How to enhance Atlantic Forest protection? Dealing with the shortcomings of successional stages classification

IF 4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pecon.2024.04.002
Angélica F. Resende , Felipe Rosafa Gavioli , Rafael B. Chaves , Jean Paul Metzger , Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto , Pedro R. Piffer , Pedro M. Krainovic , Matheus S. Fuza , Ricardo R. Rodrigues , Marcelo Pinho , Catherine T. Almeida , Danilo R.A. Almeida , Paulo G. Molin , Thiago S.F. Silva , Pedro H.S. Brancalion
{"title":"How to enhance Atlantic Forest protection? Dealing with the shortcomings of successional stages classification","authors":"Angélica F. Resende ,&nbsp;Felipe Rosafa Gavioli ,&nbsp;Rafael B. Chaves ,&nbsp;Jean Paul Metzger ,&nbsp;Luís Fernando Guedes Pinto ,&nbsp;Pedro R. Piffer ,&nbsp;Pedro M. Krainovic ,&nbsp;Matheus S. Fuza ,&nbsp;Ricardo R. Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Marcelo Pinho ,&nbsp;Catherine T. Almeida ,&nbsp;Danilo R.A. Almeida ,&nbsp;Paulo G. Molin ,&nbsp;Thiago S.F. Silva ,&nbsp;Pedro H.S. Brancalion","doi":"10.1016/j.pecon.2024.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Atlantic Forest is a global biodiversity hotspot and a significant provider of ecosystem services to 65% of the Brazilian population. Due to being highly threatened, it is protected by federal law 11,428/2006, which establishes forest use restrictions based on native vegetation successional stages in the Atlantic Forest, with more advanced stages receiving more protection. The classification parameters are established at the state level. However, the parameters employed to classify forest fragments in different successional stages are subjective and imprecise, negatively impacting environmental permitting and related offset policies. Here, we critically assessed the major limitations in applying the 11,428/2006 law and presented alternatives for establishing a more transparent, applicable, legally safe, and effective protocol for identifying the conservation value of forest fragments. We also highlight problems related to sampling, indicators, and methodologies and present guidelines for revising the parameters for applying the Atlantic Forest law and associated state-level resolutions. We suggest an inclusive two-step analysis based on vegetation structure, forest cover history, biodiversity, ecosystem services (social), and landscape indicators. By employing a more technological approach and transferring part of the assessment responsibility to the state-level environmental agencies instead of allowing self-declared reports by landowners, our proposal focuses on the potential for evaluating ecological integrity among different successional classes by forest types. As nearly 90% of the remaining Brazilian Atlantic Forest is located within private lands, improving this legal instrument is essential for protecting the vulnerable biodiversity of this unique and threatened biome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56034,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 101-111"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000221/pdfft?md5=752ad81a7db222170e1e76db117d3d26&pid=1-s2.0-S2530064424000221-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2530064424000221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Atlantic Forest is a global biodiversity hotspot and a significant provider of ecosystem services to 65% of the Brazilian population. Due to being highly threatened, it is protected by federal law 11,428/2006, which establishes forest use restrictions based on native vegetation successional stages in the Atlantic Forest, with more advanced stages receiving more protection. The classification parameters are established at the state level. However, the parameters employed to classify forest fragments in different successional stages are subjective and imprecise, negatively impacting environmental permitting and related offset policies. Here, we critically assessed the major limitations in applying the 11,428/2006 law and presented alternatives for establishing a more transparent, applicable, legally safe, and effective protocol for identifying the conservation value of forest fragments. We also highlight problems related to sampling, indicators, and methodologies and present guidelines for revising the parameters for applying the Atlantic Forest law and associated state-level resolutions. We suggest an inclusive two-step analysis based on vegetation structure, forest cover history, biodiversity, ecosystem services (social), and landscape indicators. By employing a more technological approach and transferring part of the assessment responsibility to the state-level environmental agencies instead of allowing self-declared reports by landowners, our proposal focuses on the potential for evaluating ecological integrity among different successional classes by forest types. As nearly 90% of the remaining Brazilian Atlantic Forest is located within private lands, improving this legal instrument is essential for protecting the vulnerable biodiversity of this unique and threatened biome.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何加强大西洋森林保护?解决演替阶段分类的缺陷
大西洋森林是全球生物多样性热点地区,也是为 65% 的巴西人口提供生态系统服务的重要场所。由于受到高度威胁,大西洋森林受到第 11428/2006 号联邦法的保护,该法根据大西洋森林的原生植被演替阶段规定了森林使用限制,更高级阶段受到更多保护。分类参数由州一级制定。然而,用于划分不同演替阶段森林片段的参数既主观又不精确,对环境许可和相关补偿政策产生了负面影响。在此,我们批判性地评估了 11428/2006 号法律在应用上的主要局限性,并提出了替代方案,以建立一个更加透明、适用、法律上安全且有效的协议来确定森林片段的保护价值。我们还强调了与取样、指标和方法有关的问题,并提出了修订大西洋森林法和相关州级决议应用参数的指导原则。我们建议根据植被结构、森林覆盖历史、生物多样性、生态系统服务(社会)和景观指标进行两步分析。通过采用更具技术性的方法,并将部分评估责任移交给州级环境机构,而不是允许土地所有者自行申报,我们的建议侧重于评估森林类型中不同演替等级的生态完整性的潜力。由于剩余的巴西大西洋森林有近 90% 位于私人土地上,因此改进这一法律工具对于保护这一独特且濒临灭绝的生物群落中脆弱的生物多样性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
46
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation (PECON) is a scientific journal devoted to improving theoretical and conceptual aspects of conservation science. It has the main purpose of communicating new research and advances to different actors of society, including researchers, conservationists, practitioners, and policymakers. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation publishes original papers on biodiversity conservation and restoration, on the main drivers affecting native ecosystems, and on nature’s benefits to people and human wellbeing. This scope includes studies on biodiversity patterns, the effects of habitat loss, fragmentation, biological invasion and climate change on biodiversity, conservation genetics, spatial conservation planning, ecosystem management, ecosystem services, sustainability and resilience of socio-ecological systems, conservation policy, among others.
期刊最新文献
Declining representation of imperiled Atlantic Forest birds in community-science datasets Climate influence on future suitability of high-altitude wetlands in two natural protected areas from the Central Andes of Argentina Is banning Persistent Organic Pollutants efficient? A quantitative and qualitative systematic review in bats Identifying priority conservation areas for the Andean Condor in Colombia Past references are insufficient for Latin American biodiversity conservation in the Anthropocene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1