Examining the nexus between oil shocks and sovereign credit risk: Multidimensional insights from major oil exporters

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE North American Journal of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-05-29 DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2024.102205
Nader Naifar
{"title":"Examining the nexus between oil shocks and sovereign credit risk: Multidimensional insights from major oil exporters","authors":"Nader Naifar","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2024.102205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper investigates the frequency and quantile connectedness between oil market shocks and sovereign credit risk of seven major oil exporting countries: Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Norway, the United States, Brazil, and Mexico. We apply the time-domain approach of <span>Diebold &amp; Yılmaz (2012)</span>, the frequency-domain approach of <span>Baruník &amp; Křehlík (2018)</span>, and the quantile-based connectedness approach of <span>Ando et al. (2018)</span>. Empirical results indicate that (i) spillover effects vary significantly across different investment horizons, with Mexico, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia emerging as key transmitters of credit risk volatility, (ii) the United Arab Emirates consistently appears as a major net receiver of these risks, highlighting its vulnerability to external shocks, (iii) in both short-term and long-term horizon, demand shocks stand out as the most influential determinants of volatility in sovereign credit risks, and (iv) during periods of heightened credit risk perception, the exacerbating role of oil demand shocks becomes more pronounced..</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 102205"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106294082400130X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the frequency and quantile connectedness between oil market shocks and sovereign credit risk of seven major oil exporting countries: Saudi Arabia, Russia, the United Arab Emirates, Norway, the United States, Brazil, and Mexico. We apply the time-domain approach of Diebold & Yılmaz (2012), the frequency-domain approach of Baruník & Křehlík (2018), and the quantile-based connectedness approach of Ando et al. (2018). Empirical results indicate that (i) spillover effects vary significantly across different investment horizons, with Mexico, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia emerging as key transmitters of credit risk volatility, (ii) the United Arab Emirates consistently appears as a major net receiver of these risks, highlighting its vulnerability to external shocks, (iii) in both short-term and long-term horizon, demand shocks stand out as the most influential determinants of volatility in sovereign credit risks, and (iv) during periods of heightened credit risk perception, the exacerbating role of oil demand shocks becomes more pronounced..

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究石油冲击与主权信用风险之间的关系:主要石油出口国的多层面见解
本文研究了七个主要石油出口国的石油市场冲击与主权信用风险之间的频率和数量联系:沙特阿拉伯、俄罗斯、阿拉伯联合酋长国、挪威、美国、巴西和墨西哥。我们采用了 Diebold & Yılmaz (2012)的时域方法、Baruník & Křehlík (2018)的频域方法和 Ando 等人(2018)的基于量子的关联性方法。实证结果表明:(i) 溢出效应在不同的投资期限内差异显著,墨西哥、巴西和沙特阿拉伯成为信贷风险波动的主要传播者;(ii) 阿拉伯联合酋长国一直是这些风险的主要净接收者、(ii)阿拉伯联合酋长国一直是这些风险的主要净接收者,这突出表明了其对外部冲击的脆弱性,(iii)在短期和长期范围内,需求冲击都是对主权信用风险波动影响最大的决定因素,(iv)在信用风险感知增强期间,石油需求冲击的加剧作用变得更加明显。.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
期刊最新文献
ESG rating and default risk: Evidence from China Decoding the stock market dynamics in the banking sector: Short versus long-term insights Static and dynamic return and volatility connectedness between transportation tokens and transportation indices: Evidence from quantile connectedness approach The role of digital transformation in mergers and acquisitions Spillover of fear among the US and BRICS equity markets during the COVID-19 crisis and the Russo-Ukrainian conflict
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1