Validity based on the response processes of the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofuncional Clinical History.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY CoDAS Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20242023109pt
Alexia Stéfanny Menezes da Conceição Dos Santos, Yasmim Dourado Goes, Herick Santos Assis, Maria Vanessa Martins Alves, Amanda Tafnes Soares de Melo, Geovania Dias Barbora, Íkaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto, Elisdete Maria Santos de Jesus, Giédre Berretin-Felix, Andréa Monteiro Correia Medeiros
{"title":"Validity based on the response processes of the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofuncional Clinical History.","authors":"Alexia Stéfanny Menezes da Conceição Dos Santos, Yasmim Dourado Goes, Herick Santos Assis, Maria Vanessa Martins Alves, Amanda Tafnes Soares de Melo, Geovania Dias Barbora, Íkaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto, Elisdete Maria Santos de Jesus, Giédre Berretin-Felix, Andréa Monteiro Correia Medeiros","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20242023109pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Present the step of evidence of validity based on the responses to procedures of the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Study developed according to phonoaudiologic tests validations recommendations. Validity analysis performed based on the process of instrument response. Ten speech therapists, that work on phonoaudiology clinic and/or orofacial myofunctional research on the population with age between 6 to 71 months, participated and applied the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History with those responsible for the children. The speech therapists appraised the instrument applicability via Google®️ electronic forms, containing dichotic and/or multiple-choice questions, and likert scale with space to justify negative answers. The data was tabulated on Microsoft Excel 2016®️ worksheets and analyzed by the content validity index (CVI). The software R Core Team 2022 (Versão 4.2.2) was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All items from the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History were valid when applied to real contexts. Orofacial Myofunctional Clinic history protocol- IVC 100% in terms of ease of application and filling and usage in professional practice; IVC 90% in terms of usefulness for phonoaudiology clinic. The instructional got IVC 80% in terms of clinic usefulness and 70% regarding to the prior reading necessity to fill the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Instrucional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History, in the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers had its validity proven based on the processes of responses to the usage on phonoaudiology clinic.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166033/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023109pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Present the step of evidence of validity based on the responses to procedures of the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History.

Methods: Study developed according to phonoaudiologic tests validations recommendations. Validity analysis performed based on the process of instrument response. Ten speech therapists, that work on phonoaudiology clinic and/or orofacial myofunctional research on the population with age between 6 to 71 months, participated and applied the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History with those responsible for the children. The speech therapists appraised the instrument applicability via Google®️ electronic forms, containing dichotic and/or multiple-choice questions, and likert scale with space to justify negative answers. The data was tabulated on Microsoft Excel 2016®️ worksheets and analyzed by the content validity index (CVI). The software R Core Team 2022 (Versão 4.2.2) was used.

Results: All items from the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers: Instructional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History were valid when applied to real contexts. Orofacial Myofunctional Clinic history protocol- IVC 100% in terms of ease of application and filling and usage in professional practice; IVC 90% in terms of usefulness for phonoaudiology clinic. The instructional got IVC 80% in terms of clinic usefulness and 70% regarding to the prior reading necessity to fill the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers.

Conclusion: The Instrucional and Orofacial Myofunctional Clinical History, in the MMBGR Protocol Infants and Preschoolers had its validity proven based on the processes of responses to the usage on phonoaudiology clinic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于婴儿和学龄前儿童 MMBGR 协议响应过程的有效性:教学和口唇肌音临床病史。
目的:根据婴幼儿和学龄前儿童对 MMBGR 协议程序的反应,介绍有效性证据的步骤:方法:方法:根据语音听觉测试验证建议进行研究。根据仪器反应过程进行有效性分析。十名语言治疗师参与了这项研究,他们在语音听觉诊所和/或口面部肌功能研究机构工作,研究对象为年龄在 6 至 71 个月之间的人群,并应用了婴儿和学龄前儿童 MMBGR 协议:婴幼儿和学龄前儿童:教学和口面肌功能临床病史》。言语治疗师通过 Google®️ 电子表格对该工具的适用性进行评估,该表格包含二分法和/或多项选择题,以及李克特量表,并留有空格说明否定答案的理由。数据在 Microsoft Excel 2016®️ 工作表中制表,并通过内容效度指数(CVI)进行分析。使用的软件是 R Core Team 2022(Versão 4.2.2):结果:《婴幼儿和学龄前儿童 MMBGR 协议》中的所有项目均有效:当应用于真实情境时,"婴幼儿和学龄前儿童:口腔肌肉功能临床病史 "教学和口腔肌肉功能临床病史中的所有项目都是有效的。口面肌功能临床病史协议--在易于应用和填写以及在专业实践中的使用方面,IVC 为 100%;在对语音听觉诊所的实用性方面,IVC 为 90%。就临床实用性而言,教学法的 IVC 为 80%;就填写婴儿和学龄前儿童 MMBGR 协议的事先阅读必要性而言,教学法的 IVC 为 70%:MMBGR协议中的婴幼儿和学龄前儿童教学和口面部肌肉功能临床病史的有效性已在语音听觉诊所的使用过程中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development and validation of Competing Sentence Test in Kannada. Activity ordering task: conceptualization and development of a novel context-based working memory task with a metacognitive facet. Development of a Comprehensive Cough Therapy Program (CCTP) for chronic cough in India: a qualitative study. Speech perception in the Specific Learning Disorder with and without Persistent Speech Sound Disorder. Analysis of brain activity for speech stimuli and child development of an infant with neurosyphilis: case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1