,但本研究的实际见解有助于了解 "如何 "形成原则。经验强调了以下方面的重要性:调动参与者的情绪;避免以气候信息为中心;利用 "第三空间 "促进公平参与;将资源用于寓教于乐和积极学习;以过程为导向的迭代;关注利益相关者可以联系到的当代问题;引入路径框架;以及将研究人员纳入决策环境。与以前的文献相比,这些原则更加全面。应用这些原则和作为 FRACTAL 核心的跨学科框架,有助于从关注 "产品 "转向知识共同生产的 "过程",其中协作学习是气候服务的决定性特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Climate Services
Climate Services Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: The journal Climate Services publishes research with a focus on science-based and user-specific climate information underpinning climate services, ultimately to assist society to adapt to climate change. Climate Services brings science and practice closer together. The journal addresses both researchers in the field of climate service research, and stakeholders and practitioners interested in or already applying climate services. It serves as a means of communication, dialogue and exchange between researchers and stakeholders. Climate services pioneers novel research areas that directly refer to how climate information can be applied in methodologies and tools for adaptation to climate change. It publishes best practice examples, case studies as well as theories, methods and data analysis with a clear connection to climate services. The focus of the published work is often multi-disciplinary, case-specific, tailored to specific sectors and strongly application-oriented. To offer a suitable outlet for such studies, Climate Services journal introduced a new section in the research article type. The research article contains a classical scientific part as well as a section with easily understandable practical implications for policy makers and practitioners. The journal''s focus is on the use and usability of climate information for adaptation purposes underpinning climate services.
期刊最新文献
Himawari-8 satellite detection of morning terrain fog in a subtropical region Unveiling the determinants of climate change adaptation among small Landholders: Insights from a Mountainous Region in Pakistan Developing and testing an evaluation framework for climate services for adaptation Observed climate trends and farmers’ adaptation strategies in Dendi District, West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia Rainfall forecasts, learning subsidies and conservation agriculture adoption: Experimental evidence from Zambia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1