“The reality in the DRC is just not the reality in Rwanda” – How context factors affect transdisciplinary research projects

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105035
Rea Pärli , Moustapha Byamungu , Manuel Fischer , Speciose Kantengwa , Kokou Kintche , Matieyedou Konlambigue , Eva Lieberherr , Johan Six , Benjamin Wilde , Leonhard Späth
{"title":"“The reality in the DRC is just not the reality in Rwanda” – How context factors affect transdisciplinary research projects","authors":"Rea Pärli ,&nbsp;Moustapha Byamungu ,&nbsp;Manuel Fischer ,&nbsp;Speciose Kantengwa ,&nbsp;Kokou Kintche ,&nbsp;Matieyedou Konlambigue ,&nbsp;Eva Lieberherr ,&nbsp;Johan Six ,&nbsp;Benjamin Wilde ,&nbsp;Leonhard Späth","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Transitioning toward more sustainable livelihoods requires tackling complex challenges in innovative ways. Positioned at the intersection of innovation and transition studies, transdisciplinary research (TD) has surfaced as a method to confront sustainability challenges by integrating various scientific disciplines and engaging non-academic stakeholders. Currently, there is a growing call from both policy makers and research funders to assess the effects of TD research, especially its societal impacts. However, TD research typically involves local projects where the context may substantially shape the effects of the research conducted. In this paper we explore how understanding the context factors of a TD project contributes to the understanding of its effects. We built a working model, based on different established concepts from policy studies to conceptualize context and effects of TD project. We applied the model to a comparative case study of two regional sub-projects of one large TD project on circular bioeconomy for sustainable agriculture in Sub Saharan Africa. The core concept and design were the same for both subprojects, but they achieved different effects. We studied the differences in context factors to explain this variation. We found that a strongly developed public and private sector and access to a variety of action resources such as political support or laws, supported the implementation of innovations as well as dialogue with policy. Nevertheless, a strong public sector can also hinder a project's success, if the interest of the government is not in line with the interests of the project. Further, we found that TD projects may achieve learning and social effects by tackling certain gaps in action resources. Our findings highlight that taking the context of a project into account is key to understanding the scope of action and possibilities of a project. Thus, the context should be considered not only when planning but also - and especially - when evaluating a TD project.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000842/pdfft?md5=23cb8da7cd8130794bd6d39ecbdeb15e&pid=1-s2.0-S0048733324000842-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324000842","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transitioning toward more sustainable livelihoods requires tackling complex challenges in innovative ways. Positioned at the intersection of innovation and transition studies, transdisciplinary research (TD) has surfaced as a method to confront sustainability challenges by integrating various scientific disciplines and engaging non-academic stakeholders. Currently, there is a growing call from both policy makers and research funders to assess the effects of TD research, especially its societal impacts. However, TD research typically involves local projects where the context may substantially shape the effects of the research conducted. In this paper we explore how understanding the context factors of a TD project contributes to the understanding of its effects. We built a working model, based on different established concepts from policy studies to conceptualize context and effects of TD project. We applied the model to a comparative case study of two regional sub-projects of one large TD project on circular bioeconomy for sustainable agriculture in Sub Saharan Africa. The core concept and design were the same for both subprojects, but they achieved different effects. We studied the differences in context factors to explain this variation. We found that a strongly developed public and private sector and access to a variety of action resources such as political support or laws, supported the implementation of innovations as well as dialogue with policy. Nevertheless, a strong public sector can also hinder a project's success, if the interest of the government is not in line with the interests of the project. Further, we found that TD projects may achieve learning and social effects by tackling certain gaps in action resources. Our findings highlight that taking the context of a project into account is key to understanding the scope of action and possibilities of a project. Thus, the context should be considered not only when planning but also - and especially - when evaluating a TD project.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"刚果民主共和国的现实与卢旺达的现实不同"--背景因素如何影响跨学科研究项目
向更可持续的生计过渡需要以创新的方式应对复杂的挑战。跨学科研究(TD)是创新与转型研究的交叉学科,是通过整合各种科学学科并让非学术利益相关者参与进来来应对可持续性挑战的一种方法。目前,政策制定者和研究资助者越来越多地呼吁评估跨学科研究的效果,特别是其社会影响。然而,技术促进发展研究通常涉及地方项目,其背景可能会在很大程度上影响所开展研究的效果。在本文中,我们探讨了了解贸易发展项目的背景因素如何有助于了解其效果。我们根据政策研究中不同的既定概念,建立了一个工作模型,以对贸易发展项目的背景和效果进行概念化。我们将该模型应用于对撒哈拉以南非洲循环生物经济促进可持续农业大型技术开发项目的两个地区子项目的比较案例研究。两个子项目的核心理念和设计相同,但取得的效果不同。我们研究了背景因素的差异,以解释这种差异。我们发现,发达的公共和私营部门以及获得各种行动资源(如政治支持或法律)的途径,有助于创新的实施以及与政策的对话。然而,如果政府的利益与项目的利益不一致,强大的公共部门也会阻碍项目的成功。此外,我们还发现,贸易发展项目可以通过解决行动资源方面的某些差距来实现学习和社会效应。我们的研究结果突出表明,考虑项目背景是了解项目行动范围和可能性的关键。因此,不仅在规划时,而且特别是在评估技术促进发展项目时,都应考虑项目的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
Transformation of the governance of failure for radical innovation: The role of strategic leaders How media portrayal of CEO overconfidence impacts radical innovation The determinants of parallel invention: Measuring the role of information sharing and personal interaction between inventors Do the elite university projects promote scientific research competitiveness: Evidence from NSFC grants The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1