Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction among young adults without traditional cardiovascular risk factors in the United States

IF 1.3 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100408
Garba Rimamskep Shamaki , Israel Safiriyu , Akanimo Antia , Waddah K. Abd El-Radi , Chiwoneso Beverley Tinago , Onyedika Ilonze
{"title":"Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction among young adults without traditional cardiovascular risk factors in the United States","authors":"Garba Rimamskep Shamaki ,&nbsp;Israel Safiriyu ,&nbsp;Akanimo Antia ,&nbsp;Waddah K. Abd El-Radi ,&nbsp;Chiwoneso Beverley Tinago ,&nbsp;Onyedika Ilonze","doi":"10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors (SMuRF) such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking have long been established in the etiology of atherosclerotic disease. Studies suggest that patients without any of these risk factors (SMuRF-less) who present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction have worse outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The National Inpatient Sample databases (2016 to 2020) was queried to identify STEMI admissions as a principal diagnosis using ICD 10 codes. The study population aged 18 to 45 years were divided into cohorts of SMuRF and SMuRF-less based on the presence of ≥1 risk factor (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking), and in-hospital outcomes were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>41,990 patients were identified as the final study population. 38,495 patients were identified as SMuRF, and 3495 patients were SMuRF-less. Compared to SMuRF patients, SMuRF-less patients are more likely to be females (23.2 % vs. 21.2 %), have congestive heart failure (16.6 % vs. 13.7 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) but less likely to have obesity (13.7 % vs 28.0 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) In evaluating outcomes, SMuRF-less patients had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.6, CI 1.5–4.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), Cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.8, CI 1.3–2.5, p &lt; 0.01), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.4, CI 1.0–1.9, <em>p</em> = 0.02), and Extramembrane Corporeal Oxygenation (aOR 4.1, CI 1.1–15.1, <em>p</em> = 0.03). Fluid and electrolyte abnormalities was an independent predictor of mortality among SMuRF-less patients (aOR 3.82, CI 1.3–11.2, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Young patients who present with STEMI and have no traditional cardiovascular risk factors have worse in-hospital outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of non-traditional risk factors on acute myocardial infarction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72158,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400051X/pdfft?md5=779abcc2da21ae74c3c0b7309ab29d22&pid=1-s2.0-S266660222400051X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266660222400051X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors (SMuRF) such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking have long been established in the etiology of atherosclerotic disease. Studies suggest that patients without any of these risk factors (SMuRF-less) who present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction have worse outcomes.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample databases (2016 to 2020) was queried to identify STEMI admissions as a principal diagnosis using ICD 10 codes. The study population aged 18 to 45 years were divided into cohorts of SMuRF and SMuRF-less based on the presence of ≥1 risk factor (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking), and in-hospital outcomes were compared.

Results

41,990 patients were identified as the final study population. 38,495 patients were identified as SMuRF, and 3495 patients were SMuRF-less. Compared to SMuRF patients, SMuRF-less patients are more likely to be females (23.2 % vs. 21.2 %), have congestive heart failure (16.6 % vs. 13.7 %, p < 0.01) but less likely to have obesity (13.7 % vs 28.0 %, p < 0.01) In evaluating outcomes, SMuRF-less patients had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.6, CI 1.5–4.2, p < 0.01), Cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.8, CI 1.3–2.5, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.4, CI 1.0–1.9, p = 0.02), and Extramembrane Corporeal Oxygenation (aOR 4.1, CI 1.1–15.1, p = 0.03). Fluid and electrolyte abnormalities was an independent predictor of mortality among SMuRF-less patients (aOR 3.82, CI 1.3–11.2, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Young patients who present with STEMI and have no traditional cardiovascular risk factors have worse in-hospital outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of non-traditional risk factors on acute myocardial infarction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国无传统心血管风险因素的年轻成年人中 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的发病率、预测因素和住院治疗结果
背景高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和吸烟等标准可改变心血管风险因素(SMuRF)在动脉粥样硬化性疾病的病因学中早已确立。研究表明,没有上述任何危险因素(SMuRF-less)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后较差。方法查询全国住院患者抽样数据库(2016 年至 2020 年),使用 ICD 10 编码确定 STEMI 入院的主要诊断。根据是否存在≥1个风险因素(高血压、糖尿病、高脂血症和吸烟),将18至45岁的研究人群分为SMuRF和无SMuRF人群,并对住院结果进行比较。38,495名患者被确定为SMuRF,3495名患者无SMuRF。与 SMuRF 患者相比,无 SMuRF 患者更可能是女性(23.2% 对 21.2%)、充血性心力衰竭(16.6% 对 13.7%,P < 0.01),但更不可能肥胖(13.7% 对 28.0%,P < 0.01)。01)在评估结果时,无 SMuRF 患者的调整后院内死亡率(aOR 2.6,CI 1.5-4.2,p <0.01)、心源性休克(aOR 1.8, CI 1.3-2.5, p < 0.01)、急性肾损伤(aOR 1.4, CI 1.0-1.9, p = 0.02)和膜外体外氧合(aOR 4.1, CI 1.1-15.1, p = 0.03)。结论没有传统心血管风险因素的STEMI年轻患者院内预后较差。需要进一步研究评估非传统危险因素对急性心肌梗死的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
59 days
期刊最新文献
CMR and adverse clinical outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy The evaluation of combined fractional flow reserve and dynamic SPECT in chronic total occlusion Prevalence and risk factors associated with decompensated heart failure after successful elective cardioversion for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter Causal associations of Sjögren's syndrome with cardiovascular disease: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study Baseline inflammatory status affects the prognostic impact of statins in patients with peripheral arterial disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1