Farmers’ preferences for adopting agroforestry in the Eastern Province of Rwanda: A choice experiment

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100592
Jean Bosco Nkurikiye , Valens Uwizeyimana , Kato Van Ruymbeke , Iris Vanermen , Bruno Verbist , Alfred R. Bizoza , Liesbet Vranken
{"title":"Farmers’ preferences for adopting agroforestry in the Eastern Province of Rwanda: A choice experiment","authors":"Jean Bosco Nkurikiye ,&nbsp;Valens Uwizeyimana ,&nbsp;Kato Van Ruymbeke ,&nbsp;Iris Vanermen ,&nbsp;Bruno Verbist ,&nbsp;Alfred R. Bizoza ,&nbsp;Liesbet Vranken","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agroforestry is recognized as an effective land restoration strategy in Rwanda. To effectively implement agroforestry practices, it is crucial to examine and address the preferences of farmers. However, there is limited knowledge concerning farmers’ preferences for different agroforestry characteristics and their level of willingness to engage in such systems. This paper examines farmers’ preferences for adopting agroforestry in the Eastern Province of Rwanda using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) conducted among 248 households. The analysis conducted at plot level included a total of eight attributes: number of fruit trees, number of non-fruit trees, root system and canopy, change in maize yield resulting from tree planting, extension assistance, additional labor, distance to the tree nursery, and the cost of tree seedlings. Results indicate that farmers are generally willing to adopt agroforestry practices. They prefer agroforestry systems that incorporate non-fruit and particularly fruit trees, trees with smaller canopies, agroforestry systems with potential to increase maize yields, and regular extension assistance. However, farmers dislike increases in the cost of tree seedlings. Furthermore, findings reveal two distinct latent classes of plots, encompassing 34.5 % (Class 1) and 65.5 % (Class 2) of the plots. Farmers in Class 1 possess plots that are farther away from their homesteads and are indifferent towards the number of trees to be planted but prefer trees that increase maize yields. Farmers in Class 2 exhibit a strong inclination towards planting a greater number of trees that increase maize yields and have a small canopy. The proximity to tree nurseries and the availability of low-cost tree seedlings contribute to the likelihood of tree planting in this class. This study recommends aligning agroforestry-related policies and interventions with the preferences and needs of the farmers, taking into account plot characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324000992/pdfft?md5=a18bce2840629efefa325c40249612dc&pid=1-s2.0-S2666719324000992-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666719324000992","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry is recognized as an effective land restoration strategy in Rwanda. To effectively implement agroforestry practices, it is crucial to examine and address the preferences of farmers. However, there is limited knowledge concerning farmers’ preferences for different agroforestry characteristics and their level of willingness to engage in such systems. This paper examines farmers’ preferences for adopting agroforestry in the Eastern Province of Rwanda using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) conducted among 248 households. The analysis conducted at plot level included a total of eight attributes: number of fruit trees, number of non-fruit trees, root system and canopy, change in maize yield resulting from tree planting, extension assistance, additional labor, distance to the tree nursery, and the cost of tree seedlings. Results indicate that farmers are generally willing to adopt agroforestry practices. They prefer agroforestry systems that incorporate non-fruit and particularly fruit trees, trees with smaller canopies, agroforestry systems with potential to increase maize yields, and regular extension assistance. However, farmers dislike increases in the cost of tree seedlings. Furthermore, findings reveal two distinct latent classes of plots, encompassing 34.5 % (Class 1) and 65.5 % (Class 2) of the plots. Farmers in Class 1 possess plots that are farther away from their homesteads and are indifferent towards the number of trees to be planted but prefer trees that increase maize yields. Farmers in Class 2 exhibit a strong inclination towards planting a greater number of trees that increase maize yields and have a small canopy. The proximity to tree nurseries and the availability of low-cost tree seedlings contribute to the likelihood of tree planting in this class. This study recommends aligning agroforestry-related policies and interventions with the preferences and needs of the farmers, taking into account plot characteristics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卢旺达东部省农民采用农林业的偏好:选择实验
在卢旺达,农林业被认为是一种有效的土地恢复战略。为有效实施农林业实践,研究和解决农民的偏好问题至关重要。然而,关于农民对不同农林业特征的偏好及其参与此类系统的意愿水平,我们的了解还很有限。本文通过对 248 户家庭进行离散选择实验 (DCE),研究了卢旺达东部省农民对采用农林业的偏好。在小区层面进行的分析共包括八个属性:果树数量、非果树数量、根系和树冠、植树带来的玉米产量变化、推广援助、额外劳动力、到苗圃的距离以及树苗成本。结果表明,农民普遍愿意采用农林业做法。他们更喜欢种植非果树(尤其是果树)、树冠较小的树木、有可能提高玉米产量的农林系统以及定期的推广援助。然而,农民不喜欢树苗成本的增加。此外,调查结果显示有两个不同的潜在地块类别,分别占 34.5%(类别 1)和 65.5%(类别 2)。第 1 类地块的农民所拥有的地块离自己的家园较远,他们对种植树木的数量无所谓,但更喜欢能提高玉米产量的树木。2 类地的农民则更倾向于种植更多的能提高玉米产量、树冠较小的树木。由于靠近苗圃,且可获得低成本树苗,因此该类农民更倾向于植树造林。本研究建议根据地块特征,调整农林业相关政策和干预措施,使其符合农民的偏好和需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Influence of wildfires severity on tree composition and structure in Aberdare Afromontane forest ranges, Kenya Elemental profile of Ipê species to support timber tracing in Amazon Rainforest Unraveling the mystery: Decoding seed characteristics and germination challenges in Terminalia chebula Retz The linkage between forests and household food security: Empirical evidence from Shinyanga Region, Tanzania West Virginia forest landowners’ preferences for forest carbon offset programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1