A brief history of sagebrush management in the Great Basin: From removal to reduction and beyond

Tyler Harris , Dustin D. Johnson , Rory C. O'Connor
{"title":"A brief history of sagebrush management in the Great Basin: From removal to reduction and beyond","authors":"Tyler Harris ,&nbsp;Dustin D. Johnson ,&nbsp;Rory C. O'Connor","doi":"10.1016/j.rala.2024.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>After years of overgrazing in the late 1800s and early 1900s with little to no management, range management efforts shifted to focus on eradication of sagebrush to promote forage production from World War II to the 1970s.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>From the 1970s to present the paradigm shifted to an emphasis on leaving sagebrush intact for the benefit of sagebrush-obligate wildlife.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>However, neither management paradigm has yielded an ideal outcome with approximately 30% of the Great Basin being identified as “poor condition shrubland,” with &gt;10% shrub cover and a high ratio of annual to perennial herbaceous cover.</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>A combination of new and old restoration methods is needed to restore degraded sagebrush communities to rejuvenate the declining perennial herbaceous understories and increase biotic resiliency of the shrub community.</p></span></li></ul></div>","PeriodicalId":101057,"journal":{"name":"Rangelands","volume":"46 3","pages":"Pages 63-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000087/pdfft?md5=a84d5b80ab932d6d01699c79ccb1fe16&pid=1-s2.0-S0190052824000087-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangelands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190052824000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • After years of overgrazing in the late 1800s and early 1900s with little to no management, range management efforts shifted to focus on eradication of sagebrush to promote forage production from World War II to the 1970s.

  • From the 1970s to present the paradigm shifted to an emphasis on leaving sagebrush intact for the benefit of sagebrush-obligate wildlife.

  • However, neither management paradigm has yielded an ideal outcome with approximately 30% of the Great Basin being identified as “poor condition shrubland,” with >10% shrub cover and a high ratio of annual to perennial herbaceous cover.

  • A combination of new and old restoration methods is needed to restore degraded sagebrush communities to rejuvenate the declining perennial herbaceous understories and increase biotic resiliency of the shrub community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大盆地灌木丛管理简史:从清除到减少及其后
-在 19 世纪末和 20 世纪初的多年过度放牧之后,牧场管理几乎没有进行任何管理,从第二次世界大战到 20 世纪 70 年代,牧场管理的重点转向根除灌木丛,以促进饲料生产。-然而,这两种管理模式都没有产生理想的结果,大盆地约有 30% 的地区被认定为 "灌木地状况不佳",灌木覆盖率为 10%,一年生草本植物与多年生草本植物的覆盖率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Rangeland management practices in Somaliland: lessons learned from the Aroori Grazing Reserve Rates of change in invasive annual grass cover to inform management actions in sagebrush ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1