Arthroplasty Today最新文献

Background

Perioperative complications of deep vein thrombosis are well described in the total joint arthroplasty (TJA) literature. Few studies have investigated short-term perioperative outcomes of patients with primary hypercoagulable diseases (PHDs). Optimal perioperative management of PHD patients remains unknown, and they are often referred to tertiary centers for care. We investigated the influence perioperative hematology consultation and anti-coagulation use had on PHD patient outcomes following TJA surgery within the 90-day postoperative period.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study examined perioperative outcomes of PHD patients undergoing TJA. Thirty-eight PHD patients were identified and compared to a 3:1 matched control group in a consecutive series of 6568 cases (2007-2019). Perioperative hematology consultations, use of anticoagulants (AC) or antiplatelet therapy, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and complications within 90 days of surgery were determined.

Results

The PHD cohort exhibited more frequent hematology consultations (odds ratio 5.88, 95% confidence interval: 2.59-16.63) and AC use (odds ratio 7.9, 95% confidence interval: 3.38-23.80) than controls. PHD patients did not show significantly greater rates of deep vein thrombosis, transfusion, infection, ED visits, or need for operative intervention. Similarly, AC vs antiplatelet therapy yielded comparable ED visits and readmissions within 90 days postoperatively (11.0% vs 9.7%, P = .85 and 5.5% vs 5.5%, P = 1, respectively).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that despite increased hematology consultation and AC use, PHD patients do not demonstrate significantly elevated perioperative risks post-TJA, favoring careful preoperative workup and outpatient postoperative follow-up.

Background

Stable fixation of joint replacement implants is essential to achieve osseointegration in uncemented implants. In acetabular revisions, screws often need to be utilized in quadrants other than the historically so-called “safe” zones to attain sufficient stability. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative three-dimensional (3D) planning for acetabular revision surgery influences screw length, specifically in the superior pubic ramus (SPR).

Methods

Between March 2017 and December 2021, 20 patients underwent preoperative two-dimensional (2D) planning (2D group), and 30 patients underwent 3D planning following the implementation of a new 3D planning software into clinical practice in September 2019 (3D group). Two observers, blinded to the groups, measured the total screw length, screw penetration depth, and cup position on available postoperative computed tomography examinations. For statistical comparisons, the mean measurement from the 2 observers was used.

Results

The median total screw lengths in the SPR were 16 mm in the 2D group and 25 mm in the 3D group (P = .004) and 40.5 mm compared with 50.5 mm in the ilium (P = .019). Median screw penetration depths in the SPR were 0 mm in the 2D group and 1.25 mm in the 3D group (P = .049).

Conclusion

Longer screws were used in the SPR and ilium when preoperative 3D planning was conducted. Due to the study design, we were not able to evaluate whether longer screws lead to better fixation. Further studies are needed to elucidate this question.

Background

An automated measurement system for the placement angles of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty prostheses was developed utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms. The AI-powered system enables immediate measurement by capturing an anteroposterior pelvic X-ray through a smartphone camera.

Methods

While developing the AI-powered measurement system, we trained AI utilizing 100 labeled anteroposterior pelvic X-rays to recognize the hip joint and 483 labeled anteroposterior pelvic X-rays to identify anatomical landmarks and the acetabular cup. To validate the AI-powered system, we measured the acetabular cup placement angles of 126 unlabeled post-total hip arthroplasty anteroposterior pelvic X-rays with both the AI-powered system and conventional measurement methods and assessed the correlation between the 2 methods.

Results

The Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the acetabular cup placement angles measured using the AI-powered system and conventional method were 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-0.92, P < .001) in inclination angle and 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.83, P < .001) in anteversion angle, respectively.

Conclusions

Both inclination and anteversion angles measured using the AI-powered system showed a strong correlation with angles obtained through conventional methods.

Background

Measuring passive hip flexion range of motion (ROM) is challenging due to compensatory movements. Despite the interest in using functional lateral radiographs for assessing hip mobility, the relationship with passive hip flexion ROM remains unclear. This study aims to elucidate this relationship and clarify spinopelvic parameters and mobility factors influencing variations in passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on 154 preoperative patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty. Passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM were assessed to clarify these relationships, and these differences were classified into 3 groups (O, A and U). Spinopelvic and hip parameters were assessed in standing, relaxed-seated and flexed-seated positions, as well as lumbar, pelvis, and hip mobility between each position to identify factors influencing differences.

Results

There was a moderate correlation between passive and radiographic hip flexion ROM (R² = 0.48, P < .01). A significant difference was found in pelvic and hip alignment in the flexed-seated position between all groups. In postural changes, the O group, which had more patients with relatively low hip mobility, showed greater lumbar spine and pelvic movement, while the U group, which had more patients with relatively high hip mobility, showed less lumbar spine and pelvic movement.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that passive hip flexion ROM and radiographic hip flexion ROM correlate and that spinopelvic and hip alignment and mobility influence these differences. This result suggests that clinicians should consider lumbar and pelvic alignment and mobility in clinical practice to improve the accuracy of passive hip flexion ROM measurements.

Background

Periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) have increased in the past decade as the demand for primary surgery continues to grow. Although there is now more evidence to describe the treatment of Vancouver B fractures, there is still limited knowledge regarding factors that cause surgeons to perform either an open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) or revision THA (rTHA). The purpose of this study was to determine what type of surgeons treat Vancouver B PPFFs at 11 major academic institutions and if there are trends in treatment decision-making regarding the use of ORIF or rTHA based on surgical training or patient factors.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients surgically treated for Vancouver B PPFF after THA between 2014 and 2019. Patients from 11 academic centers located in the United States were included in this study. Surgical outcomes and patient demographics were evaluated based on surgeon training, surgical treatment type, and institution.

Results

Presence of Vancouver B2 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.02, P < .001) or B3 (OR: 0.04, P < .001) fractures were independent risk factors for treatment with rTHA. Treatment by a trauma (OR: 12.49, P < .001) or other-specified surgeon (OR: 13.63, P < .001) were independent risk factors for ORIF repair of Vancouver B fractures. There were no differences in outcomes based on surgeon subspecialty training.

Conclusions

This study showed the trends in surgeons who surgically manage Vancouver B fractures at 11 major academic institutions and highlighted that regardless of surgical training or surgical treatment type, postoperative outcomes following management of PPFF were similar.

Background

Periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) can be devastating, yet their long-term impact has not been well described. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcomes of patients who sustained a PPF about a TJA with those of patients who underwent an uncomplicated TJA.

Methods

Patients who sustained a PPF after primary TJA between 2005 and 2014 were identified. Seventeen patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up (PPF cohort) were compared to a matched cohort of 67 patients who underwent uncomplicated TJA. Demographic data, comorbidities, surgical details, and complications were analyzed. Quality of life and functional outcomes were assessed with 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), Western Ontario and McMasdter Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Society Function Score.

Results

The overall complication rate was 41.2% in the PPF group, including 3 additional fractures (17.6%), 2 wound infections (11.8%), one prosthetic joint infection (5.8%), and one painful patellar hardware necessitating removal (5.8%). At 2 years, both physical and mental components of the SF-12 were significantly lower for the PPF cohort vs control (SF-12-P, 28.7 ± 4.4 vs 40.8 ± 10.3, P < .001, SF-12-M, 36.7 ± 5.07 vs 55.0 ± 8.19, P < .0001). WOMAC pain and function scores were also significantly worse in the PPF cohort vs control at 2 years (WOMAC-pain, 38.8 ± 29.9 vs 87.4 ± 22.1; P < .0001, WOMAC-function, 40.7 ± 8.7 vs 76.1 ± 20.3; P < .0001). At 2 years, score improvements from prearthroplasty baseline were significantly greater in the control cohort vs PPF for SF-12-physical, WOMAC-pain, and WOMAC-function.

Conclusions

Patients who sustained PPFs following TJA have poor long-term outcomes despite appropriate treatment. These results can help counsel patients and encourage heightened efforts to minimize the risk of PPF.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

Effective communication is vital for patient safety, yet failures are common, often due to outdated methods. This study aimed to assess whether in-ear communication devices improve communication in orthopedic surgery simulations compared to traditional loud voice methods. Fifteen participants underwent simulations using both in-ear wireless devices and standard communication. Results showed significant improvements with in-ear devices in correctly identifying phrases (78.6% vs 44%), effectiveness (7.9/10 vs 4.9/10), and clarity (8/10 vs 4/10), all P < .001. Participants also favored in-ear devices in usability assessments. Sound levels recorded were comparable between groups. In conclusion, in-ear communication is safe and effective in orthopedic settings, potentially enhancing efficiency and safety. These devices can mitigate loud noises, benefiting surgeon well-being and patient outcomes.

Background

There is a paucity of validated risk stratification tools to assess which patients can safely and predictably undergo outpatient total hip (THA) or knee arthroplasty (TKA) in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC).

Methods

Our novel patient selection tool was prospectively applied to 190 consecutive primary THA and TKA performed by a single surgeon at a single ASC. We identified the proportion of patients discharged home the same day, those requiring a one-night stay, or those with failed discharge within 23 hours. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine if any demographic parameters were risk factors for an overnight stay.

Results

Overall, 190 (100%) patients selected for outpatient THA and TKA were discharged home within 23 hours. One hundred and four patients (55%) were discharged the same day of surgery, whereas 86 (45%) required overnight stay and were discharged on postoperative day 1. Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0-8.2, P < .001), THA (OR: 2.5, 95% CI: 1.1-5.5, P = .022), and heavier body mass index (OR: 1.0, 95% CI: 1.0-1.2, P = .022) were identified as independent risk factors for staying overnight in the ASC.

Conclusions

In this pilot study, we found that 100% of outpatient THA and TKA-eligible patients were able to be discharged home by postoperative day 1. Additionally, we found that this selection tool is safe and effective at predicting short-stay discharge in an ASC.

Background

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the gold standard for treating chronic hip periprosthetic joint infections. However, controversy remains regarding the optimal spacer type, particularly among patients with increased dislocation risk. This study reports on the outcomes of articulating hip spacers utilizing a single constrained-liner design.

Methods

All patients who underwent treatment for hip periprosthetic joint infection at a single institution were screened. Patients were included if they received an articulating spacer utilizing a constrained liner of a single manufacturer design. Indications for constrained liner, demographic variables, and surgical variables were recorded. Patients were assessed for dislocation and component loosening prior to the second stage or at the final follow-up if the second stage was not undertaken. Comparative analysis was performed.

Results

Overall, 26 constrained liners were utilized in 25 patients. Indications for constrained liner included history of dislocation (n = 14), massive proximal femoral bone loss (n = 14), greater trochanteric deficiency (n = 12), and absent abductors (n = 7). Many patients had more than one indication. In total, 9 hips (34.6%) underwent a second stage at an average of 7.4 months, while 17 hips never underwent a second stage with an average follow-up of 27.6 months. One patient experienced failure of their constrained liner prior to the second stage due to pelvic discontinuity and massive acetabular bone loss.

Conclusions

Utilization of a constrained liner as an articulating spacer is a viable option for patients at high risk of instability. Meticulous cement technique, appropriate component position, and implant selection are crucial in achieving successful outcomes.

Background

Patients with genetic skeletal dysplasias often require lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) due to early joint degeneration; however, little data exists regarding the outcomes of TJA in this population. Our purpose was to review the literature to determine the complication rates, revision rates, implant survivorship, and patient-reported outcomes of total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in those with genetic skeletal dysplasias.

Methods

A systematic literature review of online databases (PubMed and Google Scholar) was conducted. Studies that reported the outcomes of THA or total knee arthroplasty in patients with genetically confirmed skeletal dysplasias were included. Case reports and studies that defined dysplasia based on height alone were excluded. Fourteen studies met the criteria for data extraction and analysis.

Results

Our review yielded a sample of 596 skeletal dysplasia patients with a median follow-up of 6.01 years (1.7-15.9). Mean age was 54.04 years, and mean body mass index was 29.1 kg/m². Cementless fixation was utilized in 65.7% of THAs, while all knees were cemented. Hip implant survivorship was 79% at 10 years and 56% at 20 years. Knee implant survivorship was 92% at 10 years and 46% at 20 years. Hip and knee revisions were 15.3% and 13.5%, respectively. The most common indication was aseptic loosening and polyethylene wear. Patient-reported outcomes improved across all domains.

Conclusions

The literature regarding lower extremity TJA in those with genetic skeletal dysplasias demonstrates appropriate 10-year implant survivorship and improvement in patient-reported outcomes across all survey domains.