Does Lack of Initial Collar-Calcar Contact Influence Performance of Collared Cementless Femoral Stems?

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Today Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2024.101432
Travis R. Weiner BS , Catelyn A. Woelfle BA , Winnie Xu BA , Duke G. Yim MD , Roshan P. Shah MD , H. John Cooper MD
{"title":"Does Lack of Initial Collar-Calcar Contact Influence Performance of Collared Cementless Femoral Stems?","authors":"Travis R. Weiner BS ,&nbsp;Catelyn A. Woelfle BA ,&nbsp;Winnie Xu BA ,&nbsp;Duke G. Yim MD ,&nbsp;Roshan P. Shah MD ,&nbsp;H. John Cooper MD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Initial stability of cementless stems is important to minimize the risk of subsidence, pain, and periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Collared stems improve initial component stability when contacting the femoral calcar. Direct contact is not always achieved, and collared stem performance has not been studied in this context. We hypothesized that collared stems achieving direct contact would demonstrate reduced subsidence.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A single-surgeon retrospective study of 482 consecutive primary THAs implanted between February 2020 and May 2023 using collared cementless stems was performed. The 2 cohorts included stems with initial collar-calcar contact vs stems without. Subsidence was evaluated by comparing intraoperative fluoroscopy to postoperative 8-week radiographs. Binary logistic regression identified independent risk factors for subsidence. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables and <em>t</em>-tests for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of stems, 63.9% achieved initial collar-calcar contact, while 36.1% did not. The rate (1.3% vs 19.0%; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and magnitude (0.02 mm, range 0-3 mm vs 0.35 mm, range 0-3 mm; <em>P</em> &lt; .001) of subsidence were significantly higher among stems without initial contact. Stems without initial collar-calcar contact (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and male gender (<em>P</em> = .007) were independent risk factors for subsidence. Two patients with initial contact had nondisplaced calcar cracks and &lt;3 mm of subsidence at 4 weeks, which healed with protected weight-bearing. Stem survivorship was 100% in both groups, with all achieving osteointegration and none needing revision.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Excellent performance of collared cementless stems was observed at 8 weeks after primary THA. Initial collar-calcar contact lowered the risk and magnitude of minor subsidence but did not affect survivorship or fracture risk.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001171/pdfft?md5=35edc129e0b5a2822b85845f4a7fdd9e&pid=1-s2.0-S2352344124001171-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344124001171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Initial stability of cementless stems is important to minimize the risk of subsidence, pain, and periprosthetic fracture after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Collared stems improve initial component stability when contacting the femoral calcar. Direct contact is not always achieved, and collared stem performance has not been studied in this context. We hypothesized that collared stems achieving direct contact would demonstrate reduced subsidence.

Methods

A single-surgeon retrospective study of 482 consecutive primary THAs implanted between February 2020 and May 2023 using collared cementless stems was performed. The 2 cohorts included stems with initial collar-calcar contact vs stems without. Subsidence was evaluated by comparing intraoperative fluoroscopy to postoperative 8-week radiographs. Binary logistic regression identified independent risk factors for subsidence. Chi-square tests were used for categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables.

Results

Of stems, 63.9% achieved initial collar-calcar contact, while 36.1% did not. The rate (1.3% vs 19.0%; P < .001) and magnitude (0.02 mm, range 0-3 mm vs 0.35 mm, range 0-3 mm; P < .001) of subsidence were significantly higher among stems without initial contact. Stems without initial collar-calcar contact (P < .001) and male gender (P = .007) were independent risk factors for subsidence. Two patients with initial contact had nondisplaced calcar cracks and <3 mm of subsidence at 4 weeks, which healed with protected weight-bearing. Stem survivorship was 100% in both groups, with all achieving osteointegration and none needing revision.

Conclusions

Excellent performance of collared cementless stems was observed at 8 weeks after primary THA. Initial collar-calcar contact lowered the risk and magnitude of minor subsidence but did not affect survivorship or fracture risk.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有髋臼-无髋臼接触不良是否会影响有髋臼无骨水泥股骨柄的性能?
背景无骨水泥柄的初始稳定性对于最大限度地降低全髋关节置换术(THA)后出现下沉、疼痛和假体周围骨折的风险非常重要。有领骨干在接触股骨髁时可提高组件的初始稳定性。直接接触并不总是能实现的,在这种情况下,尚未对有领骨干的性能进行研究。我们假设实现直接接触的有袢骨干会减少下沉。方法对2020年2月至2023年5月期间使用无骨水泥有袢骨干植入的482例连续初次THA进行了单外科医师回顾性研究。2个队列包括有颈圈-卡环初始接触的基台和无颈圈-卡环接触的基台。通过比较术中透视和术后8周X光片对下沉进行评估。二元逻辑回归确定了下沉的独立风险因素。对分类变量采用卡方检验,对连续变量采用t检验。没有初次接触的茎干的下沉率(1.3% vs 19.0%; P <.001)和下沉幅度(0.02 mm,范围 0-3 mm vs 0.35 mm,范围 0-3 mm; P <.001)明显更高。没有颈圈-卡环初次接触的骨干(P <.001)和男性性别(P = .007)是导致下沉的独立危险因素。两名有初次接触的患者在4周时出现了非移位的钙痕裂缝和<3毫米的下陷,在保护性负重下愈合。两组患者的柄存活率均为100%,所有患者都实现了骨整合,无一需要翻修。最初的基台-卡环接触降低了轻微下沉的风险和程度,但并不影响存活率或骨折风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Three-Dimensional Planning Using Computed Tomography Improves Screw Placement in Patients Undergoing Acetabular Revision Surgery Correlation of Acetabular Cup Placement Angles Between an Artificial Intelligence-Powered System Using a Smartphone and Human Measurements Ninety-Day Outcomes in Primary Hypercoagulable Disease Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty Vs Normal: A Matched Case-Control Series The Impact of Spinopelvic and Hip Mobility on Passive Hip Flexion Range of Motion Assessment The Effect of Periprosthetic Fractures Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty on Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1