Protecting wilderness or rewilding? An ecoregion-based approach to identifying priority areas for the protection and restoration of natural processes for biodiversity conservation

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Journal for Nature Conservation Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126661
Brenda Maria Zoderer , Thomas Marsoner , Erich Tasser
{"title":"Protecting wilderness or rewilding? An ecoregion-based approach to identifying priority areas for the protection and restoration of natural processes for biodiversity conservation","authors":"Brenda Maria Zoderer ,&nbsp;Thomas Marsoner ,&nbsp;Erich Tasser","doi":"10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Amidst the global decline in biodiversity, there are growing calls for more ambitious conservation targets and practices, including a renewed focus on protecting and restoring natural processes. However, little is known about suitable areas for process-oriented conservation and its different strategies. In this paper, we identify priority areas for process-oriented conservation following an ecoregion-based approach. Using the Alpine Space programme area as a pilot study area, a Wilderness Quality Index is calculated and mapped based on spatial indicators reflecting variations in naturalness, human impact, remoteness, and ruggedness. To identify priority areas for process-oriented conservation, the 10% of areas with the highest wilderness quality are identified for each ecoregion (‘ecoregional approach’) and compared with the identification of the 10% wildest areas of the entire study area (‘conventional approach’). The results show significant differences in priority areas between the two approaches, with those identified by the ecoregional approach being of lower wilderness quality, more dispersed across the study region and different elevation classes, and smaller in size. The ecoregional approach results in a greater coverage of ecosystem- and species-level diversity, yet it highlights a greater need for complementing the protection of wilderness in less modified regions with rewilding initiatives and the expansion of the protected area network in ecoregions with significant human activity. Based on these findings, we discuss the potential and challenges that an ecoregion-based identification of priority areas brings for biodiversity conservation, protection and restoration practice, and local communities. The ecoregion-based approach and the findings of this study can inform initiatives under the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2030, in particular the target to ‘strictly protect’ 10% of the EU’s land and sea.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54898,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nature Conservation","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 126661"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124001109/pdfft?md5=5605a41dbb4f50be68bf01a5a7c9038f&pid=1-s2.0-S1617138124001109-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nature Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1617138124001109","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amidst the global decline in biodiversity, there are growing calls for more ambitious conservation targets and practices, including a renewed focus on protecting and restoring natural processes. However, little is known about suitable areas for process-oriented conservation and its different strategies. In this paper, we identify priority areas for process-oriented conservation following an ecoregion-based approach. Using the Alpine Space programme area as a pilot study area, a Wilderness Quality Index is calculated and mapped based on spatial indicators reflecting variations in naturalness, human impact, remoteness, and ruggedness. To identify priority areas for process-oriented conservation, the 10% of areas with the highest wilderness quality are identified for each ecoregion (‘ecoregional approach’) and compared with the identification of the 10% wildest areas of the entire study area (‘conventional approach’). The results show significant differences in priority areas between the two approaches, with those identified by the ecoregional approach being of lower wilderness quality, more dispersed across the study region and different elevation classes, and smaller in size. The ecoregional approach results in a greater coverage of ecosystem- and species-level diversity, yet it highlights a greater need for complementing the protection of wilderness in less modified regions with rewilding initiatives and the expansion of the protected area network in ecoregions with significant human activity. Based on these findings, we discuss the potential and challenges that an ecoregion-based identification of priority areas brings for biodiversity conservation, protection and restoration practice, and local communities. The ecoregion-based approach and the findings of this study can inform initiatives under the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2030, in particular the target to ‘strictly protect’ 10% of the EU’s land and sea.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护荒野还是野化?以生态区域为基础,确定保护和恢复自然过程以保护生物多样性的优先区域
随着全球生物多样性的减少,越来越多的人呼吁制定更宏伟的保护目标和做法,包括重新关注保护和恢复自然过程。然而,人们对以过程为导向的保护的合适区域及其不同策略知之甚少。在本文中,我们采用基于生态区域的方法,确定了以过程为导向的优先保护区域。以阿尔卑斯空间计划区域为试点研究区域,根据反映自然程度、人类影响、偏远程度和崎岖程度变化的空间指标,计算并绘制了荒野质量指数图。为了确定以过程为导向的优先保护区域,为每个生态区域确定了 10%荒野质量最高的区域("生态区域方法"),并与整个研究区域确定的 10%最荒野区域("传统方法")进行了比较。结果显示,这两种方法在优先区域方面存在显著差异,生态区域方法确定的区域荒野质量较低,在研究区域和不同海拔等级中更为分散,面积也更小。生态区域方法对生态系统和物种多样性的覆盖面更大,但同时也强调了在人类活动频繁的生态区域,更有必要通过野化计划和扩大保护区网络来补充对变化较少区域的荒野保护。基于这些发现,我们讨论了基于生态区域确定优先区域为生物多样性保护、保护和恢复实践以及当地社区带来的潜力和挑战。基于生态区域的方法和本研究的结果可为欧盟 2030 年生物多样性战略下的举措提供参考,特别是 "严格保护 "欧盟 10%的陆地和海洋的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Nature Conservation
Journal for Nature Conservation 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
7.9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal for Nature Conservation addresses concepts, methods and techniques for nature conservation. This international and interdisciplinary journal encourages collaboration between scientists and practitioners, including the integration of biodiversity issues with social and economic concepts. Therefore, conceptual, technical and methodological papers, as well as reviews, research papers, and short communications are welcomed from a wide range of disciplines, including theoretical ecology, landscape ecology, restoration ecology, ecological modelling, and others, provided that there is a clear connection and immediate relevance to nature conservation. Manuscripts without any immediate conservation context, such as inventories, distribution modelling, genetic studies, animal behaviour, plant physiology, will not be considered for this journal; though such data may be useful for conservationists and managers in the future, this is outside of the current scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Corrigendum to “Surviving the Tide: Assessing Guiana dolphin persistence amidst growing threats in a protected estuary in South-eastern Brazil” [J. Nature Conserv. 82 (2024) 126713] From virtue to sin: Is the installation of bat boxes an effective conservation measure or a potential pitfall for vulnerable bat species? Paying for green tide management or participating in cleanup activities? Testing and controlling for payment vehicle bias in the valuation of ecological damage caused by green tides Predicting climate driven habitat shifts for the Egyptian vulture in Punjab, Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1