{"title":"Blended Implementation of Existing Precollege Engineering Programs: Teacher Perspectives of Program Impact","authors":"Medha Dalal;Assad Iqbal;Adam R. Carberry","doi":"10.1109/TE.2023.3338610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers (\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${n}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n = 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.","PeriodicalId":55011,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10376265","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10376265/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Contribution: This work examines the impact of a unique precollege STEM education initiative during its two pilot years. The study contributes to the growing body of research by unpacking the needs of and the impact on an important stakeholder group (i.e., the teachers) in the engineering education ecosystem to help inform the future design and development of teacher professional learning models. Background: Efforts to provide precollege students with engineering or robotics-specific experiences are on the rise. These efforts are typically undertaken independently of one another. A first-of-its-kind collaboration between two precollege STEM initiatives aimed to break down existing silos between programs and offer a blended engineering and robotics curriculum targeting underserved schools. Research Questions: 1) How does a program designed to blend two existing engineering and robotics programs at the secondary school level impact teachers? and 2) What program elements are deemed valuable by participating teachers who are implementing a blended engineering and robotics program at the secondary school level? Methodology: Four focus groups were conducted with teachers (
${n}$
= 16) over a period of two years. Data was analyzed using open coding and constant comparison methods. Findings: Four themes of growing confidence, exercising agency, responsive professional development, and support structures emerged across the four datasets. Collectively these themes capture pragmatic understandings of offering a new, blended precollege STEM program and advance an argument for the involvement of all stakeholders to support the teachers.
期刊介绍:
The IEEE Transactions on Education (ToE) publishes significant and original scholarly contributions to education in electrical and electronics engineering, computer engineering, computer science, and other fields within the scope of interest of IEEE. Contributions must address discovery, integration, and/or application of knowledge in education in these fields. Articles must support contributions and assertions with compelling evidence and provide explicit, transparent descriptions of the processes through which the evidence is collected, analyzed, and interpreted. While characteristics of compelling evidence cannot be described to address every conceivable situation, generally assessment of the work being reported must go beyond student self-report and attitudinal data.