Development and testing of the Perceived Wellbeing in Outdoor Shared Spaces (PWOSS) scale

IF 2.4 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Wellbeing Space and Society Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2024.100203
Craig W. McDougall , Stephen Malden , Kathleen Morrison , Sammy Mason , Andrew J. Williams , Ruth Jepson
{"title":"Development and testing of the Perceived Wellbeing in Outdoor Shared Spaces (PWOSS) scale","authors":"Craig W. McDougall ,&nbsp;Stephen Malden ,&nbsp;Kathleen Morrison ,&nbsp;Sammy Mason ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Williams ,&nbsp;Ruth Jepson","doi":"10.1016/j.wss.2024.100203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accessible and high quality shared outdoor open spaces, both built and natural, can be particularly beneficial for health and wellbeing. The design and quality of shared outdoor spaces are often modifiable and the health and wellbeing-promoting potential of such spaces can, therefore, be enhanced. However, optimal modification of shared outdoor spaces requires a greater understanding of perceptions and experiences. Citizen Science projects can be particularly valuable for capturing experiences of wellbeing in different environments and shared outdoor spaces, although suitable validated scales are lacking. This paper aims to develop and conduct psychometric testing on the Perceived Wellbeing in Shared Outdoor Spaces (PWOSS) Scale. The study involves three key phases of scale development and evaluation: (i) identifying suitable domains and generating initial items for the PWOSS Scale; (ii) pre-testing the PWOSS Scale and conducting item reduction analysis and factor extraction to refine the scale items using a sample of potential users from Edinburgh, Scotland (<em>n</em> <em>=</em> <em>137</em>); and (iii) evaluating the PWOSS Scale by testing for dimensionality, reliability and validity. The final PWOSS Scale consisted of nine-items. The factor analysis indicated a two-factor solution (positive and negative wellbeing. The results of the three phases suggest the PWOSS Scale is a valid and reliable scale that can aid our understanding of the link between wellbeing and shared outdoor spaces and environments. The PWOSS Scale offers significant value to Citizen Science projects and to urban planning and public health practitioners interested in modifying and adapting shared outdoor spaces to increase wellbeing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52616,"journal":{"name":"Wellbeing Space and Society","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100203"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000216/pdfft?md5=db6c654c20af6e69d028893dc3e95b28&pid=1-s2.0-S2666558124000216-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellbeing Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666558124000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accessible and high quality shared outdoor open spaces, both built and natural, can be particularly beneficial for health and wellbeing. The design and quality of shared outdoor spaces are often modifiable and the health and wellbeing-promoting potential of such spaces can, therefore, be enhanced. However, optimal modification of shared outdoor spaces requires a greater understanding of perceptions and experiences. Citizen Science projects can be particularly valuable for capturing experiences of wellbeing in different environments and shared outdoor spaces, although suitable validated scales are lacking. This paper aims to develop and conduct psychometric testing on the Perceived Wellbeing in Shared Outdoor Spaces (PWOSS) Scale. The study involves three key phases of scale development and evaluation: (i) identifying suitable domains and generating initial items for the PWOSS Scale; (ii) pre-testing the PWOSS Scale and conducting item reduction analysis and factor extraction to refine the scale items using a sample of potential users from Edinburgh, Scotland (n = 137); and (iii) evaluating the PWOSS Scale by testing for dimensionality, reliability and validity. The final PWOSS Scale consisted of nine-items. The factor analysis indicated a two-factor solution (positive and negative wellbeing. The results of the three phases suggest the PWOSS Scale is a valid and reliable scale that can aid our understanding of the link between wellbeing and shared outdoor spaces and environments. The PWOSS Scale offers significant value to Citizen Science projects and to urban planning and public health practitioners interested in modifying and adapting shared outdoor spaces to increase wellbeing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
户外共享空间幸福感量表(PWOSS)的开发与测试
无障碍和高质量的共享室外开放空间(包括建筑空间和自然空间)对健康和幸福特别有益。共享室外空间的设计和质量通常是可以改变的,因此可以提高这些空间促进健康和福祉的潜力。然而,要对共享户外空间进行最佳改造,就必须对人们的看法和体验有更深入的了解。公民科学项目对于捕捉不同环境和共享户外空间中的幸福体验特别有价值,尽管目前还缺乏合适的验证量表。本文旨在开发共享户外空间幸福感量表(PWOSS)并对其进行心理测试。研究包括量表开发和评估的三个关键阶段:(i) 为 PWOSS 量表确定合适的领域并生成初始项目;(ii) 使用苏格兰爱丁堡的潜在用户样本(n = 137)对 PWOSS 量表进行预测试,并进行项目还原分析和因子提取,以完善量表项目;(iii) 通过测试维度、信度和效度对 PWOSS 量表进行评估。最终的 PWOSS 量表由九个项目组成。因素分析表明有两个因素(积极和消极幸福感)。三个阶段的结果表明,PWOSS 量表是一个有效、可靠的量表,有助于我们了解幸福感与共享户外空间和环境之间的联系。PWOSS 量表对公民科学项目以及对改造和调整共享户外空间以提高幸福感感兴趣的城市规划和公共卫生从业人员具有重要价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Wellbeing Space and Society
Wellbeing Space and Society Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
124 days
期刊最新文献
Neighborhood ‘double disadvantage’ and child development in inner city and growth areas “If I was in charge”: A qualitative investigation of water security, gender-based violence and wellbeing in Kenya Process and practice in New Zealand Enviroschool implementation The loss of rural vital places: A case study using the social determinants of health framework The contributions of community seed saving to health and wellbeing: A qualitative study in Thunder Bay, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1