La littératie en santé : destinée à l’amélioration de la santé ?

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sante Publique Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3917/spub.242.0013
Paul Guingal
{"title":"La littératie en santé : destinée à l’amélioration de la santé ?","authors":"Paul Guingal","doi":"10.3917/spub.242.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health literacy is a major public health issue. It directly influences the health-related decisions that individuals make. Improved health literacy is also directly correlated with better health. On the basis of this correlation, health literacy has ostensibly taken on the function of improving and maintaining good health. However, there is no evidence that health literacy, and hence the decisions it generates, are aimed at improving health.</p><p><strong>Purpose of the research: </strong>The aim of our study is to describe, using data collected via the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), the framework underpinning the health literacy in those surveyed. This allows us to verify whether or not this framework is aligned with the objective of promoting or maintaining health.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health literacy is not governed by the objective of improving health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health literacy is not necessarily cultivated in a bid to improve personal health. Health-related decision-making (as a product of health literacy) is governed, at least in part, by other forces than that of the desire to improve health. We need to move beyond the model that reduces health literacy, and therefore health decision-making, to a purely rational and individual process aimed exclusively at promoting or maintaining personal health.</p>","PeriodicalId":49575,"journal":{"name":"Sante Publique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sante Publique","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/spub.242.0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health literacy is a major public health issue. It directly influences the health-related decisions that individuals make. Improved health literacy is also directly correlated with better health. On the basis of this correlation, health literacy has ostensibly taken on the function of improving and maintaining good health. However, there is no evidence that health literacy, and hence the decisions it generates, are aimed at improving health.

Purpose of the research: The aim of our study is to describe, using data collected via the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ), the framework underpinning the health literacy in those surveyed. This allows us to verify whether or not this framework is aligned with the objective of promoting or maintaining health.

Results: Health literacy is not governed by the objective of improving health.

Conclusions: Health literacy is not necessarily cultivated in a bid to improve personal health. Health-related decision-making (as a product of health literacy) is governed, at least in part, by other forces than that of the desire to improve health. We need to move beyond the model that reduces health literacy, and therefore health decision-making, to a purely rational and individual process aimed exclusively at promoting or maintaining personal health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
卫生知识普及:旨在改善健康吗?
导言健康素养是一个重大的公共卫生问题。它直接影响个人做出与健康有关的决定。健康素养的提高也与健康状况的改善直接相关。基于这种相关性,健康素养表面上具有改善和保持健康的功能。然而,并没有证据表明,健康素养及其所产生的决定是以改善健康为目的的:我们的研究目的是通过健康素养问卷(HLQ)收集的数据,描述受访者健康素养的基础框架。这样,我们就能验证这一框架是否与促进或保持健康的目标相一致:结果:健康素养不受改善健康目标的制约:健康素养的培养不一定是为了改善个人健康。与健康相关的决策(作为健康素养的产物)至少部分受制于改善健康的愿望之外的其他力量。我们需要超越将健康素养以及健康决策归结为一个纯粹理性和个人的过程的模式,这一过程的目的完全是为了促进或保持个人健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sante Publique
Sante Publique PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
252
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: La revue Santé Publique s’adresse à l’ensemble des acteurs de santé publique qu’ils soient décideurs, professionnels de santé, acteurs de terrain, chercheurs, enseignants ou formateurs, etc. Elle publie des travaux de recherche, des évaluations, des analyses d’action, des réflexions sur des interventions de santé, des opinions, relevant des champs de la santé publique et de l’analyse des services de soins, des sciences sociales et de l’action sociale. Santé publique est une revue à comité de lecture, multidisciplinaire et généraliste, qui publie sur l’ensemble des thèmes de la santé publique parmi lesquels : accès et recours aux soins, déterminants et inégalités sociales de santé, prévention, éducation pour la santé, promotion de la santé, organisation des soins, environnement, formation des professionnels de santé, nutrition, politiques de santé, pratiques professionnelles, qualité des soins, gestion des risques sanitaires, représentation et santé perçue, santé scolaire, santé et travail, systèmes de santé, systèmes d’information, veille sanitaire, déterminants de la consommation de soins, organisation et économie des différents secteurs de production de soins (hôpital, médicament, etc.), évaluation médico-économique d’activités de soins ou de prévention et de programmes de santé, planification des ressources, politiques de régulation et de financement, etc
期刊最新文献
Pratiques professionnelles et soins dentaires non programmés en Nouvelle-Aquitaine La santé publique : des fonctions, des compétences, des valeurs ? Insuffisances des réponses aux viols à Ouagadougou : réflexions à partir du vécu de jeunes survivantes Évaluation du dispositif Tuto’Tour de la grossesse chez les femmes fumeuses enceintes vulnérables Après la pilule. Le choix contraceptif des jeunes femmes à l’épreuve du rejet des hormones
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1