The Medical Student Guide to Pharmacy: Piloting an Interactive Textbook on Basic Pharmacology Principles and Clinical Correlations.

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23821205231225589
Kendra L Walsh, Sarita S Warrier
{"title":"<i>The Medical Student Guide to Pharmacy</i>: Piloting an Interactive Textbook on Basic Pharmacology Principles and Clinical Correlations.","authors":"Kendra L Walsh, Sarita S Warrier","doi":"10.1177/23821205231225589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite the wide use of medications in clinical practice, graduating medical students often feel unprepared for the task of prescribing upon starting residency. With recent educational initiatives aiming to transform learning modalities, we sought to pilot an interactive textbook on basic pharmacology principles at our institution as a supplement to first-year lectures and assess its subjective impact on students' knowledge of content as well as confidence to apply material in the real world through pre- and post-intervention surveys.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>First-year medical students were invited to complete non-validated, voluntary, anonymous, emailed, online surveys consisting of Likert scale and free-text response questions. Our investigation served as a pilot test for future iterations of this research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Response rates for the pre- and post-intervention surveys were 73/145 (50%) and 38/145 (26%), respectively, with the post-intervention survey further reduced to 13 individuals who indicated use of the interactive textbook. Questions regarding interactive textbook chapters that overlapped with course content were excluded from data analysis due to an inability to separate learning gains from lectures versus the interactive textbook. Post-intervention survey responses all showed significant changes in mean Likert scale scores on student-perceived knowledge and confidence to apply material with <i>P</i> < .001. Free-text response questions revealed limited exposure to the field of pharmacy and interactions with pharmacists prior to medical school.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our pilot study on the initial use of an interactive textbook titled <i>The Medical Student Guide to Pharmacy</i> presented us with valuable insight into providing first-year medical students with a clinically oriented supplemental resource within coursework on basic pharmacology. Challenges for the future include better integrating the interactive textbook into class lectures to facilitate increased use by students as well as developing more targeted, validated assessments of the impact it has on students' learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"11 ","pages":"23821205231225589"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149439/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205231225589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the wide use of medications in clinical practice, graduating medical students often feel unprepared for the task of prescribing upon starting residency. With recent educational initiatives aiming to transform learning modalities, we sought to pilot an interactive textbook on basic pharmacology principles at our institution as a supplement to first-year lectures and assess its subjective impact on students' knowledge of content as well as confidence to apply material in the real world through pre- and post-intervention surveys.

Methods: First-year medical students were invited to complete non-validated, voluntary, anonymous, emailed, online surveys consisting of Likert scale and free-text response questions. Our investigation served as a pilot test for future iterations of this research.

Results: Response rates for the pre- and post-intervention surveys were 73/145 (50%) and 38/145 (26%), respectively, with the post-intervention survey further reduced to 13 individuals who indicated use of the interactive textbook. Questions regarding interactive textbook chapters that overlapped with course content were excluded from data analysis due to an inability to separate learning gains from lectures versus the interactive textbook. Post-intervention survey responses all showed significant changes in mean Likert scale scores on student-perceived knowledge and confidence to apply material with P < .001. Free-text response questions revealed limited exposure to the field of pharmacy and interactions with pharmacists prior to medical school.

Conclusion: Our pilot study on the initial use of an interactive textbook titled The Medical Student Guide to Pharmacy presented us with valuable insight into providing first-year medical students with a clinically oriented supplemental resource within coursework on basic pharmacology. Challenges for the future include better integrating the interactive textbook into class lectures to facilitate increased use by students as well as developing more targeted, validated assessments of the impact it has on students' learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医学生药学指南》:试行关于基本药理学原理和临床相关性的互动教科书。
目的:尽管药物在临床实践中被广泛使用,但即将毕业的医科学生在开始实习时往往对处方任务感到毫无准备。最近的教育倡议旨在转变学习方式,我们试图在本院试用一本关于基本药理学原理的互动式教科书,作为一年级授课的补充,并通过干预前后的调查评估其对学生对内容的了解程度以及在现实世界中应用教材的信心的主观影响:邀请医学专业一年级学生填写未经验证的、自愿的、匿名的、通过电子邮件发送的在线调查,其中包括李克特量表和自由文本回答问题。我们的调查为本研究未来的迭代提供了试点测试:干预前和干预后调查的回复率分别为 73/145(50%)和 38/145(26%),干预后调查的回复率进一步降低,只有 13 人表示使用过互动教科书。有关互动课本章节与课程内容重叠的问题被排除在数据分析之外,因为无法将讲课与互动课本的学习收获区分开来。干预后的调查反馈均显示,学生在应用教材的知识和信心方面的平均李克特量表得分有显著变化,P < .001。自由文本回答问题显示,学生在医学院就读之前接触药学领域和与药剂师交流的机会有限:我们对名为《医学生药学指南》的互动式教科书的初步使用情况进行了试点研究,为我们在基础药理学课程中为一年级医学生提供临床导向的补充资源提供了宝贵的见解。未来的挑战包括更好地将互动式教科书融入课堂讲授,以促进学生更多地使用该教科书,以及对其对学生学习的影响进行更有针对性的有效评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Engagement in Extracurricular Activities During Medical School: A Cross-Sectional Study on Student Motivations and Challenges. The State of Academic Bullying Among Medical Students in Tanzania: Prevalence, Forms and Associated Factors. A Cross-Sectional Study. Student Critical Self-Reflection and Perceptions of Video-Based Pro-Section Computer-Assisted Instruction. Does Medical Education Require Radical Change? The Role of Information Visualisation and Anecdotal Evidence in Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning Process: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1