Performance in dairy cows and calves with or without cow-calf contact on pasture

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Livestock Science Pub Date : 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105502
Juni Rosann E. Johanssen , Steffen Adler , Julie Føske Johnsen , Kristin Sørheim , Knut Egil Bøe
{"title":"Performance in dairy cows and calves with or without cow-calf contact on pasture","authors":"Juni Rosann E. Johanssen ,&nbsp;Steffen Adler ,&nbsp;Julie Føske Johnsen ,&nbsp;Kristin Sørheim ,&nbsp;Knut Egil Bøe","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Interest in dairy cow-calf contact (CCC) systems is growing, yet limited research had been focused on CCC in a pasture setting. Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of pastured dairy cows and calves with or without CCC through machine milk yield and composition, cow body condition score (BCS) and body weight (BW) decrease, and calf body weight gain (BWG). We also examined calf intake of concentrates, artificially reared calves’ milk intake, and the health of both cows and calves. Conducted on a commercial dairy freestall farm and summer farm in Norway from May to August 2021, the study included twenty cow-calf pairs: 17 Norwegian Red (NRF) and three NRF × Holstein crossbreeds. They were divided into two treatments: cow-calf contact (CC, <em>n</em> = 10) or early separation (ES, <em>n</em> = 10), each with two groups of five cow-calf pairs. CC pairs had full CCC on pasture until 6 weeks postpartum and part-time contact in weeks 7 and 8 (weaning). ES pairs were separated 1–3 h after birth, kept on separate pastures with no contact between ES cows and calves. ES calves’ received daily milk allowances of 12–14 L (weeks 0–6), reduced to 8 L (week 7) and further to 4 L (week 8). From week 9, all calves were denied access to any milk (ES) or cows (CC). During weeks 0–6, CC cows had a daily machine milk yield 23.7 kg lower/cow than ES cows. The difference was likely affected by nursing and other factors (parity and inhibited milk ejection), and persisted during weaning, with CC cows delivering 8.3 kg less/cow/day in weeks 10 and 11 postpartum. Fat and protein content in machine milk showed no significant difference, while lactose content was lower in milk from CC cows than ES cows (week 5 postpartum). CC cows had a lower BW decrease compared to ES cows (CC: 913 g/day, ES: 1415 g/day from pasture day one through week 9). ES calves had an average milk intake of 10.7 L/calf/day (weeks 0–6), and consumed more concentrates than CC calves. Calves’ daily BWG did not differ between treatments in weeks 0–6 (CC: 1340 and ES: 1250 g/day) and decreased for both treatments during weaning (CC: 1050 g/day, ES: 920 g/day in weeks 6–9). Inhibited milk ejection during machine milking was a challenge in CC cows, prompting oxytocin injections to prevent mastitis. Allowing calves full CCC or providing whole milk near ad libitum can result in similar BWG and health in calves. Further research should explore strategies to enhance milk ejection in pastured CCC cows.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"285 ","pages":"Article 105502"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001094/pdfft?md5=1f5dace04650f1380cd62226fcb1c44e&pid=1-s2.0-S1871141324001094-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in dairy cow-calf contact (CCC) systems is growing, yet limited research had been focused on CCC in a pasture setting. Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of pastured dairy cows and calves with or without CCC through machine milk yield and composition, cow body condition score (BCS) and body weight (BW) decrease, and calf body weight gain (BWG). We also examined calf intake of concentrates, artificially reared calves’ milk intake, and the health of both cows and calves. Conducted on a commercial dairy freestall farm and summer farm in Norway from May to August 2021, the study included twenty cow-calf pairs: 17 Norwegian Red (NRF) and three NRF × Holstein crossbreeds. They were divided into two treatments: cow-calf contact (CC, n = 10) or early separation (ES, n = 10), each with two groups of five cow-calf pairs. CC pairs had full CCC on pasture until 6 weeks postpartum and part-time contact in weeks 7 and 8 (weaning). ES pairs were separated 1–3 h after birth, kept on separate pastures with no contact between ES cows and calves. ES calves’ received daily milk allowances of 12–14 L (weeks 0–6), reduced to 8 L (week 7) and further to 4 L (week 8). From week 9, all calves were denied access to any milk (ES) or cows (CC). During weeks 0–6, CC cows had a daily machine milk yield 23.7 kg lower/cow than ES cows. The difference was likely affected by nursing and other factors (parity and inhibited milk ejection), and persisted during weaning, with CC cows delivering 8.3 kg less/cow/day in weeks 10 and 11 postpartum. Fat and protein content in machine milk showed no significant difference, while lactose content was lower in milk from CC cows than ES cows (week 5 postpartum). CC cows had a lower BW decrease compared to ES cows (CC: 913 g/day, ES: 1415 g/day from pasture day one through week 9). ES calves had an average milk intake of 10.7 L/calf/day (weeks 0–6), and consumed more concentrates than CC calves. Calves’ daily BWG did not differ between treatments in weeks 0–6 (CC: 1340 and ES: 1250 g/day) and decreased for both treatments during weaning (CC: 1050 g/day, ES: 920 g/day in weeks 6–9). Inhibited milk ejection during machine milking was a challenge in CC cows, prompting oxytocin injections to prevent mastitis. Allowing calves full CCC or providing whole milk near ad libitum can result in similar BWG and health in calves. Further research should explore strategies to enhance milk ejection in pastured CCC cows.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奶牛和犊牛在牧场上接触或不接触的表现
人们对奶牛-犊牛接触(CCC)系统的兴趣与日俱增,但针对牧场环境中的CCC的研究却十分有限。我们的研究旨在通过机器产奶量和成分、奶牛体况评分(BCS)和体重(BW)降幅以及犊牛体重增重(BWG),评估有无CCC的牧场奶牛和犊牛的表现。我们还考察了犊牛的精料摄入量、人工饲养犊牛的牛奶摄入量以及奶牛和犊牛的健康状况。这项研究于2021年5月至8月在挪威的一个商业奶牛场和夏季牧场进行,包括20对母牛-犊牛:17头挪威红牛(NRF)和3头NRF×荷斯坦杂交牛。它们被分为两种处理:母牛-小牛接触(CC,n = 10)或早期分离(ES,n = 10),每种处理有两组,每组有五对母牛-小牛。在产后 6 周之前,CC 组的母牛与小牛在牧场上完全接触,而在第 7 周和第 8 周(断奶)则部分时间接触。ES牛对在产后1-3小时分开,饲养在不同的牧场上,ES牛和犊牛之间不接触。ES犊牛每天的奶量为12-14升(第0-6周),第7周降至8升,第8周进一步降至4升。从第 9 周开始,所有犊牛都不能接触任何牛奶(ES)或奶牛(CC)。在第0-6周,CC奶牛的日机产奶量比ES奶牛低23.7千克/头。这种差异可能受到哺乳和其他因素(奇偶性和射奶抑制)的影响,并在断奶期间持续存在,CC奶牛在产后第10周和第11周的机奶产量比ES奶牛低8.3千克/头。机挤奶中的脂肪和蛋白质含量无显著差异,而CC奶牛的乳糖含量低于ES奶牛(产后第5周)。与ES奶牛相比,CC奶牛的体重下降较少(从牧场第一天到第9周,CC:913克/天,ES:1415克/天)。ES犊牛的平均奶摄入量为10.7升/犊牛/天(第0-6周),比CC犊牛摄入更多的精料。不同处理的犊牛在第 0-6 周的日均体重没有差异(CC:1340 克/天,ES:1250 克/天),但在断奶期间,两种处理的犊牛日均体重都有所下降(第 6-9 周,CC:1050 克/天,ES:920 克/天)。CC奶牛在机器挤奶过程中出现排乳受阻的问题,因此需要注射催产素以预防乳腺炎。让犊牛完全饮用CCC奶或提供接近自由饮用的全脂奶,可使犊牛获得相似的体重和健康状况。进一步的研究应探索提高放牧CCC奶牛排乳能力的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
期刊最新文献
What is the impact of neutral detergent fibre digestibility on productive performance of beef cattle fed tropical forages? Characterization and mitigation measures for carbon dioxide, methane, and ammonia emissions in dairy barns Editorial Board Genetic markers associated with beef quality: A review Whole genome resequencing analysis elucidate genetic features and signature of selection in binhu buffaloes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1