Epinephrine Dosing Intervals Are Associated With Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-04 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006334
Martha F Kienzle, Ryan W Morgan, Ron W Reeder, Tageldin Ahmed, Robert A Berg, Robert Bishop, Matthew Bochkoris, Joseph A Carcillo, Todd C Carpenter, Kellimarie K Cooper, J Wesley Diddle, Myke Federman, Richard Fernandez, Deborah Franzon, Aisha H Frazier, Stuart H Friess, Meg Frizzola, Kathryn Graham, Mark Hall, Christopher Horvat, Leanna L Huard, Tensing Maa, Arushi Manga, Patrick S McQuillen, Kathleen L Meert, Peter M Mourani, Vinay M Nadkarni, Maryam Y Naim, Murray M Pollack, Anil Sapru, Carleen Schneiter, Matthew P Sharron, Sarah Tabbutt, Shirley Viteri, Heather A Wolfe, Robert M Sutton
{"title":"Epinephrine Dosing Intervals Are Associated With Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Martha F Kienzle, Ryan W Morgan, Ron W Reeder, Tageldin Ahmed, Robert A Berg, Robert Bishop, Matthew Bochkoris, Joseph A Carcillo, Todd C Carpenter, Kellimarie K Cooper, J Wesley Diddle, Myke Federman, Richard Fernandez, Deborah Franzon, Aisha H Frazier, Stuart H Friess, Meg Frizzola, Kathryn Graham, Mark Hall, Christopher Horvat, Leanna L Huard, Tensing Maa, Arushi Manga, Patrick S McQuillen, Kathleen L Meert, Peter M Mourani, Vinay M Nadkarni, Maryam Y Naim, Murray M Pollack, Anil Sapru, Carleen Schneiter, Matthew P Sharron, Sarah Tabbutt, Shirley Viteri, Heather A Wolfe, Robert M Sutton","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Data to support epinephrine dosing intervals during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are conflicting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epinephrine dosing intervals and outcomes. We hypothesized that dosing intervals less than 3 minutes would be associated with improved neurologic survival compared with greater than or equal to 3 minutes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study is a secondary analysis of The ICU-RESUScitation Project (NCT028374497), a multicenter trial of a quality improvement bundle of physiology-directed CPR training and post-cardiac arrest debriefing.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eighteen PICUs and pediatric cardiac ICUs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Subjects were 18 years young or younger and 37 weeks old or older corrected gestational age who had an index cardiac arrest. Patients who received less than two doses of epinephrine, received extracorporeal CPR, or had dosing intervals greater than 8 minutes were excluded.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The primary exposure was an epinephrine dosing interval of less than 3 vs. greater than or equal to 3 minutes.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcome was survival to discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2 or no change from baseline. Regression models evaluated the association between dosing intervals and: 1) survival outcomes and 2) CPR duration. Among 382 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, median age was 0.9 years (interquartile range 0.3-7.6 yr) and 45% were female. After adjustment for confounders, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with survival with favorable neurologic outcome (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84-1.46; p = 0.48) but were associated with improved sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (aRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37; p < 0.01) and shorter CPR duration (adjusted effect estimate, -9.5 min; 95% CI, -14.4 to -4.84 min; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients receiving at least two doses of epinephrine, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with neurologic outcome but were associated with sustained ROSC and shorter CPR duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11326980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006334","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Data to support epinephrine dosing intervals during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are conflicting. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between epinephrine dosing intervals and outcomes. We hypothesized that dosing intervals less than 3 minutes would be associated with improved neurologic survival compared with greater than or equal to 3 minutes.

Design: This study is a secondary analysis of The ICU-RESUScitation Project (NCT028374497), a multicenter trial of a quality improvement bundle of physiology-directed CPR training and post-cardiac arrest debriefing.

Setting: Eighteen PICUs and pediatric cardiac ICUs in the United States.

Patients: Subjects were 18 years young or younger and 37 weeks old or older corrected gestational age who had an index cardiac arrest. Patients who received less than two doses of epinephrine, received extracorporeal CPR, or had dosing intervals greater than 8 minutes were excluded.

Interventions: The primary exposure was an epinephrine dosing interval of less than 3 vs. greater than or equal to 3 minutes.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was survival to discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2 or no change from baseline. Regression models evaluated the association between dosing intervals and: 1) survival outcomes and 2) CPR duration. Among 382 patients meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria, median age was 0.9 years (interquartile range 0.3-7.6 yr) and 45% were female. After adjustment for confounders, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with survival with favorable neurologic outcome (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.84-1.46; p = 0.48) but were associated with improved sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (aRR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.07-1.37; p < 0.01) and shorter CPR duration (adjusted effect estimate, -9.5 min; 95% CI, -14.4 to -4.84 min; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: In patients receiving at least two doses of epinephrine, dosing intervals less than 3 minutes were not associated with neurologic outcome but were associated with sustained ROSC and shorter CPR duration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾上腺素给药间隔与小儿院内心脏骤停结果有关:一项多中心研究。
目的:支持心肺复苏(CPR)期间肾上腺素给药间隔的数据相互矛盾。本研究旨在评估肾上腺素给药间隔与结果之间的关联。我们假设,与大于或等于 3 分钟相比,给药间隔小于 3 分钟将与神经系统存活率的提高有关:本研究是 ICU-RESUScitation 项目(NCT028374497)的二次分析,该项目是一项关于生理学指导心肺复苏培训和心脏骤停后汇报的质量改进捆绑多中心试验:环境:美国18所儿科重症监护病房和儿科心脏重症监护病房:受试者:年龄为 18 岁或以下,正确胎龄为 37 周或以上,发生过心脏骤停。接受肾上腺素剂量少于两剂、接受体外心肺复苏或用药间隔时间超过 8 分钟的患者排除在外:主要暴露指标为肾上腺素给药间隔少于 3 分钟与大于或等于 3 分钟:主要结果是出院后的存活率和良好的神经系统结果,良好的神经系统结果定义为小儿脑功能分类评分为1-2分或与基线相比无变化。回归模型评估了给药间隔与以下两个因素之间的关系:1)存活率;2)心肺复苏率:1)生存结果;2)心肺复苏持续时间。在符合纳入和排除标准的 382 名患者中,中位年龄为 0.9 岁(四分位间范围为 0.3-7.6 岁),45% 为女性。在对混杂因素进行调整后,给药间隔少于 3 分钟与存活率和良好的神经功能预后无关(调整后相对风险 [aRR],1.10;95% CI,0.84-1.46;P = 0.48),但与自发循环持续恢复(ROSC)改善(aRR,1.21;95% CI,1.07-1.37;p <0.01)和心肺复苏持续时间缩短(调整后效应估计值,-9.5 分钟;95% CI,-14.4 至 -4.84 分钟;p <0.01)有关:在接受至少两剂肾上腺素治疗的患者中,用药间隔少于3分钟与神经功能预后无关,但与持续ROSC和更短的心肺复苏持续时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Time Controlled Adaptive Ventilation/Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Can be Used Effectively in Patients With or at High Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome "Time is the Soul of the World" Pythagoras. Caution-Do Not Attempt This at Home. Airway Pressure Release Ventilation Should Not Routinely Be Used in Patients With or at Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Outside of a Clinical Trial. Resuscitation for Donation After Brain Death: Respecting Autonomy and Maximizing Utility. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Organ Preservation After Death Risks Public Trust and Requires Explicit Consent. Two Weeks Versus One Week of Maximal Patient-Intensivist Continuity for Adult Medical Intensive Care Patients: A Two-Center Target Trial Emulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1