Statistical-based models for the production of landslide susceptibility maps and general risk analyses: a case study in Maçka, Turkey

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Acta Geophysica Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1007/s11600-024-01380-w
Fatih Kadi
{"title":"Statistical-based models for the production of landslide susceptibility maps and general risk analyses: a case study in Maçka, Turkey","authors":"Fatih Kadi","doi":"10.1007/s11600-024-01380-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The district of Maçka in Trabzon, in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey, frequently experiences landslides, resulting in the highest number of disaster victims. In this study, Landslide Susceptibility Maps (LSMs) were generated via the Statistical-based Frequency Ratio (FR) and Modified Information Value (MIV) models using 10 factors. Out of the 150 landslides in the region, 105 (70%) were utilized in creating the maps, and the remaining 45 (30%) were reserved for validation. The models demonstrated success rates of 87.5% and 84.9%, along with prediction rates of 84.8% and 83.1%, respectively, as determined by the receiver operating characteristics curve and area under the curve values. While both models achieved acceptable levels of accuracy, MIV outperformed FR. Additionally, the risk status of 5413 buildings and forested areas was examined. The results showed that 78.64% (FR) and 80.79% (MIV) of the buildings were situated in high landslide risk areas. Regarding forest areas, 39.30% (FR) and 41.35% (MIV) were observed in high-risk landslide areas. In the next step, neighborhood landslide risk statuses were examined, revealing risks ranging from 90 to 100% in some areas. The final step concentrated on risk analyses for construction plans in a chosen pilot neighborhood using two criteria. 88.75% of all parcels were observed in high-risk areas, with hazelnut groves at 79.67% in high-risk zones. Conversely, 71.89% of fruit trees were in low-risk areas. The results align with the literature, indicating that LSMs can serve as a versatile base map.</p>","PeriodicalId":6988,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geophysica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-024-01380-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The district of Maçka in Trabzon, in the Eastern Black Sea Region of Turkey, frequently experiences landslides, resulting in the highest number of disaster victims. In this study, Landslide Susceptibility Maps (LSMs) were generated via the Statistical-based Frequency Ratio (FR) and Modified Information Value (MIV) models using 10 factors. Out of the 150 landslides in the region, 105 (70%) were utilized in creating the maps, and the remaining 45 (30%) were reserved for validation. The models demonstrated success rates of 87.5% and 84.9%, along with prediction rates of 84.8% and 83.1%, respectively, as determined by the receiver operating characteristics curve and area under the curve values. While both models achieved acceptable levels of accuracy, MIV outperformed FR. Additionally, the risk status of 5413 buildings and forested areas was examined. The results showed that 78.64% (FR) and 80.79% (MIV) of the buildings were situated in high landslide risk areas. Regarding forest areas, 39.30% (FR) and 41.35% (MIV) were observed in high-risk landslide areas. In the next step, neighborhood landslide risk statuses were examined, revealing risks ranging from 90 to 100% in some areas. The final step concentrated on risk analyses for construction plans in a chosen pilot neighborhood using two criteria. 88.75% of all parcels were observed in high-risk areas, with hazelnut groves at 79.67% in high-risk zones. Conversely, 71.89% of fruit trees were in low-risk areas. The results align with the literature, indicating that LSMs can serve as a versatile base map.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于统计的滑坡易发性地图绘制和一般风险分析模型:土耳其马奇卡的案例研究
土耳其东部黑海地区特拉布宗的马奇卡区经常发生山体滑坡,是受灾人数最多的地区。在这项研究中,通过基于统计的频率比 (FR) 和修正信息值 (MIV) 模型,使用 10 个因子生成了滑坡易感性地图 (LSM)。在该地区的 150 个滑坡体中,有 105 个(70%)用于绘制地图,其余 45 个(30%)用于验证。根据接收器工作特性曲线和曲线下面积值,模型的成功率分别为 87.5%和 84.9%,预测率分别为 84.8%和 83.1%。虽然两种模型都达到了可接受的准确度水平,但 MIV 的表现优于 FR。此外,还对 5413 栋建筑物和林区的风险状况进行了研究。结果显示,78.64%(FR)和 80.79%(MIV)的建筑物位于高滑坡风险区域。林区方面,39.30%(前线)和 41.35%(后线)的建筑物位于滑坡高风险区。下一步,对邻近地区的滑坡风险状况进行了检查,发现某些地区的风险从 90%到 100%不等。最后一步主要是根据两个标准对所选试点街区的施工计划进行风险分析。88.75%的地块位于高风险区域,其中 79.67%的榛子园位于高风险区域。相反,71.89% 的果树位于低风险区域。结果与文献一致,表明 LSM 可以作为通用的基础地图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geophysica
Acta Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
251
期刊介绍: Acta Geophysica is open to all kinds of manuscripts including research and review articles, short communications, comments to published papers, letters to the Editor as well as book reviews. Some of the issues are fully devoted to particular topics; we do encourage proposals for such topical issues. We accept submissions from scientists world-wide, offering high scientific and editorial standard and comprehensive treatment of the discussed topics.
期刊最新文献
SCP parameters estimation for catalogs with uncertain seismic magnitude values Unveiling the impact of temperature inversions on air quality: a comprehensive analysis of polluted and severe polluted days in Istanbul Petro-elastic model of the multiple pore-crack structure of carbonate rocks based on digital cores Interseismic strain accumulation across the Tuolaishan–Lenglongling segment of the Qilian–Haiyuan fault zone prior to the 2022 Mw 6.7 Menyuan earthquake from Sentinel-1 InSAR time series Level of thermal maturity estimation in unconventional reservoirs using interval inversion and simulating annealing method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1