Reconsidering the Lessons Learned from the 1970 Southern Corn Leaf Blight Epidemic.

IF 2.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES Phytopathology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1094/PHYTO-03-24-0105-PER
Peter Balint-Kurti, Jerald Pataky
{"title":"Reconsidering the Lessons Learned from the 1970 Southern Corn Leaf Blight Epidemic.","authors":"Peter Balint-Kurti, Jerald Pataky","doi":"10.1094/PHYTO-03-24-0105-PER","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The southern corn leaf blight epidemic of 1970 caused estimated losses of about 16% for the U.S. corn crop, equivalent to about $8 billion in current terms. The epidemic was caused by the prevalence of Texas male sterile cytoplasm (<i>cms</i>-T), used to produce most of the hybrid corn seed planted that year, combined with the emergence of a novel race of the fungus <i>Cochliobolus heterostrophus</i> that was exquisitely virulent on <i>cms</i>-T corn. Remarkably, the epidemic lasted just a single year. This episode has often been portrayed in the literature and textbooks over the last 50 years as a catastrophic mistake perpetrated by corn breeders and seed companies of the time who did not understand or account for the dangers of crop genetic uniformity. In this perspective article, we aim to present an alternative interpretation of these events. First, we contend that, rather than being caused by a grievous error on the part of the corn breeding and seed industry, this epidemic was a particularly unfortunate, unusual, and unlucky consequence of a technological advancement intended to improve the efficiency of corn seed production for America's farmers. Second, we tell the story of the resolution of the epidemic as an example of timely, meticulously applied research in the public sector for the public good.</p>","PeriodicalId":20410,"journal":{"name":"Phytopathology","volume":" ","pages":"2007-2016"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-24-0105-PER","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The southern corn leaf blight epidemic of 1970 caused estimated losses of about 16% for the U.S. corn crop, equivalent to about $8 billion in current terms. The epidemic was caused by the prevalence of Texas male sterile cytoplasm (cms-T), used to produce most of the hybrid corn seed planted that year, combined with the emergence of a novel race of the fungus Cochliobolus heterostrophus that was exquisitely virulent on cms-T corn. Remarkably, the epidemic lasted just a single year. This episode has often been portrayed in the literature and textbooks over the last 50 years as a catastrophic mistake perpetrated by corn breeders and seed companies of the time who did not understand or account for the dangers of crop genetic uniformity. In this perspective article, we aim to present an alternative interpretation of these events. First, we contend that, rather than being caused by a grievous error on the part of the corn breeding and seed industry, this epidemic was a particularly unfortunate, unusual, and unlucky consequence of a technological advancement intended to improve the efficiency of corn seed production for America's farmers. Second, we tell the story of the resolution of the epidemic as an example of timely, meticulously applied research in the public sector for the public good.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新考虑从 1970 年南方玉米叶枯病疫情中吸取的教训。
据估计,1970 年南方玉米叶枯病疫情给美国玉米作物造成了约 16% 的损失,按当前价格计算相当于约 80 亿美元。造成这一流行病的原因是得克萨斯雄性不育细胞质(cms-T)的盛行,而该年种植的大部分杂交玉米种子都是用这种细胞质生产的,再加上出现了一种对 cms-T 玉米具有极强毒性的新型异养鞘氨醇真菌(Cochliobolus heterostrophus)。值得注意的是,疫情只持续了一年。在过去 50 年的文献和教科书中,这一事件经常被描述为当时的玉米育种者和种子公司犯下的灾难性错误,他们不了解或没有考虑到作物基因一致性的危险。在这篇透视文章中,我们旨在对这些事件提出另一种解释。首先,我们认为,这一流行病不是玉米育种和种子行业的严重错误造成的,而是旨在为美国农民提高玉米种子生产效率的技术进步带来的特别不幸、不寻常和不走运的后果。其次,我们把解决这一疫情的故事作为公共部门及时、细致地开展公益应用研究的一个范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Phytopathology
Phytopathology 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytopathology publishes articles on fundamental research that advances understanding of the nature of plant diseases, the agents that cause them, their spread, the losses they cause, and measures that can be used to control them. Phytopathology considers manuscripts covering all aspects of plant diseases including bacteriology, host-parasite biochemistry and cell biology, biological control, disease control and pest management, description of new pathogen species description of new pathogen species, ecology and population biology, epidemiology, disease etiology, host genetics and resistance, mycology, nematology, plant stress and abiotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins, and virology. Papers dealing mainly with taxonomy, such as descriptions of new plant pathogen taxa are acceptable if they include plant disease research results such as pathogenicity, host range, etc. Taxonomic papers that focus on classification, identification, and nomenclature below the subspecies level may also be submitted to Phytopathology.
期刊最新文献
First Reported Sexual Recombination Between Pyrenophora teres Isolates from Barley and Barley Grass. Mapping Seedling and Adult Plant Leaf Rust Resistance Genes in the Durum Wheat Cultivar Strongfield and Other Triticum turgidum Lines. An Engineered Citrus Tristeza Virus (T36CA)-Based Vector Induces Gene-Specific RNA Silencing and Is Graft Transmissible to Commercial Citrus Varieties. Investigation of the effectiveness and molecular mechanisms of thiamin priming to control early blight disease in potato. Genetic Variability and Evolutionary Dynamics of Papaya Ringspot Virus and Papaya Leaf Distortion Mosaic Virus Infecting Feral Papaya in Hainan Island.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1