Navigating diverse commercial fisher perspectives for effective knowledge exchange in fisheries research and management

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103798
Rob Hoschke , Natasha Pauli , Tim Langlois , Andrew T. Knight , Harriet Davies , Matt Navarro
{"title":"Navigating diverse commercial fisher perspectives for effective knowledge exchange in fisheries research and management","authors":"Rob Hoschke ,&nbsp;Natasha Pauli ,&nbsp;Tim Langlois ,&nbsp;Andrew T. Knight ,&nbsp;Harriet Davies ,&nbsp;Matt Navarro","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Local Ecological Knowledge held by commercial fishers is a valuable but underutilized resource for advancing scientific understanding in fisheries and marine management. To better incorporate this knowledge into management agencies and research departments, a thorough understanding of knowledge exchange between fishers and research scientists is essential. While previous studies have reported successful knowledge exchange, often based on consensus statements or gauged by tangible management outcomes, few have critically explored fishers’ engagement experiences, preferences, and the factors influencing these. To address this gap, we employed an inductive research methodology and conducted semi-structured interviews with twenty-one commercial fishers from two contrasting Western Australian commercial fisheries targeting different species with different gear types. Six key engagement themes were identified, revealing diverse attitudes held by fishers toward knowledge exchange with fisheries research scientists. We found that a minority of fishers from each fishery were highly engaged, acting as knowledge brokers, whereas the remaining fishers were disinterested or had minimal opportunities to engage researchers. We also found higher levels of engagement and a wider variety of interactions in the more valuable (and well-resourced) fishery. Key barriers to knowledge exchange included the use of technical scientific language and approaches alienating some fishers, limited research budgets, and fishers' reservations about sharing their expertize. We discuss strategies to overcome these barriers, including tailored engagement models, training research scientists in communicating with individuals from non-academic backgrounds, increasing funding to support industry partnerships in low-value fisheries, and broadening the focus of fisher engagement beyond the realms of fisheries science.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001321/pdfft?md5=2c4b77d5d9712d18212d5df161032325&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001321-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001321","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Local Ecological Knowledge held by commercial fishers is a valuable but underutilized resource for advancing scientific understanding in fisheries and marine management. To better incorporate this knowledge into management agencies and research departments, a thorough understanding of knowledge exchange between fishers and research scientists is essential. While previous studies have reported successful knowledge exchange, often based on consensus statements or gauged by tangible management outcomes, few have critically explored fishers’ engagement experiences, preferences, and the factors influencing these. To address this gap, we employed an inductive research methodology and conducted semi-structured interviews with twenty-one commercial fishers from two contrasting Western Australian commercial fisheries targeting different species with different gear types. Six key engagement themes were identified, revealing diverse attitudes held by fishers toward knowledge exchange with fisheries research scientists. We found that a minority of fishers from each fishery were highly engaged, acting as knowledge brokers, whereas the remaining fishers were disinterested or had minimal opportunities to engage researchers. We also found higher levels of engagement and a wider variety of interactions in the more valuable (and well-resourced) fishery. Key barriers to knowledge exchange included the use of technical scientific language and approaches alienating some fishers, limited research budgets, and fishers' reservations about sharing their expertize. We discuss strategies to overcome these barriers, including tailored engagement models, training research scientists in communicating with individuals from non-academic backgrounds, increasing funding to support industry partnerships in low-value fisheries, and broadening the focus of fisher engagement beyond the realms of fisheries science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
引导商业渔民的不同观点,促进渔业研究和管理中的有效知识交流
商业渔民掌握的当地生态知识是促进渔业和海洋管理科学理解的宝贵资源,但却未得到充分利用。为了更好地将这些知识纳入管理机构和研究部门,全面了解渔民和研究科学家之间的知识交流至关重要。尽管之前的研究报告了成功的知识交流,通常是基于共识声明或以有形的管理成果来衡量,但很少有研究对渔民的参与经验、偏好和影响因素进行批判性探讨。为了填补这一空白,我们采用了归纳式研究方法,对来自西澳大利亚州两个对比鲜明的商业渔场的 21 名商业渔民进行了半结构化访谈,这些渔民使用不同类型的渔具捕捞不同的鱼种。我们确定了六个关键参与主题,揭示了渔民对与渔业研究科学家进行知识交流的不同态度。我们发现,每个渔场都有少数渔民高度参与,充当知识经纪人,而其余渔民则对研究人员不感兴趣或参与机会极少。我们还发现,在更有价值(和资源充足)的渔场,参与程度更高,互动种类更多。知识交流的主要障碍包括使用技术性科学语言和方法疏远了一些渔民、研究预算有限以及渔民对分享他们的专业知识持保留态度。我们讨论了克服这些障碍的战略,包括量身定制的参与模式、培训研究科学家与非学术背景的个人交流、增加资金支持低价值渔业中的行业伙伴关系,以及将渔民参与的重点扩大到渔业科学领域之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Attending to the unattended: Why and how do local governments plan for access and functional needs in climate risk reduction? Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research Of heroes and villains – How coalitions shape their narratives and what the public conservation debate is actually about? Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1