Environmental Science & Policy最新文献

Constructing a routine accountability mechanism: Reflections on the air pollution control effect of public attention-triggered environmental accountability 构建常态化问责机制：公众关注环境问责对大气污染治理效果的思考

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104324

Jindan Liu , Peiming He , Xiaogang Wu , Junxiao Fei , Litai Chen

As China's industrialization progresses and public environmental awareness grows, air pollution has become a widely concerned topic among the public. To address the public opinion crisis, timely and effective environmental accountability has emerged as the primary solution. This study collects news reports of environmental accountability caused by “air quality deterioration” crises since the public gained access to real-time air quality index (AQI) data online. Using a regression discontinuity design (RDD) method, the study examines the effectiveness of public attention-triggered environmental accountability in improving air quality. The study found that environmental accountability can effectively reverse public opinion crises, significantly improve air quality and that this improvement effect lasts for approximately 90 days. Further analysis revealed that the impact of public attention-triggered environmental accountability on air pollution is influenced by public sentiment. For pollutants such as PM_2.5 and PM₁₀, which are perceptible to the public, and in severely polluted regions, the more severe the public's negative sentiment, the more pronounced the governance effects of environmental accountability. Additionally, public attention leading to environmental accountability at different hierarchies produces significant differences. Due to the local management characteristics of environmental governance, provincial governments, with their information advantages, can hold accountable more promptly and accurately compared to the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, resulting in better governance. Furthermore, public attention leading to environmental accountability yields more significant governance in cities with higher population densities and more transparent environmental information. Interestingly, public attention-triggered environmental accountability also has a “warning effect” on surrounding regions, prompting them to actively improve air pollution and avoid penalties. The findings of this study provide valuable references for improving air pollution and enhancing China's and global environmental governance performance through the improvement of public supervision channels and the establishment of effective accountability mechanisms.

随着中国工业化进程的推进和公众环保意识的增强，大气污染已成为公众广泛关注的话题。应对舆论危机，及时有效的环境问责已成为首要出路。本研究收集了公众在线获取实时空气质量指数（AQI）数据以来，因“空气质量恶化”危机引发的环境问责的新闻报道。采用回归不连续设计（RDD）方法，研究了公众关注引发的环境问责制在改善空气质量方面的有效性。研究发现，环境问责能有效扭转舆论危机，显著改善空气质量，改善效果持续约90天。进一步分析发现，公众关注引发的环境问责对大气污染的影响受公众情绪的影响。对于PM2.5、PM10等公众可感知的污染物，在污染严重的地区，公众负面情绪越严重，环境问责的治理效果越明显。此外，不同层次的公众关注导致环境问责产生显著差异。由于环境治理的地方管理特点，省级政府具有信息优势，与生态环境部相比，可以更及时、更准确地问责，从而实现更好的治理。此外，在人口密度更高、环境信息更透明的城市，公众关注导致的环境问责产生的治理效果更显著。有趣的是，公众关注引发的环境问责也对周边地区产生了“警示效应”，促使他们积极改善空气污染，避免受到处罚。本研究结果为通过完善公众监督渠道和建立有效的问责机制来改善大气污染，提高中国和全球环境治理绩效提供了有价值的参考。

{"title":"Constructing a routine accountability mechanism: Reflections on the air pollution control effect of public attention-triggered environmental accountability","authors":"Jindan Liu , Peiming He , Xiaogang Wu , Junxiao Fei , Litai Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104324","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104324","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As China's industrialization progresses and public environmental awareness grows, air pollution has become a widely concerned topic among the public. To address the public opinion crisis, timely and effective environmental accountability has emerged as the primary solution. This study collects news reports of environmental accountability caused by “air quality deterioration” crises since the public gained access to real-time air quality index (AQI) data online. Using a regression discontinuity design (RDD) method, the study examines the effectiveness of public attention-triggered environmental accountability in improving air quality. The study found that environmental accountability can effectively reverse public opinion crises, significantly improve air quality and that this improvement effect lasts for approximately 90 days. Further analysis revealed that the impact of public attention-triggered environmental accountability on air pollution is influenced by public sentiment. For pollutants such as PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, which are perceptible to the public, and in severely polluted regions, the more severe the public's negative sentiment, the more pronounced the governance effects of environmental accountability. Additionally, public attention leading to environmental accountability at different hierarchies produces significant differences. Due to the local management characteristics of environmental governance, provincial governments, with their information advantages, can hold accountable more promptly and accurately compared to the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, resulting in better governance. Furthermore, public attention leading to environmental accountability yields more significant governance in cities with higher population densities and more transparent environmental information. Interestingly, public attention-triggered environmental accountability also has a “warning effect” on surrounding regions, prompting them to actively improve air pollution and avoid penalties. The findings of this study provide valuable references for improving air pollution and enhancing China's and global environmental governance performance through the improvement of public supervision channels and the establishment of effective accountability mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104324"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146073812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Why carbon offsets may fail in complex systems: A causal inference perspective 为什么碳补偿在复杂系统中可能失败：因果推理视角

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104325

Pushpendra Rana , Forrest Fleischman , Amit Sharma

Social-ecological system dynamics present a fundamental challenge to the attribution of changes in carbon stocks to actions taken by carbon offset sellers. We illustrate this challenge by demonstrating theoretical limitations to causal attribution in two cases from Brazil and India. We show that carbon outcomes in these nature-based carbon offset projects emerge from non-linear and independent dynamics that are the result of the inherent complexity of social-ecological systems, where large numbers of variables jointly influence causal processes. This creates high levels of uncertainty about the causes of outcomes, and thus makes it very difficult to attribute changes in carbon storage to specific causes, such as offset-funded programs. Furthermore, the predominant solution to this problem suggested in the literature, improved causal inference methods, fails to address the challenge because these methods are designed to estimate average effects across many cases, not to measure causality in specific cases. Even well-designed and resourced projects, such as our two cases, must demonstrate their own measurable impact to serve as offsets, and our analysis suggests that current methods are unable to overcome the joint challenges of causal complexity and methods that estimate average, not individual effects. The need for offsets to demonstrate individual causality makes them quite different from analogous conservation tools such as Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES), highlighting why project-based offsetting consistently struggles to meet the expectations of credibility. To achieve effective climate change mitigation, policymakers need to focus on policies that do not depend on inherently uncertain causal attribution.

社会生态系统动力学对将碳储量的变化归因于碳抵消销售者的行为提出了根本性的挑战。我们通过在巴西和印度的两个案例中展示因果归因的理论局限性来说明这一挑战。我们表明，这些基于自然的碳抵消项目中的碳结果来自非线性和独立的动态，这是社会生态系统固有复杂性的结果，其中大量变量共同影响因果过程。这造成了对结果原因的高度不确定性，因此很难将碳储量的变化归因于具体原因，例如抵消资助的项目。此外，文献中提出的主要解决方案，改进的因果推理方法，未能解决这一挑战，因为这些方法旨在估计许多情况下的平均效果，而不是衡量特定情况下的因果关系。即使是设计良好、资源充足的项目，比如我们的两个案例，也必须证明它们自己的可衡量的影响作为补偿，我们的分析表明，当前的方法无法克服因果复杂性和估计平均而非个别影响的方法的共同挑战。对证明个体因果关系的补偿的需求使它们与类似的保护工具（如生态系统服务付费（PES））有很大不同，这突出了为什么基于项目的补偿一直难以满足可信度的期望。为了实现有效的气候变化缓解，决策者需要把重点放在不依赖于内在不确定的因果归因的政策上。

{"title":"Why carbon offsets may fail in complex systems: A causal inference perspective","authors":"Pushpendra Rana , Forrest Fleischman , Amit Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104325","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104325","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social-ecological system dynamics present a fundamental challenge to the attribution of changes in carbon stocks to actions taken by carbon offset sellers. We illustrate this challenge by demonstrating theoretical limitations to causal attribution in two cases from Brazil and India. We show that carbon outcomes in these nature-based carbon offset projects emerge from non-linear and independent dynamics that are the result of the inherent complexity of social-ecological systems, where large numbers of variables jointly influence causal processes. This creates high levels of uncertainty about the causes of outcomes, and thus makes it very difficult to attribute changes in carbon storage to specific causes, such as offset-funded programs. Furthermore, the predominant solution to this problem suggested in the literature, improved causal inference methods, fails to address the challenge because these methods are designed to estimate average effects across many cases, not to measure causality in specific cases. Even well-designed and resourced projects, such as our two cases, must demonstrate their own measurable impact to serve as offsets, and our analysis suggests that current methods are unable to overcome the joint challenges of causal complexity and methods that estimate average, not individual effects. The need for offsets to demonstrate individual causality makes them quite different from analogous conservation tools such as Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES), highlighting why project-based offsetting consistently struggles to meet the expectations of credibility. To achieve effective climate change mitigation, policymakers need to focus on policies that do not depend on inherently uncertain causal attribution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104325"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146073810","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Conditional visibility: Intersectional inequities marginalize local scholarship in conservation science 条件可见性：交叉不平等使保护科学的地方学术边缘化

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-02-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104328

Ronald J. Maliao , Béla Tóthmérész

Structural inequities in conservation science, rooted in center-periphery dynamics, funding asymmetries, and systemic gender disparities, marginalize Global South scholarship. This marginalization impedes the integration of Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK), effectively decoupling local scholarship from global conservation discourse. We analyzed 132 peer-reviewed articles on Philippine aquatic ILK and environmental stewardship. We modeled how author affiliation (International/Local), gender (Male/Female), and funding status (Funded/Unfunded) shaped scholarly visibility using scientometric mapping and factorial analysis. Our findings revealed a clear thematic segregation: international scholars focused on the highly visible Applied Conservation cluster (median Citations Per Year [CPY] = 2.06), but Philippine scholars concentrated on the less visible Ethnoecology and Governance cluster (median CPY = 0.80). Globally, our modeling reveals a significant three-way interaction (Analysis of Variance [ANOVA], F(1124) = 12.06, p < 0.001). Pairwise comparison confirmed an intersectional pattern: funded Philippine male scholars achieved statistical parity with international peers, yet funded Philippine female scholars remained significantly marginalized. This demographic hierarchy was absent in the Philippines-only subset (F(3,72) = 0.92, p > 0.05). These findings highlight conditional visibility: the impact of local scholarship is shaped not by merit alone but by intersectional hierarchies of affiliation, funding, and gender. Achieving global knowledge equity demands dismantling these hierarchies to end the erasure of local, and particularly female, scholarship in conservation science.

保护科学中的结构性不平等，源于中心-边缘动态、资金不对称和系统性性别差异，使全球南方奖学金边缘化。这种边缘化阻碍了土著和地方知识（ILK）的整合，有效地将地方学术与全球保护话语脱钩。我们分析了132篇关于菲律宾水生ILK和环境管理的同行评议文章。我们使用科学计量图和析因分析对作者隶属关系（国际/本地）、性别（男性/女性）和资助状况（资助/未资助）如何影响学术知名度进行了建模。我们的研究结果揭示了明显的主题隔离：国际学者关注的是高度可见的应用保护集群（年引用中位数[CPY] = 2.06），而菲律宾学者关注的是不太可见的民族生态学和治理集群（中位数CPY = 0.80）。在全球范围内，我们的模型揭示了显著的三方相互作用（方差分析[ANOVA]， F(1124) = 12.06,p <； 0.001）。两两比较证实了交叉模式：获得资助的菲律宾男性学者在统计上与国际同行持平，而获得资助的菲律宾女性学者仍然明显被边缘化。这种人口结构在仅菲律宾子集中不存在（F(3,72) = 0.92,p > 0.05）。这些发现强调了有条件的可见性：地方奖学金的影响不仅取决于成绩，还取决于隶属关系、资助和性别的交叉等级。要实现全球知识公平，就需要拆除这些等级制度，以结束对当地，尤其是女性，保护科学学术的抹去。

{"title":"Conditional visibility: Intersectional inequities marginalize local scholarship in conservation science","authors":"Ronald J. Maliao , Béla Tóthmérész","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104328","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104328","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Structural inequities in conservation science, rooted in center-periphery dynamics, funding asymmetries, and systemic gender disparities, marginalize Global South scholarship. This marginalization impedes the integration of Indigenous and Local Knowledge (ILK), effectively decoupling local scholarship from global conservation discourse. We analyzed 132 peer-reviewed articles on Philippine aquatic ILK and environmental stewardship. We modeled how author affiliation (International/Local), gender (Male/Female), and funding status (Funded/Unfunded) shaped scholarly visibility using scientometric mapping and factorial analysis. Our findings revealed a clear thematic segregation: international scholars focused on the highly visible Applied Conservation cluster (median Citations Per Year [CPY] = 2.06), but Philippine scholars concentrated on the less visible Ethnoecology and Governance cluster (median CPY = 0.80). Globally, our modeling reveals a significant three-way interaction (Analysis of Variance [ANOVA], <em>F</em>(1124) = 12.06, <em>p</em> < 0.001). Pairwise comparison confirmed an intersectional pattern: funded Philippine male scholars achieved statistical parity with international peers, yet funded Philippine female scholars remained significantly marginalized. This demographic hierarchy was absent in the Philippines-only subset (<em>F</em>(3,72) = 0.92, <em>p</em> > 0.05). These findings highlight <em>conditional visibility</em>: the impact of local scholarship is shaped not by merit alone but by intersectional hierarchies of affiliation, funding, and gender. Achieving global knowledge equity demands dismantling these hierarchies to end the erasure of local, and particularly female, scholarship in conservation science.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104328"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146073811","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Sustainability transition frameworks: Integrating space, scale, nature, power, and justice 可持续转型框架：整合空间、规模、自然、权力和正义

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104327

Chloé Nicolas-Artero , Jampel Dell'Angelo

This paper advances scholarship in sustainability transition studies (STS), a field concerned with understanding how sociotechnical systems evolve in response to pressing sustainability challenges. It presents a systematic and comparative assessment of eight major analytical frameworks commonly employed within STS, with the aim of uncovering their theoretical foundations, shared commonalities, and key points of divergence. To deepen this evaluation, the paper integrates insights from critical geography and political ecology, foregrounding the socio-spatial and political dimensions of transition processes. Particular attention is paid to how concepts such as space, scale, nature, power, and justice are incorporated—or overlooked—within existing frameworks. The findings reveal significant variation in how these dimensions are theorised and operationalised, highlighting a persistent gap in the treatment of spatial justice. The paper argues that engaging more explicitly with socio-spatial inequalities and power relations can enhance both the analytical robustness and practical relevance of sustainability transition research.

本文推进了可持续性转型研究（STS）的学术研究，这是一个关注理解社会技术系统如何在应对紧迫的可持续性挑战时演变的领域。本文对STS中常用的八种主要分析框架进行了系统的比较评估，旨在揭示它们的理论基础、共同之处和分歧的关键点。为了深化这一评价，本文整合了批判地理学和政治生态学的见解，突出了转型过程的社会空间和政治维度。特别关注诸如空间、规模、自然、权力和正义等概念如何在现有框架中被纳入或忽视。研究结果揭示了这些维度在如何理论化和操作化方面的显著差异，突出了空间正义处理方面的持续差距。本文认为，更明确地参与社会空间不平等和权力关系可以提高可持续性转型研究的分析稳健性和实际相关性。

{"title":"Sustainability transition frameworks: Integrating space, scale, nature, power, and justice","authors":"Chloé Nicolas-Artero , Jampel Dell'Angelo","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104327","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104327","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper advances scholarship in sustainability transition studies (STS), a field concerned with understanding how sociotechnical systems evolve in response to pressing sustainability challenges. It presents a systematic and comparative assessment of eight major analytical frameworks commonly employed within STS, with the aim of uncovering their theoretical foundations, shared commonalities, and key points of divergence. To deepen this evaluation, the paper integrates insights from critical geography and political ecology, foregrounding the socio-spatial and political dimensions of transition processes. Particular attention is paid to how concepts such as space, scale, nature, power, and justice are incorporated—or overlooked—within existing frameworks. The findings reveal significant variation in how these dimensions are theorised and operationalised, highlighting a persistent gap in the treatment of spatial justice. The paper argues that engaging more explicitly with socio-spatial inequalities and power relations can enhance both the analytical robustness and practical relevance of sustainability transition research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104327"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Rethinking governance for the Global Biodiversity Framework: Legal gaps and lessons from Chile 重新思考全球生物多样性框架的治理：智利的法律空白和经验教训

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-30 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104313

María José Martínez-Harms , Jessica Castillo-Mandujano , Bárbara Saavedra , Cecilia Smith-Ramírez , Bárbara Larraín-Barrios , Patricio Pliscoff , Álvaro G. Gutiérrez , Micaela Poutay-Broussaingaray , Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda , Aníbal Pauchard , Olga Barbosa , Eduardo Fuentes-Lillo , Álvaro Salazar , Matías Moreno-Faguett , José Salgado-Rojas

The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) calls for transformative governance to halt biodiversity loss and promote equitable, effective conservation. Yet implementation remains challenging in countries with fragmented and unequal governance systems. This Perspective introduces a place-based conceptual framework to assess and improve biodiversity governance under the GBF, integrating governance typologies, structural principles (e.g., polycentricity, resilience), and normative dimensions of good governance (e.g., legitimacy, inclusion, equity). We apply this framework to Chile, a country marked by jurisdictional fragmentation and uneven recognition of diverse governance models. Through a documentary analysis of 15 legal instruments, we examine their alignment with GBF Targets 1, 2, 3, and 22 and assess how good governance principles are formally reflected in national legal frameworks. Our findings reveal partial alignment with structural principles, stronger recognition of legitimacy and effectiveness, and persistent weaknesses in equity and accountability. The proposed framework offers a transferable perspective for identifying regulatory and institutional gaps, allowing for guidance on necessary reforms in the design of more adaptive, plural, and evidence-based conservation strategies. By revealing how legal design can enable or constrain progress, the framework supports institutional learning and highlights the need to promote the integration of community and indigenous governance into national planning. While developed through the Chilean case, the framework may inform similar efforts in other postcolonial settings. The effective implementation of the GBF requires reimagining governance, and design-based legal evaluation is crucial for diagnosing institutional architectures and highlighting where reforms are needed to achieve that dynamic and inclusive process, rooted in both legal mandates and diverse knowledge systems.

《昆明-蒙特利尔全球生物多样性框架》呼吁通过变革性治理来阻止生物多样性丧失，促进公平、有效的保护。然而，在治理体系支离破碎和不平等的国家，实施工作仍然具有挑战性。本视角介绍了一个基于地方的概念框架，以评估和改善GBF下的生物多样性治理，整合治理类型、结构原则（如多中心性、复原力）和良好治理的规范维度（如合法性、包容性、公平性）。我们将这一框架应用于智利，这个国家的特点是管辖权分散，对不同治理模式的认识不平衡。通过对15项法律文书的文献分析，我们检查了它们与GBF目标1、2、3和22的一致性，并评估了善治原则如何正式反映在国家法律框架中。我们的研究结果揭示了与结构原则的部分一致性，对合法性和有效性的更强认识，以及在公平和问责制方面的持续弱点。拟议的框架为确定监管和制度差距提供了一个可转移的视角，为设计更具适应性、多元化和基于证据的保护战略的必要改革提供了指导。通过揭示法律设计如何能够促进或制约进步，该框架支持机构学习，并强调了促进将社区和土著治理纳入国家规划的必要性。虽然该框架是通过智利的案例发展起来的，但它可以为其他后殖民背景下的类似努力提供参考。有效实施GBF需要对治理进行重新构想，而基于设计的法律评估对于诊断机构架构和突出需要改革的领域至关重要，以实现基于法律授权和多样化知识体系的动态和包容性进程。

{"title":"Rethinking governance for the Global Biodiversity Framework: Legal gaps and lessons from Chile","authors":"María José Martínez-Harms , Jessica Castillo-Mandujano , Bárbara Saavedra , Cecilia Smith-Ramírez , Bárbara Larraín-Barrios , Patricio Pliscoff , Álvaro G. Gutiérrez , Micaela Poutay-Broussaingaray , Eduardo Álvarez-Miranda , Aníbal Pauchard , Olga Barbosa , Eduardo Fuentes-Lillo , Álvaro Salazar , Matías Moreno-Faguett , José Salgado-Rojas","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104313","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104313","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) calls for transformative governance to halt biodiversity loss and promote equitable, effective conservation. Yet implementation remains challenging in countries with fragmented and unequal governance systems. This Perspective introduces a place-based conceptual framework to assess and improve biodiversity governance under the GBF, integrating governance typologies, structural principles (e.g., polycentricity, resilience), and normative dimensions of good governance (e.g., legitimacy, inclusion, equity). We apply this framework to Chile, a country marked by jurisdictional fragmentation and uneven recognition of diverse governance models. Through a documentary analysis of 15 legal instruments, we examine their alignment with GBF Targets 1, 2, 3, and 22 and assess how good governance principles are formally reflected in national legal frameworks. Our findings reveal partial alignment with structural principles, stronger recognition of legitimacy and effectiveness, and persistent weaknesses in equity and accountability. The proposed framework offers a transferable perspective for identifying regulatory and institutional gaps, allowing for guidance on necessary reforms in the design of more adaptive, plural, and evidence-based conservation strategies. By revealing how legal design can enable or constrain progress, the framework supports institutional learning and highlights the need to promote the integration of community and indigenous governance into national planning. While developed through the Chilean case, the framework may inform similar efforts in other postcolonial settings. The effective implementation of the GBF requires reimagining governance, and design-based legal evaluation is crucial for diagnosing institutional architectures and highlighting where reforms are needed to achieve that dynamic and inclusive process, rooted in both legal mandates and diverse knowledge systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104313"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076856","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Integrating more-than-human approaches in urban planning pedagogy: A case study from Europe 在城市规划教学中整合超越人类的方法：来自欧洲的案例研究

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321

Susa Eräranta , Adrianna Czarnecka , Monika Piotrkowska , Jonne Hytönen

Despite decades of sustainability efforts, urban planning often leads to environmental degradation. This paper questions the anthropocentric assumptions in planning education and advocates for integrating nonhuman perspectives through a more-than-human approach. To embrace the intrinsic value and agency of all actors, the paper approaches more-than-human planning education through three stages: recognition, inclusion, and co-flourishing. As traditional planning curricula prioritize human needs, overlooking the interconnectedness of all life, the paper provides already existing examples of more-than-human planning education by reflecting on the experiences of students and course staff on two Master's level studio courses at Warsaw University of Technology (Poland) and Aalto University (Finland) to learn from the potential of more-than-human education. These courses aimed to strengthen planners' roles in sustainability transformations by recognizing the agency and intrinsic value of nonhumans. The findings suggest that the core aim of planning from a more-than-human perspective is in protecting the planet’s life-supporting systems – not only in protecting individual humans, plants, or animals. This requires a shift from individually focused thinking towards more holistic systemic approaches. Based on this, the paper initiates a discussion on the need for a paradigm shift in planning education to embrace more-than-human perspectives.

尽管几十年的可持续发展努力，城市规划往往导致环境退化。本文质疑规划教育中的人类中心假设，并主张通过超越人类的方法整合非人类的观点。为了拥抱所有参与者的内在价值和能动性，本文通过三个阶段来探讨超越人类的规划教育：承认、包容和共同繁荣。由于传统的规划课程优先考虑人的需求，忽视了所有生活的相互联系，本文通过反思华沙理工大学（波兰）和阿尔托大学（芬兰）的两门硕士水平工作室课程的学生和课程人员的经验，提供了已经存在的超越人类的规划教育的例子，以了解超越人类教育的潜力。这些课程旨在通过认识非人类的能动性和内在价值，加强规划师在可持续性转型中的作用。研究结果表明，从超越人类的角度进行规划的核心目标是保护地球的生命支持系统，而不仅仅是保护个体人类、植物或动物。这需要从个人关注的思维转向更全面的系统方法。在此基础上，本文提出了规划教育范式转变的必要性，以拥抱超越人类的视角。

{"title":"Integrating more-than-human approaches in urban planning pedagogy: A case study from Europe","authors":"Susa Eräranta , Adrianna Czarnecka , Monika Piotrkowska , Jonne Hytönen","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104321","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite decades of sustainability efforts, urban planning often leads to environmental degradation. This paper questions the anthropocentric assumptions in planning education and advocates for integrating nonhuman perspectives through a more-than-human approach. To embrace the intrinsic value and agency of all actors, the paper approaches more-than-human planning education through three stages: recognition, inclusion, and co-flourishing. As traditional planning curricula prioritize human needs, overlooking the interconnectedness of all life, the paper provides already existing examples of more-than-human planning education by reflecting on the experiences of students and course staff on two Master's level studio courses at Warsaw University of Technology (Poland) and Aalto University (Finland) to learn from the potential of more-than-human education. These courses aimed to strengthen planners' roles in sustainability transformations by recognizing the agency and intrinsic value of nonhumans. The findings suggest that the core aim of planning from a more-than-human perspective is in protecting the planet’s life-supporting systems – not only in protecting individual humans, plants, or animals. This requires a shift from individually focused thinking towards more holistic systemic approaches. Based on this, the paper initiates a discussion on the need for a paradigm shift in planning education to embrace more-than-human perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104321"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023778","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Transdisciplinarity in water management: A systematic review of concepts, practices, and challenges 水管理的跨学科性：对概念、实践和挑战的系统回顾

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104317

Ana Paula de Carvalho Silva , Margarida Ribau Teixeira , Luís Miguel Nunes

Transdisciplinarity has become a central paradigm for addressing complex socio-environmental challenges that transcend disciplinary and institutional boundaries. This article revisits the concept from the perspective of water resources management, questioning whether its increasing application has achieved the depth and transformative potential originally envisioned. A systematic review and bibliometric analysis were conducted to examine how transdisciplinarity has been conceptualized and operationalized across 61 international initiatives covering multiple governance scales and institutional contexts. The findings reveal that, although transdisciplinarity is now widely recognized in scientific and policy agendas, its implementation often remains rhetorical or fragmented. Persistent barriers include limited knowledge co-production, asymmetry between scientific and local expertise, and weak participatory mechanisms. Nonetheless, promising experiences demonstrate that when communities are engaged as co-authors of decisions, water governance becomes more legitimate, adaptive, and sustainable. By integrating empirical evidence with conceptual reflection, this study advances understanding of how ethical and methodological co-production can move transdisciplinarity from a normative paradigm toward an actionable framework for water governance.

跨学科已经成为解决超越学科和制度界限的复杂社会环境挑战的核心范式。本文从水资源管理的角度重新审视了这一概念，质疑其日益增加的应用是否达到了最初设想的深度和变革潜力。通过系统回顾和文献计量分析，研究了涵盖多种治理尺度和制度背景的61项国际倡议如何概念化和运作跨学科性。研究结果表明，尽管跨学科现在在科学和政策议程中得到广泛认可，但其实施往往仍然是口头上的或支离破碎的。持续存在的障碍包括有限的知识合作生产、科学和地方专业知识之间的不对称以及薄弱的参与机制。尽管如此，有希望的经验表明，当社区作为决策的共同作者参与时，水治理变得更加合法、适应性和可持续性。通过将经验证据与概念反思相结合，本研究促进了对伦理和方法合作生产如何将跨学科从规范范式转向可操作的水治理框架的理解。

{"title":"Transdisciplinarity in water management: A systematic review of concepts, practices, and challenges","authors":"Ana Paula de Carvalho Silva , Margarida Ribau Teixeira , Luís Miguel Nunes","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104317","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104317","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transdisciplinarity has become a central paradigm for addressing complex socio-environmental challenges that transcend disciplinary and institutional boundaries. This article revisits the concept from the perspective of water resources management, questioning whether its increasing application has achieved the depth and transformative potential originally envisioned. A systematic review and bibliometric analysis were conducted to examine how transdisciplinarity has been conceptualized and operationalized across 61 international initiatives covering multiple governance scales and institutional contexts. The findings reveal that, although transdisciplinarity is now widely recognized in scientific and policy agendas, its implementation often remains rhetorical or fragmented. Persistent barriers include limited knowledge co-production, asymmetry between scientific and local expertise, and weak participatory mechanisms. Nonetheless, promising experiences demonstrate that when communities are engaged as co-authors of decisions, water governance becomes more legitimate, adaptive, and sustainable. By integrating empirical evidence with conceptual reflection, this study advances understanding of how ethical and methodological co-production can move transdisciplinarity from a normative paradigm toward an actionable framework for water governance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104317"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023777","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Indigenous well-being indicators and social impact assessment: Redefining restoration success for Klamath River dam removal 土著居民福祉指标和社会影响评估：重新定义克拉马斯河大坝拆除的恢复成功

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104276

Sibyl Diver , John R. Oberholzer Dent , Daniel Sarna-Wojcicki , Nathaniel Ramos , Ron Reed

This study considers how applying a well-being framework and assessment codesign with Karuk Tribal partners create new possibilities for including Indigenous knowledge systems in social and environmental assessment. Responding to the lack of inclusion of Indigenous peoples in policy-making, we developed well-being indicators with Tribal partners as one approach to bringing Indigenous knowledge systems into social assessment. Working with the Karuk Tribe in the Klamath Basin (California, Oregon, US), our Tribal-academic research team conducted a baseline social impact assessment for Tribal community well-being for a large-scale dam removal project. Data collection occurred in the six months leading up to decommissioning and after two decades of Tribally-led advocacy, science, and policy initiatives supporting Klamath River dam removal. Co-developed with the Karuk Tribe, well-being indicators reflect the longstanding, culturally specific relationships held between Karuk people and the Klamath watershed that are predicted to change with dam removal. These indicators focus on access to cultural resources, holistic health, education, livelihoods, and self-governance. Following assessment codesign, Tribal and academic researchers applied a two-eyed seeing approach to conduct focus groups and a survey reaching a diverse cross-section of the Karuk community, including Tribal youth. Baseline assessment findings provide more culturally-grounded, holistic and inclusive measures for evaluating the social impacts of Klamath dam removal, where Tribal community well-being is understood as an indicator of restoration success.

本研究考虑了如何与Karuk部落合作伙伴应用福祉框架和评估协同设计，为将土著知识系统纳入社会和环境评估创造新的可能性。针对土著人民缺乏参与决策的情况，我们与部落伙伴一起制定了福祉指标，作为将土著知识系统纳入社会评估的一种方法。我们的部落学术研究小组与克拉马斯盆地（美国加利福尼亚州、俄勒冈州）的卡鲁克部落合作，为一个大规模的大坝拆除项目对部落社区的福祉进行了基线社会影响评估。数据收集是在克拉马斯河大坝退役前的六个月内进行的，也是在部落领导的倡导、科学和政策倡议支持克拉马斯河大坝拆除20年后进行的。与卡鲁克部落共同开发的幸福指标反映了卡鲁克人与克拉马斯流域之间长期存在的特定文化关系，这种关系预计将随着大坝的拆除而改变。这些指标侧重于获取文化资源、整体健康、教育、生计和自治。在评估共同设计之后，部落和学术研究人员采用双眼观察的方法进行焦点小组和调查，涉及Karuk社区的不同横截面，包括部落青年。基线评估结果为评估克拉马斯大坝拆除的社会影响提供了更具文化基础、整体和包容性的措施，在那里，部落社区的福祉被理解为恢复成功的一个指标。

{"title":"Indigenous well-being indicators and social impact assessment: Redefining restoration success for Klamath River dam removal","authors":"Sibyl Diver , John R. Oberholzer Dent , Daniel Sarna-Wojcicki , Nathaniel Ramos , Ron Reed","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104276","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104276","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study considers how applying a well-being framework and assessment codesign with Karuk Tribal partners create new possibilities for including Indigenous knowledge systems in social and environmental assessment. Responding to the lack of inclusion of Indigenous peoples in policy-making, we developed well-being indicators with Tribal partners as one approach to bringing Indigenous knowledge systems into social assessment. Working with the Karuk Tribe in the Klamath Basin (California, Oregon, US), our Tribal-academic research team conducted a baseline social impact assessment for Tribal community well-being for a large-scale dam removal project. Data collection occurred in the six months leading up to decommissioning and after two decades of Tribally-led advocacy, science, and policy initiatives supporting Klamath River dam removal. Co-developed with the Karuk Tribe, well-being indicators reflect the longstanding, culturally specific relationships held between Karuk people and the Klamath watershed that are predicted to change with dam removal. These indicators focus on access to cultural resources, holistic health, education, livelihoods, and self-governance. Following assessment codesign, Tribal and academic researchers applied a two-eyed seeing approach to conduct focus groups and a survey reaching a diverse cross-section of the Karuk community, including Tribal youth. Baseline assessment findings provide more culturally-grounded, holistic and inclusive measures for evaluating the social impacts of Klamath dam removal, where Tribal community well-being is understood as an indicator of restoration success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104276"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146024238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Reimagining alternative socioecological futures: Transformative narratives for a Second Scientific Revolution 重新想象可选择的社会生态未来：第二次科学革命的变革叙事

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104319

Eduardo Rodríguez Batista

The Anthropocene has become a dominant framework for describing the current human-driven geological epoch. However, this concept is often rooted in dualistic worldviews that separate humans from nature. This article examines the colonial, capitalist, and mechanistic discourses that have sustained these divisions, linking them to the origins and persistence of the socioecological crisis. It advocates for a shift toward decolonial and non-anthropocentric perspectives that reimagine human–nature relationships. Central to this reorientation is the power of transformative narratives to challenge dominant scientific myths and promote interspecies mutualism and interconnectedness. Drawing on insights from disciplines such as evolutionary biology, political ecology and ecofeminism, among others, this work underscores the importance of these narratives in shaping collective action and imagining alternative socioecological futures. It ultimately calls for a Second Scientific Revolution, a cultural and scientific paradigm transformation towards more inclusive, empathetic, and sustainable ways of inhabiting the Earth.

人类世已经成为描述当前人类驱动的地质时代的主要框架。然而，这种观念往往植根于将人类与自然分开的二元论世界观。本文考察了维持这些分裂的殖民主义、资本主义和机械论话语，并将它们与社会生态危机的起源和持续联系起来。它提倡向非殖民主义和非人类中心主义的观点转变，重新设想人与自然的关系。这种重新定位的核心是变革性叙事的力量，它挑战了占主导地位的科学神话，促进了物种间的互惠互利和相互联系。借鉴进化生物学、政治生态学和生态女性主义等学科的见解，这项工作强调了这些叙事在塑造集体行动和想象替代社会生态未来方面的重要性。它最终呼吁进行第二次科学革命，这是一场文化和科学范式的转变，朝着更包容、更有同情心和更可持续的方式居住在地球上。

{"title":"Reimagining alternative socioecological futures: Transformative narratives for a Second Scientific Revolution","authors":"Eduardo Rodríguez Batista","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104319","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104319","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Anthropocene has become a dominant framework for describing the current human-driven geological epoch. However, this concept is often rooted in dualistic worldviews that separate humans from nature. This article examines the colonial, capitalist, and mechanistic discourses that have sustained these divisions, linking them to the origins and persistence of the socioecological crisis. It advocates for a shift toward decolonial and non-anthropocentric perspectives that reimagine human–nature relationships. Central to this reorientation is the power of transformative narratives to challenge dominant scientific myths and promote interspecies mutualism and interconnectedness. Drawing on insights from disciplines such as evolutionary biology, political ecology and ecofeminism, among others, this work underscores the importance of these narratives in shaping collective action and imagining alternative socioecological futures. It ultimately calls for a Second Scientific Revolution, a cultural and scientific paradigm transformation towards more inclusive, empathetic, and sustainable ways of inhabiting the Earth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104319"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Governing the trade-off between the co-production of actionable knowledge and academic publishing in transdisciplinary sustainability research 管理跨学科可持续性研究中可操作知识的共同生产与学术出版之间的权衡

IF 5.2 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Environmental Science & Policy

Pub Date : 2026-01-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104318

Tom Dedeurwaerdere , Stephanie Jahn , Jens Newig

Despite their stated ambitions, the societal outputs of many transdisciplinary sustainability research projects remain at the level of research dissemination to policy makers and concerned stakeholders, rather than organizing a truly interactive knowledge co-production process. In addition, projects that organize interactive knowledge co-production often achieve either a high level of actionable knowledge outputs for the key societal stakeholders or a high level of publication outputs for the scientific community. This paper analyses this trade-off in more detail based on the survey results from a unique sample of 50 completed EU research projects that fall under the same funding requirement to combine societal impact and scientific excellence in so-called "Research and Innovation Actions". The results confirm the difficulty for many projects to achieve both goals. In fact, the results show that only about half (54 %) of the projects produced actionable knowledge outputs at the end of the project, and only 34 % achieved both a high level of actionable knowledge outputs and a high level of peer-reviewed articles. The analysis of the survey results shows that co-design of research tasks related to field work, such as social science data collection or technical experimentation in real-world environments, contributes to actionable knowledge, but also potentially leads to fewer publications. An important exception to this finding is the case of intermediate levels of field research co-design. In this case, the strengthening of relational and reflective-normative trust between scientific researchers and social actors contributes to both actionable knowledge outputs and academic publications.

尽管有明确的目标，但许多跨学科可持续发展研究项目的社会产出仍然停留在向决策者和有关利益相关者传播研究成果的水平，而不是组织一个真正互动的知识共同生产过程。此外，组织互动式知识合作生产的项目通常要么为关键的社会利益相关者实现高水平的可操作知识产出，要么为科学界实现高水平的出版物产出。本文基于对50个已完成的欧盟研究项目的独特样本的调查结果，更详细地分析了这种权衡，这些研究项目属于相同的资助要求，以将所谓的“研究与创新行动”中的社会影响和科学卓越结合起来。结果证实了许多项目实现这两个目标的难度。事实上，结果表明，只有大约一半（54 %）的项目在项目结束时产生了可操作的知识输出，只有34 %的项目既获得了高水平的可操作知识输出，又获得了高水平的同行评审文章。对调查结果的分析表明，与实地工作相关的研究任务的共同设计，如社会科学数据收集或现实环境中的技术实验，有助于获得可操作的知识，但也可能导致出版物减少。这一发现的一个重要例外是中间水平的实地研究协同设计的情况。在这种情况下，加强科学研究人员和社会行为者之间的关系和反思规范信任有助于可操作的知识产出和学术出版物。

{"title":"Governing the trade-off between the co-production of actionable knowledge and academic publishing in transdisciplinary sustainability research","authors":"Tom Dedeurwaerdere , Stephanie Jahn , Jens Newig","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104318","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104318","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite their stated ambitions, the societal outputs of many transdisciplinary sustainability research projects remain at the level of research dissemination to policy makers and concerned stakeholders, rather than organizing a truly interactive knowledge co-production process. In addition, projects that organize interactive knowledge co-production often achieve either a high level of actionable knowledge outputs for the key societal stakeholders or a high level of publication outputs for the scientific community. This paper analyses this trade-off in more detail based on the survey results from a unique sample of 50 completed EU research projects that fall under the same funding requirement to combine societal impact and scientific excellence in so-called \"Research and Innovation Actions\". The results confirm the difficulty for many projects to achieve both goals. In fact, the results show that only about half (54 %) of the projects produced actionable knowledge outputs at the end of the project, and only 34 % achieved both a high level of actionable knowledge outputs and a high level of peer-reviewed articles. The analysis of the survey results shows that co-design of research tasks related to field work, such as social science data collection or technical experimentation in real-world environments, contributes to actionable knowledge, but also potentially leads to fewer publications. An important exception to this finding is the case of intermediate levels of field research co-design. In this case, the strengthening of relational and reflective-normative trust between scientific researchers and social actors contributes to both actionable knowledge outputs and academic publications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 104318"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146023779","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0